Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add arbitrum SDK config #434

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2023
Merged

Conversation

0xEillo
Copy link
Contributor

@0xEillo 0xEillo commented Nov 27, 2023

What does this PR do?

This script adds arbitrum testnet and mainnet to the SDK

Related ticket

Fixes #

Type of change

  • Chore
  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Documentation update

Check list

  • Unit tests for any smart contract change
  • Contracts and functions are documented

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (16668d0) 94.24% compared to head (60158bb) 94.24%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #434   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.24%   94.24%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines         313      313           
  Branches       68       68           
=======================================
  Hits          295      295           
  Misses          9        9           
  Partials        9        9           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@0xEillo 0xEillo marked this pull request as draft November 27, 2023 15:43
@0xEillo 0xEillo marked this pull request as ready for review November 28, 2023 17:13
@alainncls alainncls enabled auto-merge (squash) November 29, 2023 15:23
@alainncls alainncls merged commit 1ebcd37 into dev Nov 29, 2023
8 checks passed
@alainncls alainncls deleted the chore/add-arbitrum-sdk-config branch November 29, 2023 15:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants