Skip to content

Sync with atomic jolt #16

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 23, 2017
Merged

Sync with atomic jolt #16

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 23, 2017

Conversation

coleshaw
Copy link

Code-review checklist

  • Documentation
    • Interfaces describe how other programmers would use them.
    • Code that is not obvious has documentation describing why
      that code is the way it is.

Ben Smith and others added 3 commits February 22, 2017 14:40
@jbasdf
Answers (#144)
59a2123 
* A start on answering

* Attempting to serialize data to a better thing. Not 100 % yet

* I think saving answers works now

* kills a logger
@dspencer001 @jbasdf
Use single feedback for now. (#142)
7638ab2
Better updates (#145)
da67f27 
* sets shuffle flag

* Updates ordering questions

* confirms deletion
@coleshaw coleshaw requested a review from resource11 February 23, 2017 13:59
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.368% when pulling da67f27 on atomicjolt:master into c40abac on CLIxIndia-Dev:master.

@resource11 resource11 merged commit 5bd6dc4 into CLIxIndia-Dev:master Feb 23, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@resource11 resource11 resource11 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@coleshaw @coveralls @resource11 @dspencer001