chore(backend): optimization handler output content #86
Conversation
… and remove code block fences
|
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-generate-doc.spec.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier". (The package "eslint-plugin-prettier" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "/backend".) It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following: The plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier" was referenced from the config file in "backend/.eslintrc.js". If you still can't figure out the problem, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces significant changes across multiple files in the backend and LLM server, focusing on standardizing model interaction, response handling, and utility functions. The modifications primarily involve updating how chat models are invoked, processing model responses, and refactoring utility functions like Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Handler
participant ModelProvider
participant AIModel
Client->>Handler: Initiate request
Handler->>ModelProvider: Call chatSync with structured message
ModelProvider->>AIModel: Send message with role and content
AIModel-->>ModelProvider: Generate response
ModelProvider-->>Handler: Return raw response
Handler->>Handler: Apply formatResponse
Handler-->>Client: Return processed result
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Labels
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-arch/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
45-68: Improve retry mechanism and error handling.The current retry mechanism could be enhanced with exponential backoff and more descriptive error messages.
+ private async retryWithBackoff<T>( + operation: () => Promise<T>, + maxRetries: number = 2, + initialDelay: number = 1000 + ): Promise<T> { + let retryCount = 0; + while (true) { + try { + return await operation(); + } catch (error) { + if (retryCount >= maxRetries) throw error; + const delay = initialDelay * Math.pow(2, retryCount); + this.logger.warn(`Retry ${retryCount + 1}/${maxRetries} after ${delay}ms`); + await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, delay)); + retryCount++; + } + } + }
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
llm-server/src/main.ts (2)
30-56: Consider alternatives to commented codeWhile the commented-out embedding handler is well-structured, keeping large blocks of commented code in the codebase can make it harder to maintain. Consider:
- Moving this code to documentation if it serves as a reference
- Creating a backup branch if this is temporary
- Removing it entirely if this is a permanent change
Line range hint
1-124: Consider documenting the embedding feature removalThe systematic removal of embedding functionality represents a significant architectural change. Consider:
- Adding a comment explaining why embedding functionality was removed
- Updating relevant documentation to reflect this change
- Creating an ADR (Architecture Decision Record) if this is a permanent architectural decision
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run tests and upload coverage
[error] 5-5: Cannot find module 'dotenv' or its corresponding type declarations
backend/src/build-system/handlers/database/requirements-document/index.ts (1)
23-26: Consider using configuration for model nameThe model name is hardcoded. Consider moving it to a configuration file or using the
defaultModelfromModelProviderConfig.backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/datamap/index.ts (1)
23-23: Address TODO comment about platform parameterThe TODO comment indicates that the platform parameter should be changed dynamically. Consider implementing this functionality or creating a tracking issue.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track this enhancement?
backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/sitemap-document/uxsmd.ts (1)
45-48: Verify model name consistency.The model name 'gpt-4o-mini' appears again. Consider extracting model names to a central configuration.
Consider creating a central configuration for model names:
// src/common/constants/models.ts export const MODELS = { DEFAULT_CHAT_MODEL: 'gpt-4o-mini', // Add other models here } as const;backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/code-generate/index.ts (1)
67-68: Consider making the model name configurable.The model name 'gpt-4o-mini' is hardcoded. Consider moving it to a configuration file or environment variable for better maintainability and flexibility.
- model: 'gpt-4o-mini', + model: context.config.defaultModel || 'gpt-4o-mini',backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-arch/index.ts (2)
64-65: Add validation before JSON extraction.Consider validating the tag content before attempting JSON extraction to prevent potential errors.
- const tagContent = parseGenerateTag(fileArchContent); - jsonData = extractJsonFromText(tagContent); + const tagContent = parseGenerateTag(fileArchContent); + if (!tagContent) { + throw new Error('Failed to extract content from GENERATE tags'); + } + jsonData = extractJsonFromText(tagContent);
93-93: Consider caching formatted response.The response is formatted twice: once during JSON extraction and again in the return statement. Consider caching the formatted response.
- data: formatResponse(fileArchContent), + data: tagContent, // Use the already formatted content from earlierbackend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/requirements-document/index.ts (1)
58-58: Consider extracting the model identifier to configuration.The hardcoded model identifier 'gpt-4o-mini' could be moved to a configuration file or environment variable for better maintainability and flexibility across environments.
+// Add to a config file or .env +const DEFAULT_MODEL = process.env.CHAT_MODEL || 'gpt-4o-mini'; backendOverview = await context.model.chatSync({ - model: 'gpt-4o-mini', + model: DEFAULT_MODEL, messages: [{ content: overviewPrompt, role: 'system' }], });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (24)
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.model-provider.spec.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/code-generate/index.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/file-review/file-review.ts(4 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/requirements-document/index.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/database/requirements-document/index.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/database/schemas/schemas.ts(4 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-arch/index.ts(4 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-arch/prompt.ts(3 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-structure/index.ts(4 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/product-manager/product-requirements-document/prd.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/datamap/index.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/sitemap-document/uxsmd.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/sitemap-structure/index.ts(4 hunks)backend/src/build-system/utils/database-utils.ts(0 hunks)backend/src/build-system/utils/strings.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/chat/message.model.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/common/model-provider/index.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/common/model-provider/types.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/config/config-loader.ts(0 hunks)backend/src/embedding/__tests__/loadAllEmbModels.spec.ts(0 hunks)llm-server/src/emb-provider.ts(4 hunks)llm-server/src/embedding/emb-provider.ts(1 hunks)llm-server/src/embedding/openai-embedding-provider.ts(4 hunks)llm-server/src/main.ts(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- backend/src/embedding/tests/loadAllEmbModels.spec.ts
- backend/src/build-system/utils/database-utils.ts
- backend/src/config/config-loader.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- llm-server/src/embedding/emb-provider.ts
- llm-server/src/emb-provider.ts
- backend/src/build-system/tests/test.model-provider.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run tests and upload coverage
llm-server/src/main.ts
[error] 5-5: Cannot find module 'dotenv' or its corresponding type declarations
🔇 Additional comments (24)
llm-server/src/main.ts (1)
24-28: LGTM! Route changes are consistentThe removal of the
/embeddingroute aligns with the overall changes to remove embedding functionality.backend/src/chat/message.model.ts (1)
5-26: Well-documented enum with clear role definitionsThe MessageRole enum is now well-documented with clear descriptions for each role. The role names align with industry standards, and the documentation helps developers understand the purpose of each role.
backend/src/build-system/handlers/product-manager/product-requirements-document/prd.ts (3)
6-6: LGTM!Clean import of the new utility function.
33-33: LGTM!Good use of the utility function to clean up the output content.
