We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Our transformations do not cope well with 'False' atm.
For example, reify_rewrite(False) returns [] which is clearly wrong. This is the cause of the following bug: Model([False]).solve() returns True!!
reify_rewrite(False)
[]
Model([False]).solve()
True
Same holds for the linearize transformation. It crashes when trying to transform False.
linearize
False
But I guess some solvers do not support adding False to the solver in their API... Which is understandable but annoying for us.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
IgnaceBleukx
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Our transformations do not cope well with 'False' atm.
For example,
reify_rewrite(False)
returns[]
which is clearly wrong.This is the cause of the following bug:
Model([False]).solve()
returnsTrue
!!Same holds for the
linearize
transformation. It crashes when trying to transformFalse
.But I guess some solvers do not support adding
False
to the solver in their API... Which is understandable but annoying for us.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: