Restructuring documentation navigation

[al-fisher]

Closes #85

WIP - will notify when ready for review

This is good for a review now! 😸
Pretty happy with the navigation menu now, having consolidated and reshuffled all our good pages and content into a tight logical (I think) structure. And one which sets us up for expanding and writing more content - both as documentation of the core concepts and as Guides and Tutorials. Happy to hear what others think

N.B. @FraserGreenroyd I have not changed the root path of the DevOps URLs - just changing its position in the menu - but happy for you to please confirm all is as expected. 👍

I have also raised an issue here: #93 outlining some possible next steps. Some we may want to agree prioritising of

@FraserGreenroyd @alelom - happy to chat here and coordinate support finalising next steps

[al-fisher]

I have pushed a new commit replacing the white space with hyphens for a couple of the critical menu items as per suggested recommendations. This means I can decouple full and exhaustive close out of #86 from updating the READMEs in core repos and subsequently being able to merge this PR.

[al-fisher]

Hey @alelom @FraserGreenroyd @michaelhoehn all
As above I reformatted some of folders in order get this mergeable as a series of PRs along with the READMEs in the core Repos (and meaning we wont need to do those again when we tackle #86 a some point in future.

So this is now ready for final review and hopefully merge! 😸

Cheers

[FraserGreenroyd]

Thanks @al-fisher , have skimmed the read-me updates and look good, one minor query on the template repo one. Have planned some time tomorrow to go through this PR unless @alelom gets to it first 😄

[al-fisher]

Thanks @FraserGreenroyd - have mopped up your comment on the template repo! cheers

[alelom]

This looks great! Thanks a lot!
Just a minor suggestion and a comment on how we could solve #86 (outside this PR).

[FraserGreenroyd]

I've had a run through the files today though not all, but everything looks ok from what I saw and is in line with the discussions, and I know @alelom has checked the links and stuff (even if his review doesn't state it 😄 ) as I was in contact with him during the day on this work.

Only thing missing @al-fisher is a label, but I think the documentation one will suffice so I'll pop that on for now - feel free to change it if you disagree 😄

[al-fisher]

Perfect thanks both
@alelom, @FraserGreenroyd