-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
게시판 CRUD API 구현 #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@DevCHW has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
WalkthroughA new in-memory board post system has been added using a Kotlin Spring Boot REST controller. It introduces a Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant BoardController
participant InMemoryStore
Client->>BoardController: POST /api/board (Post)
BoardController->>InMemoryStore: Store new Post with generated ID
BoardController-->>Client: 201 Created (Post)
Client->>BoardController: GET /api/board
BoardController->>InMemoryStore: Retrieve all Posts
BoardController-->>Client: 200 OK (List<Post>)
Client->>BoardController: GET /api/board/{id}
BoardController->>InMemoryStore: Retrieve Post by ID
alt Post exists
BoardController-->>Client: 200 OK (Post)
else Post missing
BoardController-->>Client: 404 Not Found
end
Client->>BoardController: PUT /api/board/{id} (Post)
BoardController->>InMemoryStore: Check & update Post by ID
alt Post exists
BoardController-->>Client: 200 OK (Updated Post)
else Post missing
BoardController-->>Client: 404 Not Found
end
Client->>BoardController: DELETE /api/board/{id}
BoardController->>InMemoryStore: Remove Post by ID
alt Post exists
BoardController-->>Client: 204 No Content
else Post missing
BoardController-->>Client: 404 Not Found
end
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Docstrings generation was requested by @DevCHW. * #2 (comment) The following files were modified: * `src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt`
Note Generated docstrings for this pull request at #3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/Post.kt (2)
7-11
: LGTM! Consider adding validation annotations.The data class structure is well-designed for the bulletin board use case. The nullable id and mutable properties are appropriate for the controller's needs.
Consider adding validation annotations for better input validation:
+import javax.validation.constraints.NotBlank +import javax.validation.constraints.Size + data class Post( var id: Long? = null, + @field:NotBlank(message = "Title cannot be blank") + @field:Size(max = 100, message = "Title cannot exceed 100 characters") var title: String, + @field:NotBlank(message = "Content cannot be blank") + @field:Size(max = 1000, message = "Content cannot exceed 1000 characters") var content: String )
7-11
: Good data class design for CRUD operations.The data class structure is well-designed with nullable ID for creation scenarios and mutable properties for updates. The automatic generation of
equals()
,hashCode()
, andtoString()
methods from the data class will be beneficial.Consider adding validation annotations for production use:
+import jakarta.validation.constraints.NotBlank +import jakarta.validation.constraints.Size + data class Post( var id: Long? = null, + @field:NotBlank(message = "Title cannot be blank") + @field:Size(max = 100, message = "Title must not exceed 100 characters") var title: String, + @field:NotBlank(message = "Content cannot be blank") + @field:Size(max = 5000, message = "Content must not exceed 5000 characters") var content: String )src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt (2)
27-33
: CRUD create operation implemented correctly.The create endpoint properly generates unique IDs, assigns them to posts, and returns the appropriate HTTP 201 status. The logic handles the ID assignment correctly.
Consider adding input validation for better error handling:
@PostMapping -fun createPost(@RequestBody post: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> { +fun createPost(@RequestBody @Valid post: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {This requires adding
@Valid
import and validation annotations to thePost
class.
19-21
: Consider adding operation logging for better monitoring.While the controller implementation is functionally correct, adding logging would improve debugging and monitoring capabilities in a production environment.
Consider adding logging for key operations:
+import org.slf4j.Logger +import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory + @RestController @RequestMapping("/api/board") class BoardController { + + private val logger: Logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(BoardController::class.java)Then add logging statements in CRUD operations for better observability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt
(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/Post.kt
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt (7)
36-39
: LGTM! Clean implementation of the list endpoint.The implementation correctly returns all posts with appropriate HTTP status.
42-50
: LGTM! Proper error handling for the get endpoint.The implementation correctly handles both found and not found cases with appropriate HTTP status codes.
64-71
: LGTM! Correct implementation of the delete endpoint.The delete logic properly handles existence checks and returns appropriate HTTP status codes (404 for not found, 204 for successful deletion).
36-39
: Simple and correct list retrieval implementation.The endpoint correctly returns all posts as a list with HTTP 200 status. The implementation is straightforward and appropriate for the use case.
42-50
: Proper null-safe implementation for single post retrieval.The endpoint correctly handles both success and not-found cases with appropriate HTTP status codes (200 and 404). The null-safe approach using Kotlin's
if
expression is clean and readable.
53-61
: Update operation handles existence check correctly.The endpoint properly validates post existence before updating and returns appropriate status codes. The ID assignment ensures consistency between the path parameter and the stored post.