39-42: Verify the model name and interface change.The model name 'gpt-4o-mini' seems unusual. Additionally, the interface change to use
messagesarray needs verification across the codebase.✅ Verification successful
Model name and interface are correctly implemented
The model name 'gpt-4o-mini' is consistently used across the codebase in production code. The interface using the
messagesarray is uniform across all implementations, following a consistent pattern with system role messages.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for model name usage and interface consistency echo "Checking model name usage..." rg -l "gpt-4o-mini" echo "Checking chatSync interface usage..." ast-grep --pattern 'modelProvider.chatSync({ $$$messages: $_, $$$})'Length of output: 988
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get all chatSync usages with context echo "Checking all chatSync usages..." rg "chatSync" -A 3 -B 1 echo "Checking for other model names..." rg "model: ['\"](gpt|llama|claude|palm)" -A 1Length of output: 13473
backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/sitemap-document/uxsmd.ts (2)
6-6: LGTM!Clean import of the utility function.
37-37: LGTM!Consistent use of the utility function to clean up the output content.
backend/src/build-system/utils/strings.ts (4)
12-12: LGTM!Clean update to the regex pattern.
26-41: LGTM!Well-documented utility function with proper error handling.
43-56: LGTM!Clean implementation with good documentation.
64-73: LGTM!Good error handling consistent with other functions.
llm-server/src/embedding/openai-embedding-provider.ts (4)
40-42: LGTM!Improved log readability.
56-58: LGTM!Better log formatting.
89-91: LGTM!Clean type assertion and filter logic.
68-69:⚠️ Potential issueAddress the FIXME comment.
The comment indicates a potential issue with the message structure that needs to be resolved.
backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-arch/prompt.ts (1)
Line range hint
5-64: LGTM! Tag standardization looks good.The changes consistently update the tags from GENERATEDCODE to GENERATE, aligning with the standardization efforts across the codebase.
backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/sitemap-structure/index.ts (2)
89-92: Same model name verification neededThe model name 'gpt-4o-mini' needs verification here as well.
34-37: Verify the model name 'gpt-4o-mini'The model name appears to be non-standard. Please verify if this should be 'gpt-4' or another valid model identifier.
✅ Verification successful
'gpt-4o-mini' appears to be a valid custom model name
The model name is consistently used across multiple handlers in the codebase and appears to be part of a custom model family (along with 'gpt-4o'). While it's not a standard OpenAI model name, it seems to be an intentional internal model identifier.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check available model names in the codebase rg -g '*.{ts,js,json}' --type-add 'config:*.{json,js,ts}' -t config 'gpt-4' -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 10201
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for model name mappings or configurations rg -g '*.{ts,js,json}' "gpt-4o-mini" -B 3 -A 3 # Check for any model-related type definitions or interfaces ast-grep --pattern 'type $_Model = { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_Model { $$$ }'Length of output: 12087
backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-structure/index.ts (2)
82-85: Same model name verification neededThe model name 'gpt-4o-mini' needs verification here as well.
120-123: Same model name verification neededThe model name 'gpt-4o-mini' needs verification here as well.
backend/src/build-system/handlers/database/schemas/schemas.ts (3)
73-76: Same model name verification neededThe model name 'gpt-4o-mini' needs verification here as well.
106-110: LGTM! Good use of formatResponseThe addition of formatResponse helps standardize the output formatting across handlers.
129-133: LGTM! Consistent formattingThe use of formatResponse maintains consistency with other response handling.
backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/requirements-document/index.ts (1)
57-60: LGTM! Clean standardization of chat model interaction.The updated structure aligns with standard chat API conventions and properly uses the system role for prompt delivery.
|
|
||
| // const embProvider = new EmbeddingModelProvider('openai'); | ||
| // await embProvider.initialize(); | ||
| const app = new App(llmProvider); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix missing 'dotenv' dependency
The pipeline is failing due to a missing 'dotenv' module. Add it to your dependencies:
+ import 'dotenv/config';Also, run:
npm install dotenv --save| // private embProvider: EmbeddingModelProvider; | ||
|
|
||
| constructor(llmProvider: LLMProvider, embProvider: EmbeddingModelProvider) { | ||
| constructor(llmProvider: LLMProvider) { | ||
| this.app = express(); | ||
| this.app.use(express.json()); | ||
| this.PORT = parseInt(process.env.PORT || '3001', 10); | ||
| this.llmProvider = llmProvider; | ||
| this.embProvider = embProvider; | ||
| // this.embProvider = embProvider; | ||
| this.logger.log(`App initialized with PORT: ${this.PORT}`); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Complete removal of embedding functionality required
The commented-out code is part of a larger embedding system that still exists in the codebase. Please address the following files in the llm-server:
src/emb-provider.tssrc/embedding/openai-embedding-provider.ts
Either remove these files if embedding functionality is no longer needed, or restore the embedding provider if it's still required.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the removal of embedding functionality across the codebase
The removal of embProvider seems intentional, but let's verify there are no remaining dependencies on this functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to EmbeddingModelProvider or embedding-related functionality
rg -l "EmbeddingModelProvider|embProvider|\/embedding" --type ts
# Search for any TODOs or FIXMEs related to embedding
rg -i "TODO.*embed|FIXME.*embed" --type ts
Length of output: 379
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for embedding-related code with fixed regex
rg -l "EmbeddingModelProvider|embProvider|embedding" --type ts
# Search for embedding-related class/interface definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements EmbeddingModelProvider'
ast-grep --pattern 'interface EmbeddingModelProvider'
# Search for import statements related to embedding
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $$ EmbeddingModelProvider $$ } from'
Length of output: 808
| export interface MessageInterface { | ||
| content: string; | ||
| role: MessageRole; | ||
| role: 'user' | 'assistant' | 'system'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using MessageRole enum for better type safety
The change from MessageRole enum to string literals reduces type safety. Using the enum would provide better compile-time checks and maintain consistency with the MessageRole enum defined in message.model.ts.
- role: 'user' | 'assistant' | 'system';
+ role: MessageRole;Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| 'gpt-4o-mini', | ||
| ); | ||
| const dbRequirementsContent = await model.chatSync({ | ||
| model: 'gpt-4o-mini', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix potential typo in model name
The model name 'gpt-4o-mini' appears to have a typo. Should it be 'gpt-4'?
| 'gpt-4o-mini', | ||
| ); | ||
| const uxDatamapContent = await context.model.chatSync({ | ||
| model: 'gpt-4o-mini', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix potential typo in model name
The model name 'gpt-4o-mini' appears to have a typo. Should it be 'gpt-4'?
| export function formatResponse(response: string): string { | ||
| return removeCodeBlockFences( | ||
| parseGenerateTag(removeCodeBlockFences(response)), | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize formatResponse implementation.
The function calls removeCodeBlockFences twice, which is unnecessary.
Consider this optimization:
export function formatResponse(response: string): string {
- return removeCodeBlockFences(
- parseGenerateTag(removeCodeBlockFences(response)),
- );
+ const cleanResponse = removeCodeBlockFences(response);
+ return parseGenerateTag(cleanResponse);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export function formatResponse(response: string): string { | |
| return removeCodeBlockFences( | |
| parseGenerateTag(removeCodeBlockFences(response)), | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| export function formatResponse(response: string): string { | |
| const cleanResponse = removeCodeBlockFences(response); | |
| return parseGenerateTag(cleanResponse); | |
| } |
| const generatedCode = removeCodeBlockFences( | ||
| parseGenerateTag(modelResponse), | ||
| ); | ||
| const generatedCode = formatResponse(modelResponse); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for formatResponse.
The response formatting lacks error handling. Consider wrapping it in a try-catch block to handle potential parsing errors gracefully.
- const generatedCode = formatResponse(modelResponse);
+ let generatedCode;
+ try {
+ generatedCode = formatResponse(modelResponse);
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error('Failed to format model response:', error);
+ throw new Error('Failed to process model response');
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| const modelResponse = await context.model.chatSync({ | ||
| model: 'gpt-4o-mini', | ||
| messages: [{ content: filePrompt, role: 'system' }], | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consolidate model configuration.
Multiple instances of hardcoded model name. Consider creating a constant or configuration for the model name to maintain consistency and ease updates.
+ private readonly MODEL_NAME = 'gpt-4o-mini';
...
model: 'gpt-4o-mini',
- model: 'gpt-4o-mini',
+ model: this.MODEL_NAME,Also applies to: 76-79
| const parsedResponse = JSON.parse(formatResponse(response)); | ||
| this.logger.log('Parsed file identification response:', parsedResponse); | ||
| return parsedResponse; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for JSON parsing.
The parseFileIdentificationResponse method could fail if the response is not valid JSON. Consider adding proper error handling.
parseFileIdentificationResponse(response: string): string[] {
- const parsedResponse = JSON.parse(formatResponse(response));
- this.logger.log('Parsed file identification response:', parsedResponse);
- return parsedResponse;
+ try {
+ const formattedResponse = formatResponse(response);
+ const parsedResponse = JSON.parse(formattedResponse);
+ this.logger.log('Parsed file identification response:', parsedResponse);
+ return parsedResponse;
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error('Failed to parse file identification response:', error);
+ throw new Error('Invalid response format from model');
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const parsedResponse = JSON.parse(formatResponse(response)); | |
| this.logger.log('Parsed file identification response:', parsedResponse); | |
| return parsedResponse; | |
| } | |
| parseFileIdentificationResponse(response: string): string[] { | |
| try { | |
| const formattedResponse = formatResponse(response); | |
| const parsedResponse = JSON.parse(formattedResponse); | |
| this.logger.log('Parsed file identification response:', parsedResponse); | |
| return parsedResponse; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| this.logger.error('Failed to parse file identification response:', error); | |
| throw new Error('Invalid response format from model'); | |
| } | |
| } |
| */ | ||
| chat( | ||
| input: ChatInput | string, | ||
| input: ChatInput, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Breaking Change: Caller needs to be updated for new chat method signature
The chat method signature has been changed to accept a single ChatInput object, but the caller in ChatProxyService.streamChat() is still using the old style with separate arguments:
backend/src/chat/chat.service.ts:28: Updatethis.models.chat(input.message, input.model, input.chatId)to pass the entire input object:this.models.chat(input)
🔗 Analysis chain
Breaking Change: Verify all callers of chat method
The removal of string input support from the chat method parameter is a breaking change. This change enforces better typing but requires verification of all calling code.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all direct calls to the chat method to verify they've been updated
ast-grep --pattern 'chat($INPUT)' -l typescript
Length of output: 49
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for provider.chat() calls
ast-grep --pattern '$PROVIDER.chat($$$)'
# Search for this.chat() calls
ast-grep --pattern 'this.chat($$$)'
# Backup search with ripgrep to catch any other patterns
rg '\.chat\(' -t ts
Length of output: 313
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the chat service implementation
cat backend/src/chat/chat.service.ts
# Double-check for any other potential callers
rg -g '!*.test.ts' -g '!*.spec.ts' 'chat\(' -t ts -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 5783
Sma1lboy
force-pushed
the
chore-optimization-handler-output-content
branch
from
60c6995 to
47d7e43
Compare
Sma1lboy
force-pushed
the
chore-optimization-handler-output-content
branch
from
622834d to
d5bf1b9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.fullstack-gen.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
249-255: Address connection refused error in tests.The pipeline is failing due to a connection refused error when trying to connect to localhost:3001. This could indicate:
- Missing service dependency
- Incorrect port configuration
- Service not starting before the test
Please ensure:
- All required services are properly mocked or running during tests
- The correct port is configured
- Service dependencies are started before the test execution
backend/src/embedding/openai-embbeding-provider.ts (1)
Line range hint
2-3: Resolve Missing Dependencies 'fastembed' and 'openai'The modules
'fastembed'and'openai'cannot be found, leading to build failures and runtime errors.Please ensure that these dependencies are installed and listed under
dependenciesin yourpackage.jsonfile.# Install the missing dependencies npm install fastembed openai🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 12-12: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 13-13: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.fullstack-gen.spec.ts (2)
193-200: Remove unnecessary empty line for better code organization.While the content type checking and formatting logic is good, there's an unnecessary empty line that can be removed.
if (resultData) { const content = typeof resultData === 'object' ? objectToMarkdown(resultData) : resultData; - writeToFile(logFolderPath, `${node.name}`, content);
205-212: Enhance error message for better debugging.While the structured error output is good, the error message could be more descriptive.
writeToFile( logFolderPath, `${node.name}-error`, objectToMarkdown({ - error: 'No result data', + error: `No result data available for node ${node.name}`, metrics: nodeMetrics, }), );backend/src/build-system/__tests__/utils.ts (2)
51-54: Enhance type safety and input validation.While the function handles basic type checking, it could benefit from stronger TypeScript typing and validation.
- export function objectToMarkdown(obj: any, depth = 1): string { + export function objectToMarkdown(obj: Record<string, unknown> | unknown[] | unknown, depth = 1): string { - if (!obj || typeof obj !== 'object') { + if (obj === null || obj === undefined || typeof obj !== 'object') { return String(obj); }
67-77: Improve markdown formatting for arrays.The current implementation could be enhanced by adding bullet points for array items to improve readability in the generated markdown.
} else if (Array.isArray(value)) { markdown += value .map((item) => { if (typeof item === 'object') { - return objectToMarkdown(item, depth + 1); + return `- ${objectToMarkdown(item, depth + 1).trim()}`; } - return String(item); + return `- ${String(item)}`; }) .join('\n') + '\n';backend/src/embedding/openai-embbeding-provider.ts (2)
10-10: Remove Unnecessary Static Property 'openAi'The static property
static openAi: any;declared on line 10 is redundant since you have an instance propertyprivate openAi: OpenAI;.You can safely remove the static
openAiproperty to clean up the class definition.-import openai, { OpenAI } from 'openai'; +import { OpenAI } from 'openai'; ... - static openAi: any;
24-30: Remove Unnecessary Console LogLogging the embedding data directly to the console may expose sensitive information and clutter the output.
Consider removing the console log or using the logger with an appropriate log level.
}); - console.log(embedding.data[0].embedding);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.fullstack-gen.spec.ts(7 hunks)backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.model-provider.spec.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/__tests__/utils.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/requirements-document/index.ts(3 hunks)backend/src/config/config-loader.ts(0 hunks)backend/src/embedding/__tests__/loadAllEmbModels.spec.ts(3 hunks)backend/src/embedding/openai-embbeding-provider.ts(1 hunks)llm-server/src/emb-provider.ts(0 hunks)llm-server/src/embedding/emb-provider.ts(0 hunks)llm-server/src/embedding/openai-embedding-provider.ts(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- llm-server/src/embedding/emb-provider.ts
- backend/src/config/config-loader.ts
- llm-server/src/embedding/openai-embedding-provider.ts
- llm-server/src/emb-provider.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- backend/src/build-system/tests/test.model-provider.spec.ts
- backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/requirements-document/index.ts
- backend/src/embedding/tests/loadAllEmbModels.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run tests and upload coverage
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.fullstack-gen.spec.ts
[error] 249-255: Sequence execution failed due to connection refused error (ECONNREFUSED) when trying to connect to localhost:3001
backend/src/embedding/openai-embbeding-provider.ts
[error] 2-3: Missing dependencies: Cannot find modules 'fastembed' and 'openai'
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
backend/src/embedding/openai-embbeding-provider.ts
[error] 12-12: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 13-13: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.fullstack-gen.spec.ts (1)
6-6: LGTM! Node names are now more descriptive and consistent.The updated node names provide better clarity about each node's purpose in the build sequence. The addition of
objectToMarkdownimport aligns with the new formatting requirements.Also applies to: 31-31, 42-42, 70-70, 87-87, 107-107
backend/src/embedding/openai-embbeding-provider.ts (1)
35-40:⚠️ Potential issueCorrect Model List Retrieval and Filtering
There are issues with how the models are retrieved and filtered:
modelsshould accessmodels.datato get the list of models.- Filtering by
model.object === 'embedding'may not correctly identify embedding models.Update the code to properly access and filter the list of embedding models:
const models = await this.openAi.models.list(); -const modelList = Object.values(models).filter( - (model) => model.object === 'embedding', +const modelList = models.data.filter( + (model) => model.id.includes('embedding'), ); this.logger.log(`Models fetched: ${modelList.length}`);Run the following script to verify the available embedding models and their properties:
| this.openAi = new OpenAI({ | ||
| apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY, | ||
| }); | ||
| }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle Missing OpenAI API Key
In the constructor, there is no check to ensure that the OPENAI_API_KEY environment variable is set. This could lead to unexpected errors at runtime.
Add a check to handle the absence of the API key:
constructor() {
+ if (!process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY) {
+ this.logger.error('OPENAI_API_KEY is not defined in environment variables.');
+ throw new Error('OPENAI_API_KEY is required but was not found.');
+ }
this.openAi = new OpenAI({
apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY,
});
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| if (this.instance) { | ||
| return this.instance; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid Using 'this' in Static Methods
Using this inside static methods can be confusing because this refers to the class itself, not an instance. It's clearer to use the class name directly.
Apply this diff to replace this with the class name OpenAIEmbProvider:
static getInstance() {
- if (this.instance) {
+ if (OpenAIEmbProvider.instance) {
- return this.instance;
+ return OpenAIEmbProvider.instance;
}
- return new OpenAIEmbProvider();
+ OpenAIEmbProvider.instance = new OpenAIEmbProvider();
+ return OpenAIEmbProvider.instance;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (this.instance) { | |
| return this.instance; | |
| if (OpenAIEmbProvider.instance) { | |
| return OpenAIEmbProvider.instance; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 12-12: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 13-13: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
… struct output (#88) Co-authored-by: ZHallen122 <106571949+ZHallen122@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-arch/index.ts (1)
45-45: Consider implementing a global retry mechanism.The TODO comment indicates a need for a better retry mechanism. This could be abstracted into a reusable utility to maintain consistency across handlers.
Would you like me to help design a global retry mechanism that could be used across all handlers?
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-generate-doc.spec.ts (1)
78-80: Proper error handling for sequence executionThe updated error handling checks if
result.successis falsy and throwsresult.error. Ensure thatresult.errorcontains meaningful error information. Additionally, consider whether thetry...catchblock is necessary ifexecuteBuildSequencealready handles errors internally.backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.fullstack-gen.spec.ts (5)
2-2: Remove unused importwriteToFileThe
writeToFilefunction is imported but not used in this file. Unused imports can clutter the code and may lead to confusion.Apply this diff to remove the unused import:
-import { executeBuildSequence, objectToMarkdown, writeToFile } from './utils'; +import { executeBuildSequence, objectToMarkdown } from './utils';
20-20: Standardize node names for consistencyThe node name has been updated to
'Project Folders Setup'. Ensure that this naming convention is consistent across all nodes for clarity and maintainability.
59-59: Consistency in node naming:UX DataMap Document NodeThere is an inconsistent camel-casing of
DataMap. Ensure thatDataMapis consistently cased throughout the codebase to avoid confusion.Apply this diff for consistency:
- name: 'UX DataMap Document Node', + name: 'UX Data Map Document Node',
76-76: Clarify node name forop:FILE:STRUCTThe node name is now
'File Structure Generation'. Confirm that this accurately describes the node's purpose and is consistent with other naming conventions.
101-101: Clarify the node name'File Arch'The node
'op:FILE:ARCH'has the name'File Arch'. It's unclear what'File Arch'stands for. Consider renaming it to a more descriptive name, such as'File Architecture Generation', for better readability.Apply this diff to update the node name:
- name: 'File Arch', + name: 'File Architecture Generation',backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/sitemap-structure/sms-page.ts (3)
45-45: Typo in Function NamegenerateLevel2UXSiteMapStructrePromptThe function name
generateLevel2UXSiteMapStructrePromptappears to have a typo in "Structre". It should begenerateLevel2UXSiteMapStructurePrompt.Apply this diff to correct the typo:
-const prompt = prompts.generateLevel2UXSiteMapStructrePrompt( +const prompt = prompts.generateLevel2UXSiteMapStructurePrompt(
49-49: Address the TODO Comment for Dynamic PlatformThere's a TODO comment indicating the platform
'web'should be replaced with a dynamic value if necessary. Implementing this will make the code more flexible for different platforms.I can help modify the code to accept the platform as a parameter or retrieve it from the context. Would you like me to provide a solution or open a new GitHub issue to track this task?
88-88: Consider Refactoring Assignment inwhileConditionThe assignment within the
whileloop condition (while ((match = regex.exec(text)) !== null)) may be confusing, as assignments inside conditions can reduce readability. Consider refactoring for clarity.You could separate the assignment from the condition:
let match = regex.exec(text); while (match !== null) { const title = match[1].trim(); const content = match[2].trim(); sections.push({ title, content }); match = regex.exec(text); }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 88-88: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
backend/src/build-system/types.ts (1)
79-87: Enhance Comments with Examples forFileStructOutputThe comments for the
FileStructOutputinterface mention examples, but they are incomplete or missing. Providing clear examples will improve understanding for future developers.Consider updating the comments as follows:
/** * Tree File Structure: - * src: - * - components: + * Example: + * src/ + * ├── components/ + * │ ├── Header.tsx + * │ └── Footer.tsx + * └── pages/ + * └── Home.tsx *//** * Example JSON file structure: - * + * { + * "src": { + * "components": ["Header.tsx", "Footer.tsx"], + * "pages": ["Home.tsx"] + * } + * } */backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/sitemap-structure/index.ts (1)
40-42: Consider validating the model output before processingThe output is directly processed without validation.
Add validation before processing:
+ if (!uxStructureContent || typeof uxStructureContent !== 'string') { + return { + success: false, + error: new Error('Invalid model output format'), + }; + } + return { success: true, data: removeCodeBlockFences(uxStructureContent), };backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-structure/index.ts (2)
161-164: Validate model outputs before processingBoth
fileStructureContentandfileStructureJsonContentare processed without validation.Add validation before processing:
+ if (!fileStructureContent || !fileStructureJsonContent) { + return { + success: false, + error: new Error('Invalid model output format'), + }; + } + return { success: true, data: { fileStructure: removeCodeBlockFences(fileStructureContent), jsonFileStructure: removeCodeBlockFences(fileStructureJsonContent), }, };
Line range hint
108-149: Extract retry logic to a reusable utilityThe retry logic for virtual directory building could be made reusable.
Consider extracting to a utility function:
async function withRetry<T>( operation: () => Promise<T>, validate: (result: T) => boolean, options: { retryChances?: number; onRetry?: (attempt: number, maxAttempts: number) => void; errorMessage?: string; } = {} ): Promise<BuildResult<T>> { const { retryChances = 2, onRetry, errorMessage = 'Operation failed after multiple attempts' } = options; let attempt = 0; while (attempt <= retryChances) { try { const result = await operation(); if (validate(result)) { return { success: true, data: result }; } } catch (error) { if (attempt === retryChances) { return { success: false, error: new Error(errorMessage) }; } } if (onRetry) { onRetry(attempt + 1, retryChances); } attempt++; } return { success: false, error: new Error(errorMessage) }; }This would simplify the retry logic in the handler:
const result = await withRetry( async () => { const jsonContent = await context.model.chatSync({...}); const success = context.buildVirtualDirectory(jsonContent); return { jsonContent, success }; }, (result) => result.success, { onRetry: (attempt, max) => { this.logger.warn(`Retrying to build virtual directory (${attempt}/${max})...`); } } );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-database-schemas.spec.ts(0 hunks)backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-generate-doc.spec.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.fullstack-gen.spec.ts(7 hunks)backend/src/build-system/__tests__/utils.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-arch/index.ts(5 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-structure/index.ts(5 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/sitemap-structure/index.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/sitemap-structure/sms-page.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/hanlder-manager.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/types.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- backend/src/build-system/tests/test-database-schemas.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/sitemap-structure/sms-page.ts
[error] 88-88: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
🔇 Additional comments (15)
backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-arch/index.ts (4)
5-9: LGTM! Import changes align with the new standardized approach.The new utility imports support the standardization of model response handling across handlers.
64-65: LGTM! Improved JSON extraction process.The new approach using
parseGenerateTagfollowed byextractJsonFromTextprovides a more standardized way of handling model responses.Also applies to: 69-69
93-93: LGTM! Consistent response formatting.Using
formatResponseensures standardized output across all handlers.
59-62: Verify the model name 'gpt-4o-mini'.The model name appears unusual. Should it be 'gpt-4' or another standard model name?
Let's check other model usages in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
The model name 'gpt-4o-mini' appears to be correct
This model name is used consistently across multiple handlers in the build system, indicating it's an intentional choice specific to this codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for model name patterns in the codebase rg -i "model:.*gpt" --type tsLength of output: 1652
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-generate-doc.spec.ts (4)
2-2: Verify the existence and correct export ofexecuteBuildSequenceThe import statement adds
executeBuildSequencefrom'./utils'. Ensure that theutilsmodule exists at the specified path and thatexecuteBuildSequenceis properly exported. This prevents potentialModuleNotFoundErroror undefined import issues.
8-11: Update the sequence identifiers and descriptions for consistencyThe
id,name, anddescriptionof the sequence have been changed:
id:'test-backend-sequence'name:'Spotify-like Music Web'description:'Users can play music'Ensure that these updates are intended and consistent with other test sequences. Also, verify that any references to the old
idhave been updated to prevent mismatches.
56-60: Ensure the new node'op:UX:SMS:LEVEL2'is implementedA new node has been added:
id:'op:UX:SMS:LEVEL2'name:'UX SMD LEVEL 2 Page Details Node'Verify that the handler for
'op:UX:SMS:LEVEL2'is implemented and correctly registered in the build system. This ensures that the node can execute without errors during the sequence.
68-71: Update sequence execution to useexecuteBuildSequenceReplacing direct context execution with
executeBuildSequencecentralizes the execution logic and enhances code maintainability. This abstraction simplifies the test and allows for reuse of the execution pattern.backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.fullstack-gen.spec.ts (3)
31-31: Correct naming of the PRD nodeThe node name changed to
'Project Requirements Document Node'. Verify that this accurately reflects the node's functionality and aligns with naming conventions used elsewhere.
83-86: Verify implementation of the new nodeop:UX:SMS:LEVEL2A new node has been added:
id:'op:UX:SMS:LEVEL2'name:'Level 2 UX Sitemap Structure Node details'requires:['op:UX:SMS']Ensure that:
- The node handler for
'op:UX:SMS:LEVEL2'is implemented and correctly registered.- The dependency
'op:UX:SMS'is correctly specified and will be executed prior to this node.
143-147: Ensure result handling after sequence executionAfter executing the build sequence, the result is checked for success, and metrics are validated. Make sure that
result.metricsprovides all necessary information for subsequent analysis. Additionally, consider handling possible errors or exceptions that might occur during the execution.backend/src/build-system/__tests__/utils.ts (2)
54-87: Efficient conversion of objects to MarkdownThe
objectToMarkdownfunction effectively converts objects to Markdown format, handling nested objects and arrays. This utility enhances the readability of logged data.
