Update main.yml #2

xuanhoa8687 · 2020-03-10T03:56:35Z

I want to update to G977B version

evdenis · 2020-03-11T11:22:33Z

You can do it in your fork.

commit 9002b21465fa4d829edfc94a5a441005cffaa972 upstream. Commit 32a5ad9c2285 ("sysctl: handle overflow for file-max") hooked up min/max values for the file-max sysctl parameter via the .extra1 and .extra2 fields in the corresponding struct ctl_table entry. Unfortunately, the minimum value points at the global 'zero' variable, which is an int. This results in a KASAN splat when accessed as a long by proc_doulongvec_minmax on 64-bit architectures: | BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x5d8/0x6a0 | Read of size 8 at addr ffff2000133d1c20 by task systemd/1 | | CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 5.1.0-rc3-00012-g40b114779944 CruelKernel#2 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | Call trace: | dump_backtrace+0x0/0x228 | show_stack+0x14/0x20 | dump_stack+0xe8/0x124 | print_address_description+0x60/0x258 | kasan_report+0x140/0x1a0 | __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x18/0x20 | __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x5d8/0x6a0 | proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x4c/0x78 | proc_sys_call_handler.isra.19+0x144/0x1d8 | proc_sys_write+0x34/0x58 | __vfs_write+0x54/0xe8 | vfs_write+0x124/0x3c0 | ksys_write+0xbc/0x168 | __arm64_sys_write+0x68/0x98 | el0_svc_common+0x100/0x258 | el0_svc_handler+0x48/0xc0 | el0_svc+0x8/0xc | | The buggy address belongs to the variable: | zero+0x0/0x40 | | Memory state around the buggy address: | ffff2000133d1b00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa | ffff2000133d1b80: fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa | >ffff2000133d1c00: fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 | ^ | ffff2000133d1c80: fa fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 | ffff2000133d1d00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Fix the splat by introducing a unsigned long 'zero_ul' and using that instead. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190403153409.17307-1-will.deacon@arm.com Fixes: 32a5ad9c2285 ("sysctl: handle overflow for file-max") Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Matteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit 7494cec6cb3ba7385a6a223b81906384f15aae34 ] Calling kvm_is_visible_gfn() implies that we're parsing the memslots, and doing this without the srcu lock is frown upon: [12704.164532] ============================= [12704.164544] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [12704.164560] 5.1.0-rc1-00008-g600025238f51-dirty CruelKernel#16 Tainted: G W [12704.164573] ----------------------------- [12704.164589] ./include/linux/kvm_host.h:605 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [12704.164602] other info that might help us debug this: [12704.164616] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [12704.164631] 6 locks held by qemu-system-aar/13968: [12704.164644] #0: 000000007ebdae4f (&kvm->lock){+.+.}, at: vgic_its_set_attr+0x244/0x3a0 [12704.164691] #1: 000000007d751022 (&its->its_lock){+.+.}, at: vgic_its_set_attr+0x250/0x3a0 [12704.164726] CruelKernel#2: 00000000219d2706 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0 [12704.164761] CruelKernel#3: 00000000a760aecd (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0 [12704.164794] CruelKernel#4: 000000000ef8e31d (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0 [12704.164827] CruelKernel#5: 000000007a872093 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x64/0xd0 [12704.164861] stack backtrace: [12704.164878] CPU: 2 PID: 13968 Comm: qemu-system-aar Tainted: G W 5.1.0-rc1-00008-g600025238f51-dirty CruelKernel#16 [12704.164887] Hardware name: rockchip evb_rk3399/evb_rk3399, BIOS 2019.04-rc3-00124-g2feec69fb1 03/15/2019 [12704.164896] Call trace: [12704.164910] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x138 [12704.164920] show_stack+0x24/0x30 [12704.164934] dump_stack+0xbc/0x104 [12704.164946] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xcc/0x110 [12704.164958] gfn_to_memslot+0x174/0x190 [12704.164969] kvm_is_visible_gfn+0x28/0x70 [12704.164980] vgic_its_check_id.isra.0+0xec/0x1e8 [12704.164991] vgic_its_save_tables_v0+0x1ac/0x330 [12704.165001] vgic_its_set_attr+0x298/0x3a0 [12704.165012] kvm_device_ioctl_attr+0x9c/0xd8 [12704.165022] kvm_device_ioctl+0x8c/0xf8 [12704.165035] do_vfs_ioctl+0xc8/0x960 [12704.165045] ksys_ioctl+0x8c/0xa0 [12704.165055] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38 [12704.165067] el0_svc_common+0xd8/0x138 [12704.165078] el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78 [12704.165089] el0_svc+0x8/0xc Make sure the lock is taken when doing this. Fixes: bf308242ab98 ("KVM: arm/arm64: VGIC/ITS: protect kvm_read_guest() calls with SRCU lock") Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin (Microsoft) <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 47b16820c490149c2923e8474048f2c6e7557cab ] If xace hardware reports a bad version number, the error handling code in ace_setup() calls put_disk(), followed by queue cleanup. However, since the disk data structure has the queue pointer set, put_disk() also cleans and releases the queue. This results in blk_cleanup_queue() accessing an already released data structure, which in turn may result in a crash such as the following. [ 10.681671] BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0x00000040 [ 10.681826] Faulting instruction address: 0xc0431480 [ 10.682072] Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] [ 10.682251] BE PAGE_SIZE=4K PREEMPT Xilinx Virtex440 [ 10.682387] Modules linked in: [ 10.682528] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Tainted: G W 5.0.0-rc6-next-20190218+ CruelKernel#2 [ 10.682733] NIP: c0431480 LR: c043147c CTR: c0422ad8 [ 10.682863] REGS: cf82fbe0 TRAP: 0300 Tainted: G W (5.0.0-rc6-next-20190218+) [ 10.683065] MSR: 00029000 <CE,EE,ME> CR: 22000222 XER: 00000000 [ 10.683236] DEAR: 00000040 ESR: 00000000 [ 10.683236] GPR00: c043147c cf82fc90 cf82ccc0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000002 00000000 [ 10.683236] GPR08: 00000000 00000000 c04310bc 00000000 22000222 00000000 c0002c54 00000000 [ 10.683236] GPR16: 00000000 00000001 c09aa39c c09021b0 c09021dc 00000007 c0a68c08 00000000 [ 10.683236] GPR24: 00000001 ced6d400 ced6dcf0 c0815d9c 00000000 00000000 00000000 cedf0800 [ 10.684331] NIP [c0431480] blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x28/0x114 [ 10.684473] LR [c043147c] blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x24/0x114 [ 10.684602] Call Trace: [ 