64-71
: Delete operation with proper existence validation.The endpoint correctly checks for post existence before deletion and returns appropriate HTTP status codes (204 for success, 404 for not found). The implementation follows REST conventions.
@RestController | ||
@RequestMapping("/api/board") | ||
class BoardController { | ||
|
||
private val posts = mutableMapOf<Long, Post>() | ||
private val idGenerator = AtomicLong(1) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Address thread safety concern with concurrent data structure.
The controller structure follows good REST conventions, but there's a critical thread safety issue.
The mutableMapOf
is not thread-safe, which could cause data corruption in a multi-threaded environment. Consider using a concurrent data structure:
+import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap
+
@RestController
@RequestMapping("/api/board")
class BoardController {
- private val posts = mutableMapOf<Long, Post>()
+ private val posts = ConcurrentHashMap<Long, Post>()
private val idGenerator = AtomicLong(1)
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
@RestController | |
@RequestMapping("/api/board") | |
class BoardController { | |
private val posts = mutableMapOf<Long, Post>() | |
private val idGenerator = AtomicLong(1) | |
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap | |
@RestController | |
@RequestMapping("/api/board") | |
class BoardController { | |
private val posts = ConcurrentHashMap<Long, Post>() | |
private val idGenerator = AtomicLong(1) | |
// ... rest of the endpoints | |
} |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt around lines 19 to
25, the mutableMapOf used for storing posts is not thread-safe and can cause
data corruption under concurrent access. Replace the mutableMapOf with a
thread-safe concurrent map implementation such as ConcurrentHashMap to ensure
safe concurrent modifications. This change will prevent race conditions and
maintain data integrity in a multi-threaded environment.
@PutMapping("/{id}") | ||
fun updatePost(@PathVariable id: Long, @RequestBody updatedPost: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> { | ||
if (!posts.containsKey(id)) { | ||
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND).build() | ||
} | ||
updatedPost.id = id | ||
posts[id] = updatedPost | ||
return ResponseEntity.ok(updatedPost) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input validation to the update endpoint.
The update logic correctly handles existence checks and maintains data consistency.
Add validation similar to the create endpoint:
@PutMapping("/{id}")
-fun updatePost(@PathVariable id: Long, @RequestBody updatedPost: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {
+fun updatePost(@PathVariable id: Long, @RequestBody @Valid updatedPost: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {
if (!posts.containsKey(id)) {
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND).build()
}
+ if (updatedPost.title.isBlank() || updatedPost.content.isBlank()) {
+ return ResponseEntity.badRequest().build()
+ }
updatedPost.id = id
posts[id] = updatedPost
return ResponseEntity.ok(updatedPost)
}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
@PutMapping("/{id}") | |
fun updatePost(@PathVariable id: Long, @RequestBody updatedPost: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> { | |
if (!posts.containsKey(id)) { | |
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND).build() | |
} | |
updatedPost.id = id | |
posts[id] = updatedPost | |
return ResponseEntity.ok(updatedPost) | |
} | |
@PutMapping("/{id}") | |
fun updatePost(@PathVariable id: Long, @RequestBody @Valid updatedPost: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> { | |
if (!posts.containsKey(id)) { | |
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND).build() | |
} | |
if (updatedPost.title.isBlank() || updatedPost.content.isBlank()) { | |
return ResponseEntity.badRequest().build() | |
} | |
updatedPost.id = id | |
posts[id] = updatedPost | |
return ResponseEntity.ok(updatedPost) | |
} |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt around lines 53 to
61, the updatePost method lacks input validation for the updatedPost object. Add
validation checks similar to those in the create endpoint to ensure the
updatedPost data meets required constraints before updating. This may include
checking for null or empty fields and validating field formats. Return
appropriate error responses if validation fails.
@PostMapping | ||
fun createPost(@RequestBody post: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> { | ||
val id = idGenerator.getAndIncrement() | ||
post.id = id | ||
posts[id] = post | ||
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.CREATED).body(post) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input validation to the create endpoint.
The create logic is correct and follows REST conventions properly.