89-94: DefineTestResultinterface for consistent result handlingDefining the
TestResultinterface standardizes the structure of results returned byexecuteBuildSequence. This improves type safety and code readability.backend/src/build-system/types.ts (1)
97-97: Ensure Consumers Handle UpdatedFileStructOutputTypeThe type of
'op:FILE:STRUCT'inNodeOutputMaphas been changed fromstringtoFileStructOutput. Please verify that all consumers of this output have been updated to handle the new structure to prevent potential runtime errors.You can run the following script to find and review all usages of
'op:FILE:STRUCT':✅ Verification successful
Type Change is Safe - No Consumer Updates Required
The change from
stringtoFileStructOutputis safe as the only consumer (file-archhandler) performs just a null check without accessing any specific properties. No updates to consumers are necessary.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of 'op:FILE:STRUCT' in the codebase. rg -A 5 "'op:FILE:STRUCT'"Length of output: 3539
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check FileStructOutput type definition and its usage in consumer ast-grep --pattern 'type FileStructOutput = $_' ast-grep --pattern 'interface FileStructOutput { $$$ }' # Show how file-arch handler uses the output rg -B 5 -A 10 "const fileStructure = context\.getNodeData\('op:FILE:STRUCT'\)" backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-arch/index.tsLength of output: 1534
backend/src/build-system/hanlder-manager.ts (1)
39-39: Ensure Unique Handler IDsWhen adding
Level2UXSitemapStructureHandlerto thebuiltInHandlers, confirm that itsidis unique within the system to prevent conflicts.You can check for duplicate IDs using the following script:
If the script outputs any IDs, those are duplicates and should be resolved.
✅ Verification successful
Handler IDs are Unique and Well-Structured
The
Level2UXSitemapStructureHandleruses ID 'op:UX:SMS:LEVEL2' which is unique and follows a clear hierarchical pattern from its parent handler 'op:UX:SMS'.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for duplicate handler IDs. grep -r "readonly id" ./handlers/ | sed 's/.*id = //' | sort | uniq -dLength of output: 117
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, find all TypeScript files that might contain handlers fd -e ts . backend/src # Then, use ast-grep to find handler classes with their IDs ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ { readonly id = $_; }' # Specifically look for Level2UXSitemapStructureHandler ast-grep --pattern 'class Level2UXSitemapStructureHandler { $$$ }'Length of output: 5589
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for handler implementations in the sitemap structure directory cat backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/sitemap-structure/index.ts # Use ast-grep with TypeScript-specific pattern ast-grep --pattern 'export class $_ implements $_ { readonly id: string = $_; }'Length of output: 1584
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check handler manager implementation cat backend/src/build-system/hanlder-manager.ts # Search for Level2 handler implementation fd -e ts -e js Level2UXSitemapStructureHandler backend/srcLength of output: 2889
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Level2 handler implementation cat backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/sitemap-structure/sms-page.tsLength of output: 3114
| export async function executeBuildSequence( | ||
| name: string, | ||
| sequence: BuildSequence, | ||
| ): Promise<TestResult> { | ||
| const timestamp = new Date().toISOString().replace(/[:.]/g, '-'); | ||
| const logFolderPath = `./logs/${name.toLocaleLowerCase().replaceAll(' ', '-')}-${timestamp}`; | ||
| fs.mkdirSync(logFolderPath, { recursive: true }); | ||
|
|
||
| const context = new BuilderContext(sequence, 'test-env'); | ||
| const monitor = BuildMonitor.getInstance(); | ||
|
|
||
| try { | ||
| console.time('Total Execution Time'); | ||
| await context.execute(); | ||
| console.timeEnd('Total Execution Time'); | ||
|
|
||
| const monitorReport = monitor.generateTextReport(sequence.id); | ||
| fs.writeFileSync( | ||
| path.join(logFolderPath, 'execution-metrics.txt'), | ||
| monitorReport, | ||
| 'utf8', | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const sequenceMetrics = monitor.getSequenceMetrics(sequence.id); | ||
| if (sequenceMetrics) { | ||
| const metricsJson = { | ||
| totalDuration: `${sequenceMetrics.duration}ms`, | ||
| successRate: `${sequenceMetrics.successRate.toFixed(2)}%`, | ||
| totalSteps: sequenceMetrics.totalSteps, | ||
| completedSteps: sequenceMetrics.completedSteps, | ||
| failedSteps: sequenceMetrics.failedSteps, | ||
| totalNodes: sequenceMetrics.totalNodes, | ||
| startTime: new Date(sequenceMetrics.startTime).toISOString(), | ||
| endTime: new Date(sequenceMetrics.endTime).toISOString(), | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| fs.writeFileSync( | ||
| path.join(logFolderPath, 'metrics.json'), | ||
| JSON.stringify(metricsJson, null, 2), | ||
| 'utf8', | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| console.log('\nSequence Metrics:'); | ||
| console.table(metricsJson); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for (const step of sequence.steps) { | ||
| const stepMetrics = sequenceMetrics?.stepMetrics.get(step.id); | ||
| for (const node of step.nodes) { | ||
| const resultData = await context.getNodeData(node.id); | ||
| const nodeMetrics = stepMetrics?.nodeMetrics.get(node.id); | ||
|
|
||
| if (resultData) { | ||
| const content = | ||
| typeof resultData === 'object' | ||
| ? objectToMarkdown(resultData) | ||
| : resultData; | ||
| writeToFile(logFolderPath, `${node.name}`, content); | ||
| } else { | ||
| console.error( | ||
| `Error: Handler ${node.name} failed to produce result data`, | ||
| ); | ||
| writeToFile( | ||
| logFolderPath, | ||
| `${node.name}-error`, | ||
| objectToMarkdown({ | ||
| error: 'No result data', | ||
| metrics: nodeMetrics, | ||
| }), | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const summary = { | ||
| timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), | ||
| sequenceId: sequence.id, | ||
| sequenceName: sequence.name, | ||
| totalExecutionTime: `${sequenceMetrics?.duration}ms`, | ||
| successRate: `${sequenceMetrics?.successRate.toFixed(2)}%`, | ||
| nodesExecuted: sequenceMetrics?.totalNodes, | ||
| completedNodes: sequenceMetrics?.stepMetrics.size, | ||
| logFolder: logFolderPath, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| fs.writeFileSync( | ||
| path.join(logFolderPath, 'execution-summary.json'), | ||
| JSON.stringify(summary, null, 2), | ||
| 'utf8', | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| success: true, | ||
| logFolderPath, | ||
| metrics: sequenceMetrics, | ||
| }; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| const errorReport = { | ||
| error: { | ||
| message: error.message, | ||
| stack: error.stack, | ||
| }, | ||
| metrics: monitor.getSequenceMetrics(sequence.id), | ||
| timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| fs.writeFileSync( | ||
| path.join(logFolderPath, 'error-with-metrics.json'), | ||
| JSON.stringify(errorReport, null, 2), | ||
| 'utf8', | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| console.error('\nError during sequence execution:'); | ||
| console.error(error); | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| success: false, | ||
| logFolderPath, | ||
| error: error as Error, | ||
| metrics: monitor.getSequenceMetrics(sequence.id), | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Robust implementation of executeBuildSequence function
The executeBuildSequence function introduces several enhancements:
- Creates a timestamped log folder for organizing logs.