10.684671] [cf82fc90] [c043147c] blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x24/0x114 (unreliable) [ 10.684854] [cf82fcc0] [c04315bc] blk_mq_run_hw_queues+0x50/0x7c [ 10.685002] [cf82fce0] [c0422b24] blk_set_queue_dying+0x30/0x68 [ 10.685154] [cf82fcf0] [c0423ec0] blk_cleanup_queue+0x34/0x14c [ 10.685306] [cf82fd10] [c054d73c] ace_probe+0x3dc/0x508 [ 10.685445] [cf82fd50] [c052d740] platform_drv_probe+0x4c/0xb8 [ 10.685592] [cf82fd70] [c052abb0] really_probe+0x20c/0x32c [ 10.685728] [cf82fda0] [c052ae58] driver_probe_device+0x68/0x464 [ 10.685877] [cf82fdc0] [c052b500] device_driver_attach+0xb4/0xe4 [ 10.686024] [cf82fde0] [c052b5dc] __driver_attach+0xac/0xfc [ 10.686161] [cf82fe00] [c0528428] bus_for_each_dev+0x80/0xc0 [ 10.686314] [cf82fe30] [c0529b3c] bus_add_driver+0x144/0x234 [ 10.686457] [cf82fe50] [c052c46c] driver_register+0x88/0x15c [ 10.686610] [cf82fe60] [c09de288] ace_init+0x4c/0xac [ 10.686742] [cf82fe80] [c0002730] do_one_initcall+0xac/0x330 [ 10.686888] [cf82fee0] [c09aafd0] kernel_init_freeable+0x34c/0x478 [ 10.687043] [cf82ff30] [c0002c6c] kernel_init+0x18/0x114 [ 10.687188] [cf82ff40] [c000f2f0] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c [ 10.687349] Instruction dump: [ 10.687435] 3863ffd4 4bfffd70 9421ffd0 7c0802a6 93c10028 7c9e2378 93e1002c 38810008 [ 10.687637] 7c7f1b78 90010034 4bfffc25 813f008c <81290040> 75290100 4182002c 80810008 [ 10.688056] ---[ end trace 13c9ff51d41b9d40 ]--- Fix the problem by setting the disk queue pointer to NULL before calling put_disk(). A more comprehensive fix might be to rearrange the code to check the hardware version before initializing data structures, but I don't know if this would have undesirable side effects, and it would increase the complexity of backporting the fix to older kernels. Fixes: 74489a9 ("Add support for Xilinx SystemACE CompactFlash interface") Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit e091eab028f9253eac5c04f9141bbc9d170acab3 upstream. In some cases, ocfs2_iget() reads the data of inode, which has been deleted for some reason. That will make the system panic. So We should judge whether this inode has been deleted, and tell the caller that the inode is a bad inode. For example, the ocfs2 is used as the backed of nfs, and the client is nfsv3. This issue can be reproduced by the following steps. on the nfs server side, ..../patha/pathb Step 1: The process A was scheduled before calling the function fh_verify. Step 2: The process B is removing the 'pathb', and just completed the call to function dput. Then the dentry of 'pathb' has been deleted from the dcache, and all ancestors have been deleted also. The relationship of dentry and inode was deleted through the function hlist_del_init. The following is the call stack. dentry_iput->hlist_del_init(&dentry->d_u.d_alias) At this time, the inode is still in the dcache. Step 3: The process A call the function ocfs2_get_dentry, which get the inode from dcache. Then the refcount of inode is 1. The following is the call stack. nfsd3_proc_getacl->fh_verify->exportfs_decode_fh->fh_to_dentry(ocfs2_get_dentry) Step 4: Dirty pages are flushed by bdi threads. So the inode of 'patha' is evicted, and this directory was deleted. But the inode of 'pathb' can't be evicted, because the refcount of the inode was 1. Step 5: The process A keep running, and call the function reconnect_path(in exportfs_decode_fh), which call function ocfs2_get_parent of ocfs2. Get the block number of parent directory(patha) by the name of ... Then read the data from disk by the block number. But this inode has been deleted, so the system panic. Process A Process B 1. in nfsd3_proc_getacl | 2. | dput 3. fh_to_dentry(ocfs2_get_dentry) | 4. bdi flush dirty cache | 5. ocfs2_iget | [283465.542049] OCFS2: ERROR (device sdp): ocfs2_validate_inode_block: Invalid dinode #580640: OCFS2_VALID_FL not set [283465.545490] Kernel panic - not syncing: OCFS2: (device sdp): panic forced after error [283465.546889] CPU: 5 PID: 12416 Comm: nfsd Tainted: G W 4.1.12-124.18.6.el6uek.bug28762940v3.x86_64 CruelKernel#2 [283465.548382] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 09/21/2015 [283465.549657] 0000000000000000 ffff8800a56fb7b8 ffffffff816e839c ffffffffa0514758 [283465.550392] 000000000008dc20 ffff8800a56fb838 ffffffff816e62d3 0000000000000008 [283465.551056] ffff880000000010 ffff8800a56fb848 ffff8800a56fb7e8 ffff88005df9f000 [283465.551710] Call Trace: [283465.552516] [<ffffffff816e839c>] dump_stack+0x63/0x81 [283465.553291] [<ffffffff816e62d3>] panic+0xcb/0x21b [283465.554037] [<ffffffffa04e66b0>] ocfs2_handle_error+0xf0/0xf0 [ocfs2] [283465.554882] [<ffffffffa04e7737>] __ocfs2_error+0x67/0x70 [ocfs2] [283465.555768] [<ffffffffa049c0f9>] ocfs2_validate_inode_block+0x229/0x230 [ocfs2] [283465.556683] [<ffffffffa047bcbc>] ocfs2_read_blocks+0x46c/0x7b0 [ocfs2] [283465.557408] [<ffffffffa049bed0>] ? ocfs2_inode_cache_io_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ocfs2] [283465.557973] [<ffffffffa049f0eb>] ocfs2_read_inode_block_full+0x3b/0x60 [ocfs2] [283465.558525] [<ffffffffa049f5ba>] ocfs2_iget+0x4aa/0x880 [ocfs2] [283465.559082] [<ffffffffa049146e>] ocfs2_get_parent+0x9e/0x220 [ocfs2] [283465.559622] [<ffffffff81297c05>] reconnect_path+0xb5/0x300 [283465.560156] [<ffffffff81297f46>] exportfs_decode_fh+0xf6/0x2b0 [283465.560708] [<ffffffffa062faf0>] ? nfsd_proc_getattr+0xa0/0xa0 [nfsd] [283465.561262] [<ffffffff810a8196>] ? prepare_creds+0x26/0x110 [283465.561932] [<ffffffffa0630860>] fh_verify+0x350/0x660 [nfsd] [283465.562862] [<ffffffffa0637804>] ? nfsd_cache_lookup+0x44/0x630 [nfsd] [283465.563697] [<ffffffffa063a8b9>] nfsd3_proc_getattr+0x69/0xf0 [nfsd] [283465.564510] [<ffffffffa062cf60>] nfsd_dispatch+0xe0/0x290 [nfsd] [283465.565358] [<ffffffffa05eb892>] ? svc_tcp_adjust_wspace+0x12/0x30 [sunrpc] [283465.566272] [<ffffffffa05ea652>] svc_process_common+0x412/0x6a0 [sunrpc] [283465.567155] [<ffffffffa05eaa03>] svc_process+0x123/0x210 [sunrpc] [283465.568020] [<ffffffffa062c90f>] nfsd+0xff/0x170 [nfsd] [283465.568962] [<ffffffffa062c810>] ? nfsd_destroy+0x80/0x80 [nfsd] [283465.570112] [<ffffffff810a622b>] kthread+0xcb/0xf0 [283465.571099] [<ffffffff810a6160>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180 [283465.572114] [<ffffffff816f11b8>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90 [283465.573156] [<ffffffff810a6160>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1554185919-3010-1-git-send-email-sunny.s.zhang@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Shuning Zhang <sunny.s.zhang@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn> Cc: piaojun <piaojun@huawei.com> Cc: "Gang He" <ghe@suse.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

…cm_qla2xxx_close_session() [ Upstream commit d4023db71108375e4194e92730ba0d32d7f07813 ] This patch avoids that lockdep reports the following warning: ===================================================== WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 5.1.0-rc1-dbg+ CruelKernel#11 Tainted: G W ----------------------------------------------------- rmdir/1478 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: 00000000e7ac4607 (&(&k->k_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: klist_next+0x43/0x1d0 and this task is already holding: 00000000cf0baf5e (&(&ha->tgt.sess_lock)->rlock){-...}, at: tcm_qla2xxx_close_session+0x57/0xb0 [tcm_qla2xxx] which would create a new lock dependency: (&(&ha->tgt.sess_lock)->rlock){-...} -> (&(&k->k_lock)->rlock){+.+.} but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock: (&(&ha->tgt.sess_lock)->rlock){-...} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at: lock_acquire+0xe3/0x200 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x60 qla2x00_fcport_event_handler+0x1f3d/0x22b0 [qla2xxx] qla2x00_async_login_sp_done+0x1dc/0x1f0 [qla2xxx] qla24xx_process_response_queue+0xa37/0x10e0 [qla2xxx] qla24xx_msix_rsp_q+0x79/0xf0 [qla2xxx] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x79/0x3c0 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0xf0 handle_irq_event+0x5a/0x8b handle_edge_irq+0x12c/0x310 handle_irq+0x192/0x20a do_IRQ+0x73/0x160 ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d default_idle+0x23/0x1f0 arch_cpu_idle+0x15/0x20 default_idle_call+0x35/0x40 do_idle+0x2bb/0x2e0 cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x20 start_secondary+0x24d/0x2d0 secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: (&(&k->k_lock)->rlock){+.+.} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at: ... lock_acquire+0xe3/0x200 _raw_spin_lock+0x32/0x50 klist_add_tail+0x33/0xb0 device_add+0x7f4/0xb60 device_create_groups_vargs+0x11c/0x150 device_create_with_groups+0x89/0xb0 vtconsole_class_init+0xb2/0x124 do_one_initcall+0xc5/0x3ce kernel_init_freeable+0x295/0x32e kernel_init+0x11/0x11b ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&(&k->k_lock)->rlock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&(&ha->tgt.sess_lock)->rlock); lock(&(&k->k_lock)->rlock); <Interrupt> lock(&(&ha->tgt.sess_lock)->rlock); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by rmdir/1478: #0: 000000002c7f1ba4 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}, at: mnt_want_write+0x32/0x70 #1: 00000000c85eb147 (&default_group_class[depth - 1]CruelKernel#2/1){+.+.}, at: do_rmdir+0x217/0x2d0 CruelKernel#2: 000000002b164d6f (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){++++}, at: vfs_rmdir+0x7e/0x1d0 CruelKernel#3: 00000000cf0baf5e (&(&ha->tgt.sess_lock)->rlock){-...}, at: tcm_qla2xxx_close_session+0x57/0xb0 [tcm_qla2xxx] the dependencies between HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock and the holding lock: -> (&(&ha->tgt.sess_lock)->rlock){-...} ops: 127 { IN-HARDIRQ-W at: lock_acquire+0xe3/0x200 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x60 qla2x00_fcport_event_handler+0x1f3d/0x22b0 [qla2xxx] qla2x00_async_login_sp_done+0x1dc/0x1f0 [qla2xxx] qla24xx_process_response_queue+0xa37/0x10e0 [qla2xxx] qla24xx_msix_rsp_q+0x79/0xf0 [qla2xxx] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x79/0x3c0 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0xf0 handle_irq_event+0x5a/0x8b handle_edge_irq+0x12c/0x310 handle_irq+0x192/0x20a do_IRQ+0x73/0x160 ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d default_idle+0x23/0x1f0 arch_cpu_idle+0x15/0x20 default_idle_call+0x35/0x40 do_idle+0x2bb/0x2e0 cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x20 start_secondary+0x24d/0x2d0 secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire+0xe3/0x200 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x60 qla2x00_loop_resync+0xb3d/0x2690 [qla2xxx] qla2x00_do_dpc+0xcee/0xf30 [qla2xxx] kthread+0x1d2/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 } ... key at: [<ffffffffa125f700>] __key.62804+0x0/0xfffffffffff7e900 [qla2xxx] ... acquired at: __lock_acquire+0x11ed/0x1b60 lock_acquire+0xe3/0x200 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x60 klist_next+0x43/0x1d0 device_for_each_child+0x96/0x110 scsi_target_block+0x3c/0x40 [scsi_mod] fc_remote_port_delete+0xe7/0x1c0 [scsi_transport_fc] qla2x00_mark_device_lost+0x4d3/0x500 [qla2xxx] qlt_unreg_sess+0x104/0x2c0 [qla2xxx] tcm_qla2xxx_close_session+0xa2/0xb0 [tcm_qla2xxx] target_shutdown_sessions+0x17b/0x190 [target_core_mod] core_tpg_del_initiator_node_acl+0xf3/0x1f0 [target_core_mod] target_fabric_nacl_base_release+0x25/0x30 [target_core_mod] config_item_release+0x9f/0x120 [configfs] config_item_put+0x29/0x2b [configfs] configfs_rmdir+0x3d2/0x520 [configfs] vfs_rmdir+0xb3/0x1d0 do_rmdir+0x25c/0x2d0 __x64_sys_rmdir+0x24/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x77/0x220 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe the dependencies between the lock to be acquired and HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: -> (&(&k->k_lock)->rlock){+.+.} ops: 14568 { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0xe3/0x200 _raw_spin_lock+0x32/0x50 klist_add_tail+0x33/0xb0 device_add+0x7f4/0xb60 device_create_groups_vargs+0x11c/0x150 device_create_with_groups+0x89/0xb0 vtconsole_class_init+0xb2/0x124 do_one_initcall+0xc5/0x3ce kernel_init_freeable+0x295/0x32e kernel_init+0x11/0x11b ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 SOFTIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0xe3/0x200 _raw_spin_lock+0x32/0x50 klist_add_tail+0x33/0xb0 device_add+0x7f4/0xb60 device_create_groups_vargs+0x11c/0x150 device_create_with_groups+0x89/0xb0 vtconsole_class_init+0xb2/0x124 do_one_initcall+0xc5/0x3ce kernel_init_freeable+0x295/0x32e kernel_init+0x11/0x11b ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire+0xe3/0x200 _raw_spin_lock+0x32/0x50 klist_add_tail+0x33/0xb0 device_add+0x7f4/0xb60 device_create_groups_vargs+0x11c/0x150 device_create_with_groups+0x89/0xb0 vtconsole_class_init+0xb2/0x124 do_one_initcall+0xc5/0x3ce kernel_init_freeable+0x295/0x32e kernel_init+0x11/0x11b ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 } ... key at: [<ffffffff83f3d900>] __key.15805+0x0/0x40 ... acquired at: __lock_acquire+0x11ed/0x1b60 lock_acquire+0xe3/0x200 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x60 klist_next+0x43/0x1d0 device_for_each_child+0x96/0x110 scsi_target_block+0x3c/0x40 [scsi_mod] fc_remote_port_delete+0xe7/0x1c0 [scsi_transport_fc] qla2x00_mark_device_lost+0x4d3/0x500 [qla2xxx] qlt_unreg_sess+0x104/0x2c0 [qla2xxx] tcm_qla2xxx_close_session+0xa2/0xb0 [tcm_qla2xxx] target_shutdown_sessions+0x17b/0x190 [target_core_mod] core_tpg_del_initiator_node_acl+0xf3/0x1f0 [target_core_mod] target_fabric_nacl_base_release+0x25/0x30 [target_core_mod] config_item_release+0x9f/0x120 [configfs] config_item_put+0x29/0x2b [configfs] configfs_rmdir+0x3d2/0x520 [configfs] vfs_rmdir+0xb3/0x1d0 do_rmdir+0x25c/0x2d0 __x64_sys_rmdir+0x24/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x77/0x220 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe stack backtrace: CPU: 7 PID: 1478 Comm: rmdir Tainted: G W 5.1.0-rc1-dbg+ CruelKernel#11 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x86/0xca check_usage.cold.59+0x473/0x563 check_prev_add.constprop.43+0x1f1/0x1170 __lock_acquire+0x11ed/0x1b60 lock_acquire+0xe3/0x200 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x60 klist_next+0x43/0x1d0 device_for_each_child+0x96/0x110 scsi_target_block+0x3c/0x40 [scsi_mod] fc_remote_port_delete+0xe7/0x1c0 [scsi_transport_fc] qla2x00_mark_device_lost+0x4d3/0x500 [qla2xxx] qlt_unreg_sess+0x104/0x2c0 [qla2xxx] tcm_qla2xxx_close_session+0xa2/0xb0 [tcm_qla2xxx] target_shutdown_sessions+0x17b/0x190 [target_core_mod] core_tpg_del_initiator_node_acl+0xf3/0x1f0 [target_core_mod] target_fabric_nacl_base_release+0x25/0x30 [target_core_mod] config_item_release+0x9f/0x120 [configfs] config_item_put+0x29/0x2b [configfs] configfs_rmdir+0x3d2/0x520 [configfs] vfs_rmdir+0xb3/0x1d0 do_rmdir+0x25c/0x2d0 __x64_sys_rmdir+0x24/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x77/0x220 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Cc: Himanshu Madhani <hmadhani@marvell.com> Cc: Giridhar Malavali <gmalavali@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Acked-by: Himanshu Madhani <hmadhani@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit ff612ba7849964b1898fd3ccd1f56941129c6aab ] We've been seeing the following sporadically throughout our fleet panic: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4584! netversion: 5.0-0 Backtrace: #0 [ffffc90003adb880] machine_kexec at ffffffff81041da8 #1 [ffffc90003adb8c8] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8110396c CruelKernel#2 [ffffc90003adb988] crash_kexec at ffffffff811048ad CruelKernel#3 [ffffc90003adb9a0] oops_end at ffffffff8101c19a CruelKernel#4 [ffffc90003adb9c0] do_trap at ffffffff81019114 CruelKernel#5 [ffffc90003adba00] do_error_trap at ffffffff810195d0 CruelKernel#6 [ffffc90003adbab0] invalid_op at ffffffff81a00a9b [exception RIP: btrfs_reloc_cow_block+692] RIP: ffffffff8143b614 RSP: ffffc90003adbb68 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: fffffffffffffff7 RBX: ffff8806b9c32000 RCX: ffff8806aad00690 RDX: ffff880850b295e0 RSI: ffff8806b9c32000 RDI: ffff88084f205bd0 RBP: ffff880849415000 R8: ffffc90003adbbe0 R9: ffff88085ac90000 R10: ffff8805f7369140 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880850b295e0 R13: ffff88084f205bd0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 CruelKernel#7 [ffffc90003adbbb0] __btrfs_cow_block at ffffffff813bf1cd CruelKernel#8 [ffffc90003adbc28] btrfs_cow_block at ffffffff813bf4b3 CruelKernel#9 [ffffc90003adbc78] btrfs_search_slot at ffffffff813c2e6c The way relocation moves data extents is by creating a reloc inode and preallocating extents in this inode and then copying the data into these preallocated extents. Once we've done this for all of our extents, we'll write out these dirty pages, which marks the extent written, and goes into btrfs_reloc_cow_block(). From here we get our current reloc_control, which _should_ match the reloc_control for the current block group we're relocating. However if we get an ENOSPC in this path at some point we'll bail out, never initiating writeback on this inode. Not a huge deal, unless we happen to be doing relocation on a different block group, and this block group is now rc->stage == UPDATE_DATA_PTRS. This trips the BUG_ON() in btrfs_reloc_cow_block(), because we expect to be done modifying the data inode. We are in fact done modifying the metadata for the data inode we're currently using, but not the one from the failed block group, and thus we BUG_ON(). (This happens when writeback finishes for extents from the previous group, when we are at btrfs_finish_ordered_io() which updates the data reloc tree (inode item, drops/adds extent items, etc).) Fix this by writing out the reloc data inode always, and then breaking out of the loop after that point to keep from tripping this BUG_ON() later. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [ add note from Filipe ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit a9fd0953fa4a62887306be28641b4b0809f3b2fd ] Leaving dev_init_lock mutex locked in probe causes BUG and a WARNING when kernel is compiled with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. Convert mutex to completion which silences those warnings and improves code readability. Fix below errors when connecting the USB WiFi dongle: brcmfmac: brcmf_fw_alloc_request: using brcm/brcmfmac43143 for chip BCM43143/2 BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic: kworker/0:2/0x00000000/434 last function: hub_event 1 lock held by kworker/0:2/434: #0: 18d5dcdf (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}, at: brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x550 [brcmfmac] CPU: 0 PID: 434 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 4.19.23-00084-g454a789-dirty CruelKernel#123 Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree) Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event [<8011237c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<8010d74c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<8010d74c>] (show_stack) from [<809c4324>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4) [<809c4324>] (dump_stack) from [<8014195c>] (process_one_work+0x710/0x808) [<8014195c>] (process_one_work) from [<80141a80>] (worker_thread+0x2c/0x564) [<80141a80>] (worker_thread) from [<80147bcc>] (kthread+0x13c/0x16c) [<80147bcc>] (kthread) from [<801010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) Exception stack(0xed1d9fb0 to 0xed1d9ff8) 9fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 9fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.19.23-00084-g454a789-dirty CruelKernel#123 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:2/434 is trying to acquire lock: e29cf799 ((wq_completion)"events"){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x174/0x808 but task is already holding lock: 18d5dcdf (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}, at: brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x550 [brcmfmac] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> CruelKernel#2 (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}: mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x550 [brcmfmac] usb_probe_interface+0xc0/0x1bc really_probe+0x228/0x2c0 __driver_attach+0xe4/0xe8 bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0xb4 bus_add_driver+0x19c/0x214 driver_register+0x78/0x110 usb_register_driver+0x84/0x148 process_one_work+0x228/0x808 worker_thread+0x2c/0x564 kthread+0x13c/0x16c ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20 (null) -> #1 (brcmf_driver_work){+.+.}: worker_thread+0x2c/0x564 kthread+0x13c/0x16c ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20 (null) -> #0 ((wq_completion)"events"){+.+.}: process_one_work+0x1b8/0x808 worker_thread+0x2c/0x564 kthread+0x13c/0x16c ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20 (null) other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)"events" --> brcmf_driver_work --> &devinfo->dev_init_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&devinfo->dev_init_lock); lock(brcmf_driver_work); lock(&devinfo->dev_init_lock); lock((wq_completion)"events"); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by kworker/0:2/434: #0: 18d5dcdf (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}, at: brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x550 [brcmfmac] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 434 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 4.19.23-00084-g454a789-dirty CruelKernel#123 Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree) Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func [<8011237c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<8010d74c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<8010d74c>] (show_stack) from [<809c4324>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4) [<809c4324>] (dump_stack) from [<80172838>] (print_circular_bug+0x210/0x330) [<80172838>] (print_circular_bug) from [<80175940>] (__lock_acquire+0x160c/0x1a30) [<80175940>] (__lock_acquire) from [<8017671c>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0x268) [<8017671c>] (lock_acquire) from [<80141404>] (process_one_work+0x1b8/0x808) [<80141404>] (process_one_work) from [<80141a80>] (worker_thread+0x2c/0x564) [<80141a80>] (worker_thread) from [<80147bcc>] (kthread+0x13c/0x16c) [<80147bcc>] (kthread) from [<801010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) Exception stack(0xed1d9fb0 to 0xed1d9ff8) 9fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 9fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 Signed-off-by: Piotr Figiel <p.figiel@camlintechnologies.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

