Skip to content
Merged
230 changes: 230 additions & 0 deletions backend/src/build-system/__tests__/db-requirement-document.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
### Database Requirements Document

#### 1. Overview

- **Project Scope**: Design and implement a database to support a Spotify-like music web application, facilitating personalized music streaming, content management, and user interaction.
- **Database Purpose**: Store and manage user profiles, music content, playlists, playback states, and preferences to support dynamic, personalized user experiences.
- **General Requirements**:
- Ensure high availability and scalability to handle concurrent user activity.
- Support real-time data updates for personalized recommendations and playback.
- Ensure data integrity and enforce business rules.

---

#### 2. Entity Definitions

##### User

- **Description**: Represents registered users of the application.
- **Business Rules**:
- Each user must have a unique email.
- Users can manage their preferences and account details.
- **Key Attributes**:
- `user_id` (Primary Key)
- `username` (Unique, required)
- `email` (Unique, required)
- `password_hash` (Required)
- `subscription_type` (e.g., Free, Premium)
- `preferences` (e.g., theme, audio quality)
- `created_at`, `updated_at`
Comment on lines +23 to +29
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add essential attributes for streaming platform functionality

The User and Song entities are missing critical attributes needed for a music streaming platform:

User entity should include:

  • last_login: For security and activity tracking
  • account_status: To manage active/suspended accounts
  • role: For permission management (e.g., regular user, admin, artist)

Song entity should include:

  • file_location: To store the actual audio file path/URL
  • bitrate: For audio quality management
  • stream_count: For analytics
  • is_explicit: For content filtering

Would you like me to provide a detailed schema for these additional attributes?

Also applies to: 41-48

- **Relationships**:
- One-to-many with `Playlist`.
- Many-to-many with `Song` for liked songs.

##### Song

- **Description**: Represents individual songs available on the platform.
- **Business Rules**:
- Each song must have an associated album and artist.
- Songs may belong to multiple playlists.
- **Key Attributes**:
- `song_id` (Primary Key)
- `title` (Required)
- `artist_id` (Foreign Key)
- `album_id` (Foreign Key)
- `duration` (In seconds)
- `genre` (Category)
- `release_date`
- **Relationships**:
- Many-to-one with `Album` and `Artist`.
- Many-to-many with `Playlist`.

##### Artist

- **Description**: Represents artists whose songs are on the platform.
- **Key Attributes**:
- `artist_id` (Primary Key)
- `name` (Required)
- `bio`
- `profile_image`
- `created_at`, `updated_at`
- **Relationships**:
- One-to-many with `Song` and `Album`.

##### Album

- **Description**: Represents music albums.
- **Key Attributes**:
- `album_id` (Primary Key)
- `title` (Required)
- `artist_id` (Foreign Key)
- `release_date`
- `cover_image`
- **Relationships**:
- One-to-many with `Song`.

##### Playlist

- **Description**: Represents user-created or curated playlists.
- **Business Rules**:
- A playlist must belong to a user or be globally curated.
- **Key Attributes**:
- `playlist_id` (Primary Key)
- `name` (Required)
- `user_id` (Foreign Key, nullable for curated playlists)
- `description`
- `is_curated` (Boolean)
- `created_at`, `updated_at`
- **Relationships**:
- Many-to-many with `Song`.

##### PlaybackState

- **Description**: Tracks the playback state for a user.
- **Key Attributes**:
- `playback_id` (Primary Key)
- `user_id` (Foreign Key)
- `current_song_id` (Foreign Key)
- `queue` (Array of `song_id`s)
- `playback_position` (Seconds)
- `volume`
- `created_at`, `updated_at`

##### Recommendation

- **Description**: Stores dynamic recommendations for users.
- **Key Attributes**:
- `recommendation_id` (Primary Key)
- `user_id` (Foreign Key)
- `content` (JSON: list of recommended songs, albums, playlists)
- `generated_at`

