Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

migrate from OpenJDK to Zulu #293

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2020
Merged

migrate from OpenJDK to Zulu #293

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2020

Conversation

StrikerRUS
Copy link
Member

@StrikerRUS StrikerRUS commented Aug 13, 2020

I remember we had to move to Zulu in LightGBM project due to changed license agreement and limited support. As we are now using our Docker at CI services (and possibly will produce artifacts from it) I think we should do the same.

To be honest, I'm far away from legal aspects of software development, but I believe we should use only things that are totally free and have no pitfalls.

Echoing myself from the past:
Azul Zulu

  • free to use,
  • updated regularly.

I can say that Zulu implementation looks quite stable as there have been no issues with it for more than one year in the LightGBM repo (guolinke/lightgbm-ci-docker#1).

Some refs:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/microsoft-and-azul-systems-bring-free-java-lts-support-to-azure/
https://habr.com/ru/post/448632/

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 13, 2020

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 96.537% when pulling e4880c9 on java into 7a65fb4 on master.

Copy link
Member

@izeigerman izeigerman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no objections to use Zulu JDK instead!

@izeigerman izeigerman merged commit 4b6b199 into master Sep 4, 2020
@izeigerman izeigerman deleted the java branch September 4, 2020 21:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants