-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
✨ Add fork workflow functionality #135
Conversation
After having though about it a little more, I think it would make the most sense to include the step of actually forking repositories in this action as well, since we have already parsed the file containing the list of external repositories we are working with. I've added another commit to include the few lines needed to fork. |
Yeah, makes sense. Still marked as a draft, is it ready to review? |
Apologies for the slow response, but yes! |
Other than the small change, everything looks good to me. Could you add the Will merge it after that. |
I've added |
Thanks! |
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.16.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Adds the option of a "fork and pull request" workflow.
Can be enabled by specifying which user/bot account contains the forks, using the
FORK
input, defaulted to false.head
is changed to the new branch on the forked repositoryThe advantage of this style is no write access is required to upstream repositories. This also means, however, that adding labels/assignees is not possible, so that has to be disabled if
FORK
is specified.Note: This setup assumes the forks have already been created.