Skip to content

Conversation

gcatanese
Copy link
Contributor

Add new team to CODEOWNERS

@gcatanese gcatanese requested a review from a team as a code owner October 6, 2025 19:59
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @gcatanese, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the code ownership configuration by including the @Adyen/api-library-maintainers team in the .github/CODEOWNERS file. This change ensures that the specified team is automatically requested for review on pull requests affecting their designated code areas, streamlining the review process and clarifying responsibility for the API library.

Highlights

  • CODEOWNERS Update: The @Adyen/api-library-maintainers team has been added to the .github/CODEOWNERS file, granting them ownership over relevant code.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds the @Adyen/api-library-maintainers team to the CODEOWNERS file. My review focuses on ensuring that code ownership is defined granularly. I've suggested refining the ownership rules to be more specific to the parts of the codebase the new team is responsible for, rather than assigning global ownership. This is a common best practice to ensure team members are only notified for relevant code reviews, improving the efficiency of the development process.

@@ -1 +1 @@
* @Adyen/developer-relations
* @Adyen/developer-relations @Adyen/api-library-maintainers

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Adding @Adyen/api-library-maintainers as a global owner will result in this team being requested for review on every pull request in the repository. The team's name suggests they have a specific focus on an API library. If that's the case, assigning global ownership might lead to notification fatigue from irrelevant review requests (e.g., for documentation or configuration changes).

Consider defining more granular ownership rules to target only the relevant parts of the codebase. This ensures that teams are only notified for changes within their scope of responsibility.

For example:

* @Adyen/developer-relations
/path/to/api/library/ @Adyen/api-library-maintainers

Please consider if this more specific approach would be a better fit for your repository's structure.

@gcatanese gcatanese merged commit 849460c into main Oct 6, 2025
7 checks passed
@gcatanese gcatanese deleted the add-codeowners branch October 6, 2025 20:05
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Oct 6, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant