Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Wrong number of cores using in skimming #365

Closed
pedrocamargo opened this issue Nov 25, 2022 · 0 comments
Closed

Wrong number of cores using in skimming #365

pedrocamargo opened this issue Nov 25, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@Jake-Moss

Comments

@pedrocamargo
Copy link
Contributor

Always using all cores in network skimming.

image
Jake-Moss added a commit to Jake-Moss/aequilibrae that referenced this issue Nov 25, 2022
@Jake-Moss
Fix: AequilibraE#365 Use specified number of cores
00ebd5c
pedrocamargo added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 29, 2022
@pedrocamargo @djfrancesco
@chrisobi02 @jamiecook @Jake-Moss
Release candidate (#361)
a24a8e0 
* Upgrades Numpy version (#353)

* Limits pyarrow version

* Makes PyArrow an optional dependency (#356)

Co-authored-by: pveigadecamargo <pveigadecamargo@anl.gov>

* Update setup.py (#357)

* Bumps up version

* Updates setup

* Sets version for AequilibraE

* Fixes packaging (#362)


Co-authored-by: pveigadecamargo <pveigadecamargo@anl.gov>
Co-authored-by: djfrancesco <pacullfrancois@gmail.com>

* Fix: #365 Use specified number of cores (#366)

* Fix skim cost calculation on compact graph (#367)

When skimming the network using the compact graph the last link (within
the dataframe) was being ignored.
Co-authored-by: chrisobi02 <chrisgobrien02@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jamie Cook <jamie.cook@veitchlister.com.au>
Co-authored-by: djfrancesco <pacullfrancois@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jake Moss <jake.moss@uqconnect.edu.au>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Jake-Moss Jake-Moss

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@pedrocamargo @Jake-Moss