Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Keep only the root and core project #1021

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024
Merged

Keep only the root and core project #1021

merged 13 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

visr
Copy link
Member

@visr visr commented Jan 31, 2024

This attempts to simplifiy our Julia project and build setup.

Where possible, existing projects are moved into the root project like in #1014. All core dependencies are now also direct root dependencies to make using the root project more convenient for development.

While working on this I realized that we can remove the libribasim and ribasim_cli projects entirely. libribasim is now a module of the Ribasim package, and ribasim_cli already was just a tiny wrapper around Ribasim.main. The content of the README.md files from those two folders now reside in the build_lib and build_app docstring.

Since that left only the create_binaries folder under /build, I collapsed that level out. create_binaries is no longer a package, but the code is still used, but now simply directly included in build.jl.

@visr visr mentioned this pull request Feb 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Hofer-Julian Hofer-Julian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the tests work, it can be merged from my side.
Nice yak shave

Copy link
Contributor

@deltamarnix deltamarnix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have some questions about the root Project.toml

MarkdownTables = "1862ce21-31c7-451e-824c-f20fa3f90fa2"
MetaGraphsNext = "fa8bd995-216d-47f1-8a91-f3b68fbeb377"
OrderedCollections = "bac558e1-5e72-5ebc-8fee-abe8a469f55d"
OrdinaryDiffEq = "1dea7af3-3e70-54e6-95c3-0bf5283fa5ed"
PackageCompiler = "9b87118b-4619-50d2-8e1e-99f35a4d4d9d"
PreallocationTools = "d236fae5-4411-538c-8e31-a6e3d9e00b46"
ReTestItems = "817f1d60-ba6b-4fd5-9520-3cf149f6a823"
Revise = "295af30f-e4ad-537b-8983-00126c2a3abe"
Ribasim = "aac5e3d9-0b8f-4d4f-8241-b1a7a9632635"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see that Ribasim itself is still in this list. Does that make sense?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. The root project is the superset of the core + all other dev/build/other deps we need. Including Ribasim here means we can use Ribasim from the root environment.

MarkdownTables = "1862ce21-31c7-451e-824c-f20fa3f90fa2"
MetaGraphsNext = "fa8bd995-216d-47f1-8a91-f3b68fbeb377"
OrderedCollections = "bac558e1-5e72-5ebc-8fee-abe8a469f55d"
OrdinaryDiffEq = "1dea7af3-3e70-54e6-95c3-0bf5283fa5ed"
PackageCompiler = "9b87118b-4619-50d2-8e1e-99f35a4d4d9d"
PreallocationTools = "d236fae5-4411-538c-8e31-a6e3d9e00b46"
ReTestItems = "817f1d60-ba6b-4fd5-9520-3cf149f6a823"
Revise = "295af30f-e4ad-537b-8983-00126c2a3abe"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The split made it possible to add debug items that would not be needed to package in the binary. How do we know if we don't pack too many dependencies now? Should we remove some developer only packages and set it up in a different way?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The root project is used to build the binaries, but it is only the core project that is being built. So there is no risk to adding more dev dependencies to the root project.

Before this change we did also have libribasim and ribasim_cli projects. So we do lose the ability to add dependencies for our binaries that are not depdendencies of the core. But there are no such dependencies right now.

@visr visr merged commit 4c4bb52 into main Feb 1, 2024
23 checks passed
@visr visr deleted the root-of-all branch February 1, 2024 14:57
Hofer-Julian pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2024
In #1021 I enabled to run CompatHelper on the root project, but seeing
the flood of PRs this morning and thinking about it some more, I think
this was a mistake. We should close all those PRs.

Compat is needed in core for all dependencies. For other dependencies,
in principle we shouldn't declare compat, since we use a Manifest
anyway. This is similar to the way we allow any version in pixi.toml,
and the monthly pixi.lock update also brings in possibly breaking
changes that we can then evaluate.

We could have compat entries in the root project. Those makes sense if
we are not compatible with newer breaking releases to hold it back. This
way the manifest update will not bring in this incompatible release. We
should not forget about these, so ideally we have an issue labeled
`tech-debt` for those.
@visr visr mentioned this pull request Mar 5, 2024
Hofer-Julian pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2024
Taken out of #1204 whilst that is on hold.

The directories changed in #1021, causing our precompile run to return
error code 1 with a "TOML not found error". That means we were not
precompiling an actual run and therefore probably need to wait a bit
longer before the start of a simulation. This fixes the directory and
adds an assertion to make sure the simulation is successful.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants