-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Normalized Taylor plot #79
Conversation
@dhithu What do you think? Was it something like this? |
@jsmariegaard Very nice, looking forward to trying this in a project! I have tested a bit and it seems to work nicely. I have two comments, the first is that I don't think the combination normalize=false and aggregate=false should be allowed, since it doesn't make sense. It is presently allowed, but the result doesn't look correct. The second comment is just a cosmetic one, it would look a bit clearer when normalize=true, if the std-axis tickmarks/grid included the value 1. Not sure if that's possible. See example here: https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/389578/fmars-05-00287-HTML/image_m/fmars-05-00287-g005.jpg |
@dhithu I have changed the name of the arguments to normalize_std and aggregate_observations to be more explicit |
Sometimes it's more convenient to do a Taylor plot with a normalized std axis as it allows for comparing multiple stations in the same plot.
As a response to @dhithu's suggestion #77 ...