- Executes the build sequence within a
try...catchblock to handle errors gracefully. - Generates and writes metrics and summaries to files.
- Logs detailed error reports, including stack traces and metrics.
Suggestions:
-
Error Handling Enhancements:
In the
catchblock, consider logging the error message and stack trace separately for clarity. Additionally, ensure sensitive information is not logged to prevent potential security issues. -
Avoid Synchronous File Operations:
The use of synchronous file operations (e.g.,
fs.writeFileSync) may block the event loop. For a performant and scalable application, consider using asynchronous versions likefs.promises.writeFile.
Example of using asynchronous file operations:
- fs.writeFileSync(filePath, data, 'utf8');
+ await fs.promises.writeFile(filePath, data, 'utf8');Ensure Error Information is Comprehensive:
Verify that the error reports include all relevant information needed for debugging, without exposing sensitive data.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export async function executeBuildSequence( | |
| name: string, | |
| sequence: BuildSequence, | |
| ): Promise<TestResult> { | |
| const timestamp = new Date().toISOString().replace(/[:.]/g, '-'); | |
| const logFolderPath = `./logs/${name.toLocaleLowerCase().replaceAll(' ', '-')}-${timestamp}`; | |
| fs.mkdirSync(logFolderPath, { recursive: true }); | |
| const context = new BuilderContext(sequence, 'test-env'); | |
| const monitor = BuildMonitor.getInstance(); | |
| try { | |
| console.time('Total Execution Time'); | |
| await context.execute(); | |
| console.timeEnd('Total Execution Time'); | |
| const monitorReport = monitor.generateTextReport(sequence.id); | |
| fs.writeFileSync( | |
| path.join(logFolderPath, 'execution-metrics.txt'), | |
| monitorReport, | |
| 'utf8', | |
| ); | |
| const sequenceMetrics = monitor.getSequenceMetrics(sequence.id); | |
| if (sequenceMetrics) { | |
| const metricsJson = { | |
| totalDuration: `${sequenceMetrics.duration}ms`, | |
| successRate: `${sequenceMetrics.successRate.toFixed(2)}%`, | |
| totalSteps: sequenceMetrics.totalSteps, | |
| completedSteps: sequenceMetrics.completedSteps, | |
| failedSteps: sequenceMetrics.failedSteps, | |
| totalNodes: sequenceMetrics.totalNodes, | |
| startTime: new Date(sequenceMetrics.startTime).toISOString(), | |
| endTime: new Date(sequenceMetrics.endTime).toISOString(), | |
| }; | |
| fs.writeFileSync( | |
| path.join(logFolderPath, 'metrics.json'), | |
| JSON.stringify(metricsJson, null, 2), | |
| 'utf8', | |
| ); | |
| console.log('\nSequence Metrics:'); | |
| console.table(metricsJson); | |
| } | |
| for (const step of sequence.steps) { | |
| const stepMetrics = sequenceMetrics?.stepMetrics.get(step.id); | |
| for (const node of step.nodes) { | |
| const resultData = await context.getNodeData(node.id); | |
| const nodeMetrics = stepMetrics?.nodeMetrics.get(node.id); | |
| if (resultData) { | |
| const content = | |
| typeof resultData === 'object' | |
| ? objectToMarkdown(resultData) | |
| : resultData; | |
| writeToFile(logFolderPath, `${node.name}`, content); | |
| } else { | |
| console.error( | |
| `Error: Handler ${node.name} failed to produce result data`, | |
| ); | |
| writeToFile( | |
| logFolderPath, | |
| `${node.name}-error`, | |
| objectToMarkdown({ | |
| error: 'No result data', | |
| metrics: nodeMetrics, | |
| }), | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| const summary = { | |
| timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), | |
| sequenceId: sequence.id, | |
| sequenceName: sequence.name, | |
| totalExecutionTime: `${sequenceMetrics?.duration}ms`, | |
| successRate: `${sequenceMetrics?.successRate.toFixed(2)}%`, | |
| nodesExecuted: sequenceMetrics?.totalNodes, | |
| completedNodes: sequenceMetrics?.stepMetrics.size, | |
| logFolder: logFolderPath, | |
| }; | |
| fs.writeFileSync( | |
| path.join(logFolderPath, 'execution-summary.json'), | |
| JSON.stringify(summary, null, 2), | |
| 'utf8', | |
| ); | |
| return { | |
| success: true, | |
| logFolderPath, | |
| metrics: sequenceMetrics, | |
| }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| const errorReport = { | |
| error: { | |
| message: error.message, | |
| stack: error.stack, | |
| }, | |
| metrics: monitor.getSequenceMetrics(sequence.id), | |
| timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), | |
| }; | |
| fs.writeFileSync( | |
| path.join(logFolderPath, 'error-with-metrics.json'), | |
| JSON.stringify(errorReport, null, 2), | |
| 'utf8', | |
| ); | |
| console.error('\nError during sequence execution:'); | |
| console.error(error); | |
| return { | |
| success: false, | |
| logFolderPath, | |
| error: error as Error, | |
| metrics: monitor.getSequenceMetrics(sequence.id), | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| export async function executeBuildSequence( | |
| name: string, | |
| sequence: BuildSequence, | |
| ): Promise<TestResult> { | |
| const timestamp = new Date().toISOString().replace(/[:.]/g, '-'); | |
| const logFolderPath = `./logs/${name.toLocaleLowerCase().replaceAll(' ', '-')}-${timestamp}`; | |
| await fs.promises.mkdir(logFolderPath, { recursive: true }); | |
| const context = new BuilderContext(sequence, 'test-env'); | |
| const monitor = BuildMonitor.getInstance(); | |
| try { | |
| console.time('Total Execution Time'); | |
| await context.execute(); | |
| console.timeEnd('Total Execution Time'); | |
| const monitorReport = monitor.generateTextReport(sequence.id); | |
| await fs.promises.writeFile( | |
| path.join(logFolderPath, 'execution-metrics.txt'), | |
| monitorReport, | |
| 'utf8', | |
| ); | |
| const sequenceMetrics = monitor.getSequenceMetrics(sequence.id); | |
| if (sequenceMetrics) { | |
| const metricsJson = { | |
| totalDuration: `${sequenceMetrics.duration}ms`, | |
| successRate: `${sequenceMetrics.successRate.toFixed(2)}%`, | |
| totalSteps: sequenceMetrics.totalSteps, | |
| completedSteps: sequenceMetrics.completedSteps, | |
| failedSteps: sequenceMetrics.failedSteps, | |
| totalNodes: sequenceMetrics.totalNodes, | |
| startTime: new Date(sequenceMetrics.startTime).toISOString(), | |
| endTime: new Date(sequenceMetrics.endTime).toISOString(), | |
| }; | |
| await fs.promises.writeFile( | |
| path.join(logFolderPath, 'metrics.json'), | |
| JSON.stringify(metricsJson, null, 2), | |
| 'utf8', | |
| ); | |
| console.log('\nSequence Metrics:'); | |
| console.table(metricsJson); | |
| } | |
| for (const step of sequence.steps) { | |
| const stepMetrics = sequenceMetrics?.stepMetrics.get(step.id); | |
| for (const node of step.nodes) { | |
| const resultData = await context.getNodeData(node.id); | |
| const nodeMetrics = stepMetrics?.nodeMetrics.get(node.id); | |
| if (resultData) { | |
| const content = | |