---

#### 3. Data Requirements

##### User

- Fields:
- `user_id`: UUID
- `username`: String (max 50)
- `email`: String (unique, max 100)
- `password_hash`: String
- `subscription_type`: Enum (Free, Premium)
- `preferences`: JSON
- `created_at`, `updated_at`: Timestamps
- Constraints:
- `email` and `username` must be unique.
- Enforce non-null constraints on required fields.
- Indexing:
Comment on lines +118 to +129
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add specific validation rules and constraints

The data requirements need more specific validation rules:

  1. User entity:

    • Add email format validation regex
    • Define password complexity requirements (min length, required characters)
    • Specify username allowed characters
  2. PlaybackState:

    • Define volume range (e.g., 0.0 to 1.0)
    • Specify playback_position constraints

Would you like me to provide detailed validation rules for these fields?

Also applies to: 167-168

- Index on `email` and `user_id`.

##### Song

- Fields:
- `song_id`: UUID
- `title`: String (max 100)
- `artist_id`, `album_id`: Foreign Keys
- `duration`: Integer
- `genre`: String
- `release_date`: Date
- Constraints:
- Non-null constraints on `title`, `artist_id`, and `album_id`.
- Indexing:
- Index on `title` and `genre`.

##### Playlist

- Fields:
- `playlist_id`: UUID
- `name`: String (max 50)
- `user_id`: Foreign Key
- `description`: String
- `is_curated`: Boolean
- `created_at`, `updated_at`: Timestamps
- Constraints:
- Enforce foreign key constraints for `user_id`.
- Indexing:
- Index on `user_id`.

##### PlaybackState

- Fields:
- `playback_id`: UUID
- `user_id`: Foreign Key
- `current_song_id`: Foreign Key
- `queue`: JSON
- `playback_position`: Integer
- `volume`: Float
- `created_at`, `updated_at`: Timestamps
- Constraints:
- Ensure valid `user_id` and `current_song_id`.

---

#### 4. Relationships

- `User` to `Playlist`: One-to-many.
- `Playlist` to `Song`: Many-to-many (junction table: `playlist_song`).
- `Song` to `Album`: Many-to-one.
- `Song` to `Artist`: Many-to-one.
- `User` to `PlaybackState`: One-to-one.
- Referential Integrity:
- Cascade delete for dependent entities (e.g., playlists when a user is deleted).

---

#### 5. Data Access Patterns

- Common Queries:
- Fetch user playlists, liked songs, and playback state.
- Search for songs, albums, or artists.
- Fetch recommended content dynamically.
- Indexing:
- Full-text search for song titles and artist names.
- Index on foreign keys for join performance.

---

#### 6. Security Requirements

- Access Control:
- Restrict user data to authenticated sessions.
- Data Privacy:
- Hash sensitive data (e.g., passwords).
- Audit:
- Log user activity and data changes.

Comment on lines +201 to +207
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add compliance and disaster recovery requirements

The security and backup sections need additional requirements:

  1. Data Privacy & Compliance:

    • Add GDPR compliance requirements
    • Define data retention policies
    • Specify user data export capabilities
  2. Disaster Recovery:

    • Define Recovery Time Objective (RTO)
    • Specify Recovery Point Objective (RPO)
    • Add geo-redundancy requirements

Would you like me to provide detailed compliance and DR requirements?

Also applies to: 225-230

---

#### 7. Performance Requirements

- Expected Volume:
- Millions of songs and playlists.
- Thousands of concurrent users.
- Growth:
- Plan for 10x growth in user and song data over 5 years.
- Optimizations:
- Cache frequently accessed data (e.g., recommendations).
- Use partitioning for large tables.

---

#### 8. Additional Considerations

- Backups:
- Automated daily backups.
- Archiving:
- Move inactive playlists to archival storage after 1 year.
- Integration:
- Support for third-party authentication and external APIs.
49 changes: 49 additions & 0 deletions backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-database-schemas.spec.ts
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
import { BuilderContext } from 'src/build-system/context';
import { DBSchemaHandler } from '../node/database-schemas/schemas';
import { readFileSync } from 'fs';
import markdownToTxt from 'markdown-to-txt';

jest.mock('fs', () => ({
readFileSync: jest.fn(() => 'mock content'),
}));

const RUN_INTEGRATION_TESTS = process.env.RUN_INTEGRATION_TESTS === 'true';

describe('DBSchemaHandler', () => {
describe('Integration Tests', () => {
(RUN_INTEGRATION_TESTS ? describe : describe.skip)(
'Schema Generation Tests',
() => {
it('should generate schema for blog system', async () => {
const handler = new DBSchemaHandler();
const context = new BuilderContext(
{
id: 'test',
name: 'test db schema',
version: '1.0.0',
description: 'test db schema',
steps: [],
},
'test-id-schema-1',
);

const mdFileContent = readFileSync(
'./db-requirement.document.md',
'utf-8',
);
const plainText = markdownToTxt(mdFileContent);
const result = await handler.run(context, plainText);
console.log(result);
}, 30000);
Comment on lines +17 to +37
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add proper assertions and error handling

The integration test lacks assertions and error handling. Consider adding:

  1. Proper assertions to validate the generated schema
  2. Error handling for file operations
  3. Test cleanup
 it('should generate schema for blog system', async () => {
+  try {
     const handler = new DBSchemaHandler();
     const context = new BuilderContext(
       {
         id: 'test',
         name: 'test db schema',
         version: '1.0.0',
         description: 'test db schema',
         steps: [],
       },
       'test-id-schema-1',
     );

     const mdFileContent = readFileSync(
       './db-requirement.document.md',
       'utf-8',
     );
     const plainText = markdownToTxt(mdFileContent);
     const result = await handler.run(context, plainText);
-    console.log(result);
+    expect(result).toBeDefined();
+    expect(result.schema).toHaveProperty('tables');
+    expect(result.schema.tables).toBeInstanceOf(Array);
+  } catch (error) {
+    throw error;
+  }
 }, 30000);

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

},
);
});

describe('Unit Tests', () => {
it('should initialize correctly', () => {
const handler = new DBSchemaHandler();
expect(handler).toBeDefined();
expect(handler.id).toBe('OP:DATABASE:SCHEMAS');
});
});
});
Comment on lines +42 to +49
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance unit test coverage

The current unit tests only cover basic initialization. Consider adding:

  1. Error cases (invalid inputs)
  2. Edge cases
  3. Method-specific tests
describe('Unit Tests', () => {
  let handler: DBSchemaHandler;

  beforeEach(() => {
    handler = new DBSchemaHandler();
  });

  it('should initialize correctly', () => {
    expect(handler).toBeDefined();
    expect(handler.id).toBe('OP:DATABASE:SCHEMAS');
  });

  it('should throw error for invalid input', async () => {
    const context = new BuilderContext(/* ... */);
    await expect(handler.run(context, '')).rejects.toThrow();
  });

  it('should handle malformed markdown', async () => {
    const context = new BuilderContext(/* ... */);
    await expect(handler.run(context, '### Invalid markdown')).rejects.toThrow();
  });
});

19 changes: 1 addition & 18 deletions backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.spec.ts
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ import { BuildSequenceExecutor } from '../executor';
import { BuildHandlerManager } from '../hanlder-manager';
import { ProjectInitHandler } from '../node/project-init';
import { BuildSequence } from '../types';

describe('Project Init Handler Test', () => {
let context: BuilderContext;
let executor: BuildSequenceExecutor;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -35,7 +34,7 @@ describe('Project Init Handler Test', () => {
handlerManager = BuildHandlerManager.getInstance();
handlerManager.clear();

context = new BuilderContext(testSequence);
context = new BuilderContext(testSequence, 'id');
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Test coverage for BuilderContext's 'id' parameter is insufficient

The verification reveals that while the 'id' parameter is used to create a unique logger instance (new Logger(builder-context-${id})), the test file doesn't verify this functionality. Additionally, several important test scenarios are missing:

  • No assertions to verify the logger instantiation with the correct ID
  • No tests for different ID values and their impact on logging
  • No verification of logger behavior in different execution contexts

Suggested test additions:

  • Test logger instantiation with different IDs
  • Verify logger behavior during node execution
  • Test error scenarios with various context IDs
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the impact of the new BuilderContext constructor parameter.

