-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed race condition between StartETW() and StopETW() #22664
Fixed race condition between StartETW() and StopETW() #22664
Conversation
The fix is based on the few following facts * StartETW() will be block on call to C.StartEtwSubscription() * StartETW() will be unblocked by call StopETW() and specifically C.StopEtwSubscription() * etwCallbackC() will not be invoked after ETW session is stopped (C.StopEtwSubscription() is completed and C.StartEtwSubscription() is unllocked)
Bloop Bleep... Dogbot HereRegression Detector ResultsRun ID: a450e818-b10e-450a-96ad-782d00d600bd Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
No significant changes in experiment optimization goalsConfidence level: 90.00% There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.28 | [+0.18, +0.38] |
➖ | idle | memory utilization | -0.09 | [-0.14, -0.04] |
➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -0.18 | [-6.71, +6.34] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | process_agent_standard_check_with_stats | memory utilization | +0.48 | [+0.43, +0.54] |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.28 | [+0.18, +0.38] |
➖ | process_agent_real_time_mode | memory utilization | +0.05 | [+0.01, +0.10] |
➖ | trace_agent_json | ingress throughput | +0.03 | [+0.01, +0.06] |
➖ | trace_agent_msgpack | ingress throughput | +0.02 | [+0.00, +0.03] |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.03, +0.03] |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.06, +0.06] |
➖ | idle | memory utilization | -0.09 | [-0.14, -0.04] |
➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -0.18 | [-6.71, +6.34] |
➖ | process_agent_standard_check | memory utilization | -0.19 | [-0.25, -0.13] |
➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | -0.41 | [-1.12, +0.31] |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.65 | [-0.71, -0.60] |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -1.00 | [-2.39, +0.39] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
/merge |
🚂 MergeQueue This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals. Use |
🚂 MergeQueue Added to the queue. This build is going to start soon! (estimated merge in less than 47m) Use |
@@ -120,12 +160,12 @@ func StartEtw(subscriptionName string, etwProviders ProviderType, sub Subscriber | |||
// | |||
// See above note about http-centrism | |||
func StopEtw(subscriptionName string) { | |||
subs := getSubscribers() | |||
|
|||
if len(subscribers) != 0 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❓ question
Should this be len(subs)
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes!!! Thank you, creating another PR
Fixed race condition between StartETW() and StopETW()
The fix is based on the few following facts
What does this PR do?
Fixes race condition in the ETW package by adding mutex for access a global map.
Motivation
Fix the bug
Additional Notes
n/a
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
n/a
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Make sure that all unit and kitchen tests are passing.
Reviewer's Checklist
Triage
milestone is set.major_change
label if your change either has a major impact on the code base, is impacting multiple teams or is changing important well-established internals of the Agent. This label will be use during QA to make sure each team pay extra attention to the changed behavior. For any customer facing change use a releasenote.changelog/no-changelog
label has been applied.qa/skip-qa
label, with required eitherqa/done
orqa/no-code-change
labels, are applied.team/..
label has been applied, indicating the team(s) that should QA this change.need-change/operator
andneed-change/helm
labels have been applied.k8s/<min-version>
label, indicating the lowest Kubernetes version compatible with this feature.