…text commit 0c9e8b3cad654bfc499c10b652fbf8f0b890af8f upstream. stub_probe() and stub_disconnect() call functions which could call sleeping function in invalid context whil holding busid_lock. Fix the problem by refining the lock holds to short critical sections to change the busid_priv fields. This fix restructures the code to limit the lock holds in stub_probe() and stub_disconnect(). stub_probe(): [15217.927028] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.h:418 [15217.927038] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 29087, name: usbip [15217.927044] 5 locks held by usbip/29087: [15217.927047] #0: 0000000091647f28 (sb_writers#6){....}, at: vfs_write+0x191/0x1c0 [15217.927062] #1: 000000008f9ba75b (&of->mutex){....}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xf7/0x1b0 [15217.927072] CruelKernel#2: 00000000872e5b4b (&dev->mutex){....}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x3b/0x50 [15217.927082] CruelKernel#3: 00000000e74ececc (&dev->mutex){....}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x46/0x50 [15217.927090] CruelKernel#4: 00000000b20abbe0 (&(&busid_table[i].busid_lock)->rlock){....}, at: get_busid_priv+0x48/0x60 [usbip_host] [15217.927103] CPU: 3 PID: 29087 Comm: usbip Tainted: G W 5.1.0-rc6+ CruelKernel#40 [15217.927106] Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 790/0HY9JP, BIOS A18 09/24/2013 [15217.927109] Call Trace: [15217.927118] dump_stack+0x63/0x85 [15217.927127] ___might_sleep+0xff/0x120 [15217.927133] __might_sleep+0x4a/0x80 [15217.927143] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1aa/0x210 [15217.927156] stub_probe+0xe8/0x440 [usbip_host] [15217.927171] usb_probe_device+0x34/0x70 stub_disconnect(): [15279.182478] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:908 [15279.182487] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 29114, name: usbip [15279.182492] 5 locks held by usbip/29114: [15279.182494] #0: 0000000091647f28 (sb_writers#6){....}, at: vfs_write+0x191/0x1c0 [15279.182506] #1: 00000000702cf0f3 (&of->mutex){....}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xf7/0x1b0 [15279.182514] CruelKernel#2: 00000000872e5b4b (&dev->mutex){....}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x3b/0x50 [15279.182522] CruelKernel#3: 00000000e74ececc (&dev->mutex){....}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x46/0x50 [15279.182529] CruelKernel#4: 00000000b20abbe0 (&(&busid_table[i].busid_lock)->rlock){....}, at: get_busid_priv+0x48/0x60 [usbip_host] [15279.182541] CPU: 0 PID: 29114 Comm: usbip Tainted: G W 5.1.0-rc6+ CruelKernel#40 [15279.182543] Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 790/0HY9JP, BIOS A18 09/24/2013 [15279.182546] Call Trace: [15279.182554] dump_stack+0x63/0x85 [15279.182561] ___might_sleep+0xff/0x120 [15279.182566] __might_sleep+0x4a/0x80 [15279.182574] __mutex_lock+0x55/0x950 [15279.182582] ? get_busid_priv+0x48/0x60 [usbip_host] [15279.182587] ? reacquire_held_locks+0xec/0x1a0 [15279.182591] ? get_busid_priv+0x48/0x60 [usbip_host] [15279.182597] ? find_held_lock+0x94/0xa0 [15279.182609] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 [15279.182614] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 [15279.182618] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x2a/0x90 [15279.182625] sysfs_remove_file_ns+0x15/0x20 [15279.182629] device_remove_file+0x19/0x20 [15279.182634] stub_disconnect+0x6d/0x180 [usbip_host] [15279.182643] usb_unbind_device+0x27/0x60 Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

… sdevs) commit ef4021fe5fd77ced0323cede27979d80a56211ca upstream. When the user tries to remove a zfcp port via sysfs, we only rejected it if there are zfcp unit children under the port. With purely automatically scanned LUNs there are no zfcp units but only SCSI devices. In such cases, the port_remove erroneously continued. We close the port and this implicitly closes all LUNs under the port. The SCSI devices survive with their private zfcp_scsi_dev still holding a reference to the "removed" zfcp_port (still allocated but invisible in sysfs) [zfcp_get_port_by_wwpn in zfcp_scsi_slave_alloc]. This is not a problem as long as the fc_rport stays blocked. Once (auto) port scan brings back the removed port, we unblock its fc_rport again by design. However, there is no mechanism that would recover (open) the LUNs under the port (no "ersfs_3" without zfcp_unit [zfcp_erp_strategy_followup_success]). Any pending or new I/O to such LUN leads to repeated: Done: NEEDS_RETRY Result: hostbyte=DID_IMM_RETRY driverbyte=DRIVER_OK See also v4.10 commit 6f2ce1c ("scsi: zfcp: fix rport unblock race with LUN recovery"). Even a manual LUN recovery (echo 0 > /sys/bus/scsi/devices/H:C:T:L/zfcp_failed) does not help, as the LUN links to the old "removed" port which remains to lack ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_RUNNING [zfcp_erp_required_act]. The only workaround is to first ensure that the fc_rport is blocked (e.g. port_remove again in case it was re-discovered by (auto) port scan), then delete the SCSI devices, and finally re-discover by (auto) port scan. The port scan includes an fc_rport unblock, which in turn triggers a new scan on the scsi target to freshly get new pure auto scan LUNs. Fix this by rejecting port_remove also if there are SCSI devices (even without any zfcp_unit) under this port. Re-use mechanics from v3.7 commit d99b601 ("[SCSI] zfcp: restore refcount check on port_remove"). However, we have to give up zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex earlier in unit_add to prevent a deadlock with scsi_host scan taking shost->scan_mutex first and then zfcp_sysfs_port_units_mutex now in our zfcp_scsi_slave_alloc(). Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com> Fixes: b62a8d9 ("[SCSI] zfcp: Use SCSI device data zfcp scsi dev instead of zfcp unit") Fixes: f8210e3 ("[SCSI] zfcp: Allow midlayer to scan for LUNs when running in NPIV mode") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> CruelKernel#2.6.37+ Reviewed-by: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit 198790d9a3aeaef5792d33a560020861126edc22 ] In free_percpu() we sometimes call pcpu_schedule_balance_work() to queue a work item (which does a wakeup) while holding pcpu_lock. This creates an unnecessary lock dependency between pcpu_lock and the scheduler's pi_lock. There are other places where we call pcpu_schedule_balance_work() without hold pcpu_lock, and this case doesn't need to be different. Moving the call outside the lock prevents the following lockdep splat when running tools/testing/selftests/bpf/{test_maps,test_progs} in sequence with lockdep enabled: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.1.0-dbg-DEV #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/23:255/18872 is trying to acquire lock: 000000000bc79290 (&(&pool->lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: __queue_work+0xb2/0x520 but task is already holding lock: 00000000e3e7a6aa (pcpu_lock){..-.}, at: free_percpu+0x36/0x260 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> CruelKernel#4 (pcpu_lock){..-.}: lock_acquire+0x9e/0x180 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x50 pcpu_alloc+0xfa/0x780 __alloc_percpu_gfp+0x12/0x20 alloc_htab_elem+0x184/0x2b0 __htab_percpu_map_update_elem+0x252/0x290 bpf_percpu_hash_update+0x7c/0x130 __do_sys_bpf+0x1912/0x1be0 __x64_sys_bpf+0x1a/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x59/0x400 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> CruelKernel#3 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){....}: lock_acquire+0x9e/0x180 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x50 htab_map_update_elem+0x1af/0x3a0 -> CruelKernel#2 (&rq->lock){-.-.}: lock_acquire+0x9e/0x180 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 task_fork_fair+0x37/0x160 sched_fork+0x211/0x310 copy_process.part.43+0x7b1/0x2160 _do_fork+0xda/0x6b0 kernel_thread+0x29/0x30 rest_init+0x22/0x260 arch_call_rest_init+0xe/0x10 start_kernel+0x4fd/0x520 x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x26 x86_64_start_kernel+0x6f/0x72 secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 -> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}: lock_acquire+0x9e/0x180 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x50 try_to_wake_up+0x41/0x600 wake_up_process+0x15/0x20 create_worker+0x16b/0x1e0 workqueue_init+0x279/0x2ee kernel_init_freeable+0xf7/0x288 kernel_init+0xf/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 -> #0 (&(&pool->lock)->rlock){-.-.}: __lock_acquire+0x101f/0x12a0 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x180 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 __queue_work+0xb2/0x520 queue_work_on+0x38/0x80 free_percpu+0x221/0x260 pcpu_freelist_destroy+0x11/0x20 stack_map_free+0x2a/0x40 bpf_map_free_deferred+0x3c/0x50 process_one_work+0x1f7/0x580 worker_thread+0x54/0x410 kthread+0x10f/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &(&pool->lock)->rlock --> &htab->buckets[i].lock --> pcpu_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(pcpu_lock); lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock); lock(pcpu_lock); lock(&(&pool->lock)->rlock); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kworker/23:255/18872: #0: 00000000b36a6e16 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x17a/0x580 #1: 00000000dfd966f0 ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x17a/0x580 CruelKernel#2: 00000000e3e7a6aa (pcpu_lock){..-.}, at: free_percpu+0x36/0x260 stack backtrace: CPU: 23 PID: 18872 Comm: kworker/23:255 Not tainted 5.1.0-dbg-DEV #1 Hardware name: ... Workqueue: events bpf_map_free_deferred Call Trace: dump_stack+0x67/0x95 print_circular_bug.isra.38+0x1c6/0x220 check_prev_add.constprop.50+0x9f6/0xd20 __lock_acquire+0x101f/0x12a0 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x180 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 __queue_work+0xb2/0x520 queue_work_on+0x38/0x80 free_percpu+0x221/0x260 pcpu_freelist_destroy+0x11/0x20 stack_map_free+0x2a/0x40 bpf_map_free_deferred+0x3c/0x50 process_one_work+0x1f7/0x580 worker_thread+0x54/0x410 kthread+0x10f/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@google.