The addition of 'id' parameter to BuilderContext constructor suggests a change in the context initialization, but the tests don't verify how this parameter affects the context behavior.

Let's check the BuilderContext implementation to understand the parameter's purpose:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find BuilderContext implementation and its usage of 'id' parameter
ast-grep --pattern 'class BuilderContext {
  constructor($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 86


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for BuilderContext class and its usage
rg "class BuilderContext" -A 10

# Also search for any imports of BuilderContext to understand its location
rg "import.*BuilderContext"

Length of output: 1733


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the BuilderContext constructor and its usage of 'id'
rg -A 5 "constructor.*BuilderContext" backend/src/build-system/context.ts

# Also check the test file to understand the test coverage
cat backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.spec.ts

Length of output: 2055


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any other test files that might demonstrate BuilderContext id usage
rg -l "new BuilderContext" backend/src/build-system/__tests__/

# And examine the implementation file more thoroughly
cat backend/src/build-system/context.ts

Length of output: 3472

executor = new BuildSequenceExecutor(context);
});

Expand All @@ -47,22 +46,6 @@ describe('Project Init Handler Test', () => {
});
});

describe('State Management', () => {
test('should update execution state correctly', async () => {
let state = context.getState();
expect(state.completed.size).toBe(0);
expect(state.pending.size).toBe(0);

await executor.executeSequence(testSequence);

state = context.getState();
expect(state.completed.size).toBe(1);
expect(state.completed.has('op:PROJECT::STATE:SETUP')).toBe(true);
expect(state.pending.size).toBe(0);
expect(state.failed.size).toBe(0);
});
});

describe('Direct Handler Execution', () => {
test('should be able to run handler directly', async () => {
const handler = new ProjectInitHandler();
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
import { BuildHandler, BuildResult } from 'src/build-system/types';
import { BuilderContext } from 'src/build-system/context';
import { ModelProvider } from 'src/common/model-provider';
import * as fs from 'fs';
import * as path from 'path';
import { prompts } from './prompt';
import { Logger } from '@nestjs/common';

export class DatabaseRequirementHandler implements BuildHandler {
readonly id = 'op:DATABASE_REQ::STATE:GENERATE';
readonly logger = new Logger('DatabaseRequirementHandler');
async run(context: BuilderContext, args: unknown): Promise<BuildResult> {
this.logger.log('Generating Database Requirements Document...');
const projectName =
context.getData('projectName') || 'Default Project Name';

const prompt = prompts.generateDatabaseRequirementPrompt(
projectName,
args as string,
);
Comment on lines +19 to +20
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add type validation for args parameter

The type assertion args as string is unsafe. Consider adding proper type validation before the assertion.

-      args as string,
+      typeof args === 'string' ? args : JSON.stringify(args),
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
args as string,
);
typeof args === 'string' ? args : JSON.stringify(args),
);

const model = ModelProvider.getInstance();
const dbRequirementsContent = await model.chatSync(
{
content: prompt,
},
'gpt-4o-mini',
);
Comment on lines +22 to +27
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance error handling and configuration management

Several improvements needed:

  1. Add try-catch block for model.chatSync
  2. Move the model identifier to configuration
  3. Validate the model response structure
+    const MODEL_ID = process.env.DB_REQ_MODEL_ID || 'gpt-4o-mini';
+    try {
       const dbRequirementsContent = await model.chatSync(
         {
           content: prompt,
         },
-        'gpt-4o-mini',
+        MODEL_ID,
       );
+      if (!dbRequirementsContent || typeof dbRequirementsContent !== 'string') {
+        throw new Error('Invalid model response format');
+      }
+    } catch (error) {
+      this.logger.error(`Failed to generate database requirements: ${error.message}`);
+      return {
+        success: false,
+        error: 'Failed to generate database requirements',
+      };
+    }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

return {
success: true,
data: dbRequirementsContent,
};
}
}
Loading
Loading