-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
Add @Adyen/api-library-maintainers to CODEOWNERS #827
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @gcatanese, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request updates the code ownership configuration by including the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds the @Adyen/api-library-maintainers
team to the CODEOWNERS
file. My review focuses on ensuring that code ownership is defined granularly. I've suggested refining the ownership rules to be more specific to the parts of the codebase the new team is responsible for, rather than assigning global ownership. This is a common best practice to ensure team members are only notified for relevant code reviews, improving the efficiency of the development process.
@@ -1 +1 @@ | |||
* @Adyen/developer-relations | |||
* @Adyen/developer-relations @Adyen/api-library-maintainers |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding @Adyen/api-library-maintainers
as a global owner will result in this team being requested for review on every pull request in the repository. The team's name suggests they have a specific focus on an API library. If that's the case, assigning global ownership might lead to notification fatigue from irrelevant review requests (e.g., for documentation or configuration changes).
Consider defining more granular ownership rules to target only the relevant parts of the codebase. This ensures that teams are only notified for changes within their scope of responsibility.
For example:
* @Adyen/developer-relations
/path/to/api/library/ @Adyen/api-library-maintainers
Please consider if this more specific approach would be a better fit for your repository's structure.
|
Add new team to CODEOWNERS