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 41be3e2618174fdf3361e49e64f2bf530f40c6b0 ] vfio_dev_present() which is the condition to wait_event_interruptible_timeout(), will call vfio_group_get_device and try to acquire the mutex group->device_lock. wait_event_interruptible_timeout() will set the state of the current task to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, before doing the condition check. This means that we will try to acquire the mutex while already in a sleeping state. The scheduler warns us by giving the following warning: [ 4050.264464] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 4050.264508] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at [<00000000b33c00e2>] prepare_to_wait_event+0x14a/0x188 [ 4050.264529] WARNING: CPU: 12 PID: 35924 at kernel/sched/core.c:6112 __might_sleep+0x76/0x90 .... 4050.264756] Call Trace: [ 4050.264765] ([<000000000017bbaa>] __might_sleep+0x72/0x90) [ 4050.264774] [<0000000000b97edc>] __mutex_lock+0x44/0x8c0 [ 4050.264782] [<0000000000b9878a>] mutex_lock_nested+0x32/0x40 [ 4050.264793] [<000003ff800d7abe>] vfio_group_get_device+0x36/0xa8 [vfio] [ 4050.264803] [<000003ff800d87c0>] vfio_del_group_dev+0x238/0x378 [vfio] [ 4050.264813] [<000003ff8015f67c>] mdev_remove+0x3c/0x68 [mdev] [ 4050.264825] [<00000000008e01b0>] device_release_driver_internal+0x168/0x268 [ 4050.264834] [<00000000008de692>] bus_remove_device+0x162/0x190 [ 4050.264843] [<00000000008daf42>] device_del+0x1e2/0x368 [ 4050.264851] [<00000000008db12c>] device_unregister+0x64/0x88 [ 4050.264862] [<000003ff8015ed84>] mdev_device_remove+0xec/0x130 [mdev] [ 4050.264872] [<000003ff8015f074>] remove_store+0x6c/0xa8 [mdev] [ 4050.264881] [<000000000046f494>] kernfs_fop_write+0x14c/0x1f8 [ 4050.264890] [<00000000003c1530>] __vfs_write+0x38/0x1a8 [ 4050.264899] [<00000000003c187c>] vfs_write+0xb4/0x198 [ 4050.264908] [<00000000003c1af2>] ksys_write+0x5a/0xb0 [ 4050.264916] [<0000000000b9e270>] system_call+0xdc/0x2d8 [ 4050.264925] 4 locks held by sh/35924: [ 4050.264933] #0: 000000001ef90325 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x9e/0x198 [ 4050.264948] #1: 000000005c1ab0b3 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0x1cc/0x1f8 [ 4050.264963] CruelKernel#2: 0000000034831ab8 (kn->count#297){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_self+0x12e/0x150 [ 4050.264979] CruelKernel#3: 00000000e152484f (&dev->mutex){....}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x5c/0x268 [ 4050.264993] Last Breaking-Event-Address: [ 4050.265002] [<000000000017bbaa>] __might_sleep+0x72/0x90 [ 4050.265010] irq event stamp: 7039 [ 4050.265020] hardirqs last enabled at (7047): [<00000000001cee7a>] console_unlock+0x6d2/0x740 [ 4050.265029] hardirqs last disabled at (7054): [<00000000001ce87e>] console_unlock+0xd6/0x740 [ 4050.265040] softirqs last enabled at (6416): [<0000000000b8fe26>] __udelay+0xb6/0x100 [ 4050.265049] softirqs last disabled at (6415): [<0000000000b8fe06>] __udelay+0x96/0x100 [ 4050.265057] ---[ end trace d04a07d39d99a9f9 ]--- Let's fix this as described in the article https://lwn.net/Articles/628628/. Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com> [remove now redundant vfio_dev_present()] Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 347ab9480313737c0f1aaa08e8f2e1a791235535 ] This patch fixes deadlock warning if removing PWM device when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled. This issue can be reproceduced by the following steps on the R-Car H3 Salvator-X board if the backlight is disabled: # cd /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0 # echo 0 > export # ls device export npwm power pwm0 subsystem uevent unexport # cd device/driver # ls bind e6e31000.pwm uevent unbind # echo e6e31000.pwm > unbind [ 87.659974] ====================================================== [ 87.666149] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 87.672327] 5.0.0 CruelKernel#7 Not tainted [ 87.675549] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 87.681723] bash/2986 is trying to acquire lock: [ 87.686337] 000000005ea0e178 (kn->count#58){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0 [ 87.694528] [ 87.694528] but task is already holding lock: [ 87.700353] 000000006313b17c (pwm_lock){+.+.}, at: pwmchip_remove+0x28/0x13c [ 87.707405] [ 87.707405] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 87.707405] [ 87.715574] [ 87.715574] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 87.723048] [ 87.723048] -> #1 (pwm_lock){+.+.}: [ 87.728017] __mutex_lock+0x70/0x7e4 [ 87.732108] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 [ 87.736547] pwm_request_from_chip.part.6+0x34/0x74 [ 87.741940] pwm_request_from_chip+0x20/0x40 [ 87.746725] export_store+0x6c/0x1f4 [ 87.750820] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x28 [ 87.754998] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64 [ 87.759175] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8 [ 87.763615] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184 [ 87.767619] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c [ 87.771448] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc [ 87.775278] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 87.779721] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124 [ 87.783986] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24 [ 87.788858] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18 [ 87.792947] [ 87.792947] -> #0 (kn->count#58){++++}: [ 87.798260] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x22c [ 87.802353] __kernfs_remove+0x258/0x2c4 [ 87.806790] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0 [ 87.811836] remove_files.isra.1+0x38/0x78 [ 87.816447] sysfs_remove_group+0x48/0x98 [ 87.820971] sysfs_remove_groups+0x34/0x4c [ 87.825583] device_remove_attrs+0x6c/0x7c [ 87.830197] device_del+0x11c/0x33c [ 87.834201] device_unregister+0x14/0x2c [ 87.838638] pwmchip_sysfs_unexport+0x40/0x4c [ 87.843509] pwmchip_remove+0xf4/0x13c [ 87.847773] rcar_pwm_remove+0x28/0x34 [ 87.852039] platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x64 [ 87.856651] device_release_driver_internal+0x18c/0x21c [ 87.862391] device_release_driver+0x14/0x1c [ 87.867175] unbind_store+0xe0/0x124 [ 87.871265] drv_attr_store+0x20/0x30 [ 87.875442] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64 [ 87.879618] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8 [ 87.884055] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184 [ 87.888057] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c [ 87.891887] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc [ 87.895716] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 87.900154] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124 [ 87.904417] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24 [ 87.909289] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18 [ 87.913378] [ 87.913378] other info that might help us debug this: [ 87.913378] [ 87.921374] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 87.921374] [ 87.927286] CPU0 CPU1 [ 87.931808] ---- ---- [ 87.936331] lock(pwm_lock); [ 87.939293] lock(kn->count#58); [ 87.945120] lock(pwm_lock); [ 87.950599] lock(kn->count#58); [ 87.953908] [ 87.953908] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 87.953908] [ 87.959821] 4 locks held by bash/2986: [ 87.963563] #0: 00000000ace7bc30 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x188/0x19c [ 87.971044] #1: 00000000287991b2 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xb4/0x1e8 [ 87.978872] CruelKernel#2: 00000000f739d016 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x40/0x21c [ 87.988001] CruelKernel#3: 000000006313b17c (pwm_lock){+.