Skip to content

findings: add entry for aircompressor #953

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2025
Merged

findings: add entry for aircompressor #953

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2025

Conversation

Marcono1234
Copy link
Contributor

That vulnerability was found through manual code review, and usage of Jazzer in combination with https://github.com/Marcono1234/unsafe-address-sanitizer

@simonresch simonresch self-requested a review September 19, 2025 07:18
simonresch
simonresch approved these changes Sep 19, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@simonresch simonresch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very good find! Thanks for linking it here.

Your unsafe-address-sanitizer looks like a powerful addition to a Jazzer fuzz test.

@simonresch simonresch merged commit 036bf8d into CodeIntelligenceTesting:main Sep 19, 2025
8 checks passed
@Marcono1234 Marcono1234 deleted the aircompressor-findings branch September 21, 2025 11:41
@Marcono1234
Copy link
Contributor Author

Marcono1234 commented Sep 21, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Your unsafe-address-sanitizer looks like a powerful addition to a Jazzer fuzz test.

Thanks for the kind words! Also, since the latest version Jazzer itself supports sanitizing array access through Unsafe (#932).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@simonresch simonresch simonresch approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Marcono1234 @simonresch