| typeof resultData === 'object' | |
| ? objectToMarkdown(resultData) | |
| : resultData; | |
| await writeToFile(logFolderPath, `${node.name}`, content); | |
| } else { | |
| console.error( | |
| `Error: Handler ${node.name} failed to produce result data`, | |
| ); | |
| await writeToFile( | |
| logFolderPath, | |
| `${node.name}-error`, | |
| objectToMarkdown({ | |
| error: 'No result data', | |
| metrics: nodeMetrics, | |
| }), | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| const summary = { | |
| timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), | |
| sequenceId: sequence.id, | |
| sequenceName: sequence.name, | |
| totalExecutionTime: `${sequenceMetrics?.duration}ms`, | |
| successRate: `${sequenceMetrics?.successRate.toFixed(2)}%`, | |
| nodesExecuted: sequenceMetrics?.totalNodes, | |
| completedNodes: sequenceMetrics?.stepMetrics.size, | |
| logFolder: logFolderPath, | |
| }; | |
| await fs.promises.writeFile( | |
| path.join(logFolderPath, 'execution-summary.json'), | |
| JSON.stringify(summary, null, 2), | |
| 'utf8', | |
| ); | |
| return { | |
| success: true, | |
| logFolderPath, | |
| metrics: sequenceMetrics, | |
| }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| const errorReport = { | |
| error: { | |
| message: error.message, | |
| stack: error.stack, | |
| }, | |
| metrics: monitor.getSequenceMetrics(sequence.id), | |
| timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), | |
| }; | |
| await fs.promises.writeFile( | |
| path.join(logFolderPath, 'error-with-metrics.json'), | |
| JSON.stringify(errorReport, null, 2), | |
| 'utf8', | |
| ); | |
| console.error('\nError during sequence execution:'); | |
| console.error(error); | |
| return { | |
| success: false, | |
| logFolderPath, | |
| error: error as Error, | |
| metrics: monitor.getSequenceMetrics(sequence.id), | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| } |
| const sitemapDoc = context.getNodeData('op:UX:SMS'); | ||
| const uxStructureDoc = context.getNodeData('op:UX:SMS'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Possible Incorrect Data Retrieval for uxStructureDoc
Both sitemapDoc and uxStructureDoc are assigned the value from context.getNodeData('op:UX:SMS'). Is this intentional? If these variables are supposed to contain different data, consider using the appropriate keys for data retrieval to ensure they hold the correct values.
| import { FileGeneratorHandler } from './handlers/file-manager/file-generate'; | ||
| import { BackendRequirementHandler } from './handlers/backend/requirements-document'; | ||
| import { BackendFileReviewHandler } from './handlers/backend/file-review/file-review'; | ||
| import { Level2UXSitemapStructureHandler } from './handlers/ux/sitemap-structure/sms-page'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Confirmed: File Name Typo in hanlder-manager.ts
The file name contains a typo and should be renamed from hanlder-manager.ts to handler-manager.ts. However, the import path for Level2UXSitemapStructureHandler is correct and resolves to the existing file at backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/sitemap-structure/sms-page.ts.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify Import Path for Level2UXSitemapStructureHandler
Ensure that the import path './handlers/ux/sitemap-structure/sms-page' is correct and that the file exists at this location. Typos or incorrect paths can lead to module resolution errors.
You can run the following script to check if the file exists:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of 'sms-page.ts' in the expected directory.
if [ -f "./handlers/ux/sitemap-structure/sms-page.ts" ]; then
echo "sms-page.ts exists in the expected directory."
else
echo "sms-page.ts is missing in './handlers/ux/sitemap-structure/' directory."
fi
Length of output: 215
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar filenames
echo "=== Searching for similar filenames ==="
fd -e ts -e js sms-page
echo -e "\n=== Searching for the class definition ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'class Level2UXSitemapStructureHandler'
echo -e "\n=== Searching for references to the handler ==="
rg "Level2UXSitemapStructureHandler" -t ts -t js
Length of output: 1008
| const uxStructureContent = await context.model.chatSync({ | ||
| model: 'gpt-4o-mini', | ||
| messages: [{ content: prompt, role: 'system' }], | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Verify the model name and add error handling
The model name 'gpt-4o-mini' seems non-standard. Additionally, the chatSync call lacks error handling.
Consider:
- Verifying the correct model name
- Adding try-catch block for error handling:
- const uxStructureContent = await context.model.chatSync({
- model: 'gpt-4o-mini',
- messages: [{ content: prompt, role: 'system' }],
- });
+ let uxStructureContent: string;
+ try {
+ uxStructureContent = await context.model.chatSync({
+ model: 'gpt-4', // Verify correct model name
+ messages: [{ content: prompt, role: 'system' }],
+ });
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error('Error generating UX structure:', error);
+ return {
+ success: false,
+ error: new Error('Failed to generate UX structure'),
+ };
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| fileStructureContent = await context.model.chatSync({ | ||
| model: 'gpt-4o-mini', | ||
| messages: [{ content: prompt, role: 'system' }], | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extract model configuration to reduce duplication
The model configuration is duplicated across two chatSync calls.
Consider extracting the common configuration:
+ private readonly MODEL_CONFIG = {
+ model: 'gpt-4', // Verify correct model name
+ getMessages: (content: string) => [{
+ content,
+ role: 'system' as const
+ }]
+ };
+
async run(
context: BuilderContext,
opts?: BuildOpts,
): Promise<BuildResult<FileStructOutput>> {
// ...
try {
fileStructureContent = await context.model.chatSync({
- model: 'gpt-4o-mini',
- messages: [{ content: prompt, role: 'system' }],
+ ...this.MODEL_CONFIG,
+ messages: this.MODEL_CONFIG.getMessages(prompt)
});
}
// ...
try {
fileStructureJsonContent = await context.model.chatSync({
- model: 'gpt-4o-mini',
- messages: [{ content: convertToJsonPrompt, role: 'system' }],
+ ...this.MODEL_CONFIG,
+ messages: this.MODEL_CONFIG.getMessages(convertToJsonPrompt)
});
}Also applies to: 125-128
before
after
Summary by CodeRabbit
Based on the comprehensive summary of changes, here are the high-level release notes:
Model Interaction Updates
Utility Function Enhancements
Configuration and Logging
Embedding and Provider Changes
Minor Improvements
These changes primarily focus on improving the robustness and flexibility of the model interaction and response processing mechanisms.