What can be used instead of dfs.find_nearest_profile_elements(long, lat) #596
-
Hello, DFSU's I used to get the element ids for the long/lat combination like this What would be the best option to achieve the same result with the current version (1.6.2) Thanks |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
ecomodeller
Sep 7, 2023
Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
Answer selected by
ecomodeller
-
Let me think about it. However, from the top of my mind, I often work with
field data and I need to drop a lat/long when I have the instruments and
get the time series for that location out of the model file.
dfs.read(x, y) kind of does that, but dealing with the vertical profiles is
cumbersome. It can be done, but having an explicit API that will allow
getting that data directly for a location and depth would simplify and
speed up the code
How about read(x, y, z) ?
I'll think about other uses after our Thanksgiving long weekend ;-)
Thanks
Bogdan
…On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 12:04 PM Henrik Andersson ***@***.***> wrote:
We are consider to extend the subsetting options for 3d files, @bhlevca
<https://github.com/bhlevca> do you have any suggestions on useful
features that would ease the work with Dfsu 3d data?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#596 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABMRXQNAUW776G42EA5LB3X6LFJRAVCNFSM6AAAAAA4PLPOCCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM3TEMRTGYYTO>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
How about
dfs.read(x, y)
?