Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CIDC-1552 remove analysis from wes folder #568

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2022
Merged

CIDC-1552 remove analysis from wes folder #568

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2022

Conversation

scvannost
Copy link
Contributor

What

Remove analysis from end of WES analysis folder in autogenerated templates

Why

CIDC-1552

Checklist

Please include and complete the following checklist. You can mark an item as complete with the - [x] prefix:

  • Tests - Added unit tests for new code, regression tests for bugs and updated the integration tests if required
  • Formatting & Linting - black and flake8 have been used to ensure styling guidelines are met
  • Type Annotations - All new code has been type annotated in the function signatures using type hints
  • Docstrings - Docstrings have been provided for functions
  • Documentation - Documentation in docs/ has be regenerated and README and CHANGELOG have been updated to explain major changes & new features
  • Package version - Manually bumped the Schemas package version in cidc_schemas/__init__.py

@codeclimate
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Nov 28, 2022

Code Climate has analyzed commit 1de4ddd and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 94.5% (0.0% change).

View more on Code Climate.

@scvannost scvannost merged commit 0218d02 into master Nov 28, 2022
@scvannost scvannost deleted the wes-config branch November 28, 2022 18:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants