ContentMine GitHub profile: no repositories pinned

[ghost]

The list of ContentMine repositories is in no particular order, and frequently changes. This imposes cognitive and time costs on people looking for specific repositories.

ContentMine is not on GitLab and therefore cannot group repositories, but are @ContentMine/administrators OK with me at least pinning the AMI stack modules, WikiFactmine, and other currently-prominent ContentMine repositories (please, tell me which!) to the ContentMine GitHub profile? This is not high priority, but it is very low cost (just a few minutes of time) and would be nice to have.

Obviously, the pins can be updated in the future, if appropriate.

As usual, please give thumbs up if you approve (please name any repos you think should be pinned). And if you think this is a terrible idea, please give constructive criticism.

Thanks!

[tarrow]

Good idea. Leave me to do the WikiFactMine ones thought. There are some I need to migrate from tarrow etc...

…

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:23 PM, modem_down ***@***.***> wrote: The list of ContentMine repositories <https://github.com/contentmine> is in no particular order, and frequently changes. This imposes cognitive and time costs on people looking for specific repositories. ContentMine is not on GitLab <#2> and therefore cannot *group* repositories, but are @ContentMine/administrators <https://github.com/orgs/ContentMine/teams/administrators> OK with me at least pinning <https://github.com/blog/2191-pin-repositories-to-your-github-profile> the AMI stack modules, WikiFactmine, and other currently-prominent ContentMine repositories (please, tell me which!) to the ContentMine GitHub profile? This is not high priority, but it is very low cost (just a few minutes of time) and would be nice to have. Obviously, the pins can be updated in the future, if appropriate. As usual, please give thumbs up if you approve (please name any repos you think should be pinned). And if you think this is a terrible idea, please give constructive criticism. Thanks! — You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#17>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHA02zMapAxubi3sgzD3AXndVnhJKAtYks5sBrJfgaJpZM4NyyB-> .

[petermr]

Thanks, Please just do the AMI-stack on ContentMine (cm-pom and 10 repos). The others are not relevant to the Tilburg project.

…

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:06 AM, My Name ***@***.***> wrote: Good idea. Leave me to do the WikiFactMine ones thought. There are some I need to migrate from tarrow etc... On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:23 PM, modem_down ***@***.***> wrote: > The list of ContentMine repositories <https://github.com/contentmine> is > in no particular order, and frequently changes. This imposes cognitive and > time costs on people looking for specific repositories. > > ContentMine is not on GitLab > <#2> and therefore cannot > *group* repositories, but are @ContentMine/administrators > <https://github.com/orgs/ContentMine/teams/administrators> OK with me at > least pinning > <https://github.com/blog/2191-pin-repositories-to-your-github-profile> > the AMI stack modules, WikiFactmine, and other currently-prominent > ContentMine repositories (please, tell me which!) to the ContentMine GitHub > profile? This is not high priority, but it is very low cost (just a few > minutes of time) and would be nice to have. > > Obviously, the pins can be updated in the future, if appropriate. > > As usual, please give thumbs up if you approve (please name any repos you > think should be pinned). And if you think this is a terrible idea, please > give constructive criticism. > > Thanks! > > — > You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#17>, or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ AHA02zMapAxubi3sgzD3AXndVnhJKAtYks5sBrJfgaJpZM4NyyB-> > . > — You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#17 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAsxS3wuR1tRBUEo-w61UlPLfHKO6i-cks5sB8evgaJpZM4NyyB-> .

-- Peter Murray-Rust Reader Emeritus University of Cambridge +44-1223-763069 and ContentMine Ltd

[ghost]

On further thought: to avoid creating a huge list of pinned repos that might not be much better than the existing list, perhaps we ought to just just to pin one repo per project, and have that project's README link to the other repositories for the project.

For example:

• from AMI, we could pin cm-pom (or AMI), and have that link to the others;
• from wikifactmine, we could pin wikifactmine-api, and have that link to the others;

etc. Sound good?

[ghost]

Re-opening, as issue has not been resolved and seems to have been closed erroneously. (Cf. #5 (comment) .)