+.}, at: pwmchip_remove+0x28/0x13c [ 87.995481] [ 87.995481] stack backtrace: [ 87.999836] CPU: 0 PID: 2986 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.0.0 CruelKernel#7 [ 88.005489] Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X board based on r8a7795 ES1.x (DT) [ 88.012791] Call trace: [ 88.015235] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x190 [ 88.018891] show_stack+0x14/0x1c [ 88.022204] dump_stack+0xb0/0xec [ 88.025514] print_circular_bug.isra.32+0x1d0/0x2e0 [ 88.030385] __lock_acquire+0x1318/0x1864 [ 88.034388] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x22c [ 88.037958] __kernfs_remove+0x258/0x2c4 [ 88.041874] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0 [ 88.046398] remove_files.isra.1+0x38/0x78 [ 88.050487] sysfs_remove_group+0x48/0x98 [ 88.054490] sysfs_remove_groups+0x34/0x4c [ 88.058580] device_remove_attrs+0x6c/0x7c [ 88.062671] device_del+0x11c/0x33c [ 88.066154] device_unregister+0x14/0x2c [ 88.070070] pwmchip_sysfs_unexport+0x40/0x4c [ 88.074421] pwmchip_remove+0xf4/0x13c [ 88.078163] rcar_pwm_remove+0x28/0x34 [ 88.081906] platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x64 [ 88.085996] device_release_driver_internal+0x18c/0x21c [ 88.091215] device_release_driver+0x14/0x1c [ 88.095478] unbind_store+0xe0/0x124 [ 88.099048] drv_attr_store+0x20/0x30 [ 88.102704] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64 [ 88.106359] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8 [ 88.110275] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184 [ 88.113757] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c [ 88.117065] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc [ 88.120374] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20 [ 88.124291] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124 [ 88.128034] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24 [ 88.132384] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18 The sysfs unexport in pwmchip_remove() is completely asymmetric to what we do in pwmchip_add_with_polarity() and commit 0733424 ("pwm: Unexport children before chip removal") is a strong indication that this was wrong to begin with. We should just move pwmchip_sysfs_unexport() where it belongs, which is right after pwmchip_sysfs_unexport_children(). In that case, we do not need separate functions anymore either. We also really want to remove sysfs irrespective of whether or not the chip will be removed as a result of pwmchip_remove(). We can only assume that the driver will be gone after that, so we shouldn't leave any dangling sysfs files around. This warning disappears if we move pwmchip_sysfs_unexport() to the top of pwmchip_remove(), pwmchip_sysfs_unexport_children(). That way it is also outside of the pwm_lock section, which indeed doesn't seem to be needed. Moving the pwmchip_sysfs_export() call outside of that section also seems fine and it'd be perfectly symmetric with pwmchip_remove() again. So, this patch fixes them. Signed-off-by: Phong Hoang <phong.hoang.wz@renesas.com> [shimoda: revise the commit log and code] Fixes: 76abbdd ("pwm: Add sysfs interface") Fixes: 0733424 ("pwm: Unexport children before chip removal") Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> Tested-by: Hoan Nguyen An <na-hoan@jinso.co.jp> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit 9002b21465fa4d829edfc94a5a441005cffaa972 upstream. Commit 32a5ad9c2285 ("sysctl: handle overflow for file-max") hooked up min/max values for the file-max sysctl parameter via the .extra1 and .extra2 fields in the corresponding struct ctl_table entry. Unfortunately, the minimum value points at the global 'zero' variable, which is an int. This results in a KASAN splat when accessed as a long by proc_doulongvec_minmax on 64-bit architectures: | BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x5d8/0x6a0 | Read of size 8 at addr ffff2000133d1c20 by task systemd/1 | | CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 5.1.0-rc3-00012-g40b114779944 #2 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | Call trace: | dump_backtrace+0x0/0x228 | show_stack+0x14/0x20 | dump_stack+0xe8/0x124 | print_address_description+0x60/0x258 | kasan_report+0x140/0x1a0 | __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x18/0x20 | __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x5d8/0x6a0 | proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x4c/0x78 | proc_sys_call_handler.isra.19+0x144/0x1d8 | proc_sys_write+0x34/0x58 | __vfs_write+0x54/0xe8 | vfs_write+0x124/0x3c0 | ksys_write+0xbc/0x168 | __arm64_sys_write+0x68/0x98 | el0_svc_common+0x100/0x258 | el0_svc_handler+0x48/0xc0 | el0_svc+0x8/0xc | | The buggy address belongs to the variable: | zero+0x0/0x40 | | Memory state around the buggy address: | ffff2000133d1b00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa | ffff2000133d1b80: fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa | >ffff2000133d1c00: fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 | ^ | ffff2000133d1c80: fa fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 | ffff2000133d1d00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Fix the splat by introducing a unsigned long 'zero_ul' and using that instead. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190403153409.17307-1-will.deacon@arm.com Fixes: 32a5ad9c2285 ("sysctl: handle overflow for file-max") Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Matteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Update main.yml

afb4318

I want to update to G977B version

evdenis closed this Mar 11, 2020

xuanhoa8687 deleted the patch-3 branch September 5, 2020 13:54

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Update main.yml #2

Update main.yml #2

xuanhoa8687 commented Mar 10, 2020

evdenis commented Mar 11, 2020

Update main.yml #2

Update main.yml #2

Conversation

xuanhoa8687 commented Mar 10, 2020

evdenis commented Mar 11, 2020