Add validation to ensure data integrity:
@PostMapping
-fun createPost(@RequestBody post: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {
+fun createPost(@RequestBody @Valid post: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {
+ if (post.title.isBlank() || post.content.isBlank()) {
+ return ResponseEntity.badRequest().build()
+ }
val id = idGenerator.getAndIncrement()
post.id = id
posts[id] = post
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.CREATED).body(post)
}
Don't forget to add the import:
+import javax.validation.Valid
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
@PostMapping | |
fun createPost(@RequestBody post: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> { | |
val id = idGenerator.getAndIncrement() | |
post.id = id | |
posts[id] = post | |
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.CREATED).body(post) | |
} | |
import javax.validation.Valid | |
@PostMapping | |
fun createPost(@RequestBody @Valid post: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> { | |
if (post.title.isBlank() || post.content.isBlank()) { | |
return ResponseEntity.badRequest().build() | |
} | |
val id = idGenerator.getAndIncrement() | |
post.id = id | |
posts[id] = post | |
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.CREATED).body(post) | |
} |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt around lines 27 to
33, the createPost function lacks input validation which is necessary to ensure
data integrity. Add validation logic to check the incoming Post object's
required fields before processing, returning an appropriate error response if
validation fails. Also, include the necessary import statements for validation
annotations or utilities used.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@coderabbitai @Valid
를 사용하지 않고 처리하려면 어떤 식으로 할 수 있나요?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@DevCHW @Valid
어노테이션을 사용하지 않고 검증을 처리할 수 있는 여러 방법이 있습니다:
1. 수동 검증 (Manual Validation)
컨트롤러 메서드 내에서 직접 검증 로직을 구현하는 방법입니다:
@PostMapping
fun createPost(@RequestBody post: Post): ResponseEntity<*> {
// 필수 필드 검증
if (post.title.isNullOrBlank()) {
return ResponseEntity.badRequest()
.body(mapOf("error" to "제목은 필수입니다"))
}
if (post.content.isNullOrBlank()) {
return ResponseEntity.badRequest()
.body(mapOf("error" to "내용은 필수입니다"))
}
// 길이 검증
if (post.title.length > 100) {
return ResponseEntity.badRequest()
.body(mapOf("error" to "제목은 100자를 초과할 수 없습니다"))
}
val id = idGenerator.getAndIncrement()
post.id = id
posts[id] = post
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.CREATED).body(post)
}
2. 검증 유틸리티 클래스 생성
별도의 검증 클래스를 만들어 재사용 가능한 검증 로직을 구현하는 방법입니다:
class PostValidator {
companion object {
fun validate(post: Post): List<String> {
val errors = mutableListOf<String>()
if (post.title.isNullOrBlank()) {
errors.add("제목은 필수입니다")
} else if (post.title.length > 100) {
errors.add("제목은 100자를 초과할 수 없습니다")
}
if (post.content.isNullOrBlank()) {
errors.add("내용은 필수입니다")
} else if (post.content.length > 1000) {
errors.add("내용은 1000자를 초과할 수 없습니다")
}
return errors
}
}
}
// 컨트롤러에서 사용
@PostMapping
fun createPost(@RequestBody post: Post): ResponseEntity<*> {
val validationErrors = PostValidator.validate(post)
if (validationErrors.isNotEmpty()) {
return ResponseEntity.badRequest()
.body(mapOf("errors" to validationErrors))
}
val id = idGenerator.getAndIncrement()
post.id = id
posts[id] = post
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.CREATED).body(post)
}
3. 확장 함수를 이용한 검증
Kotlin의 확장 함수를 활용하여 Post 클래스에 검증 메서드를 추가하는 방법입니다:
fun Post.validate(): List<String> {
val errors = mutableListOf<String>()
if (title.isBlank()) errors.add("제목은 필수입니다")
if (content.isBlank()) errors.add("내용은 필수입니다")
if (title.length > 100) errors.add("제목이 너무 깁니다")
return errors
}
// 컨트롤러에서 사용
@PostMapping
fun createPost(@RequestBody post: Post): ResponseEntity<*> {
val validationErrors = post.validate()
if (validationErrors.isNotEmpty()) {
return ResponseEntity.badRequest()
.body(mapOf("errors" to validationErrors))
}
val id = idGenerator.getAndIncrement()
post.id = id
posts[id] = post
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.CREATED).body(post)
}
4. 서비스 레이어에서 검증
비즈니스 로직과 함께 서비스 계층에서 검증을 처리하는 방법입니다:
@Service
class BoardService {
fun createPost(post: Post): Post {
validatePost(post)
// 비즈니스 로직 처리
return post
}
private fun validatePost(post: Post) {
require(post.title.isNotBlank()) { "제목은 필수입니다" }
require(post.content.isNotBlank()) { "내용은 필수입니다" }
require(post.title.length <= 100) { "제목이 너무 깁니다" }
}
}
각 방법의 장단점:
- 수동 검증: 간단하지만 코드 중복 가능성
- 검증 유틸리티: 재사용 가능하고 테스트하기 쉬움
- 확장 함수: Kotlin다운 방식, 객체 지향적
- 서비스 레이어: 비즈니스 로직과 분리, 복잡한 검증에 적합
프로젝트 규모와 요구사항에 따라 적절한 방법을 선택하시면 됩니다!
private val posts = mutableMapOf<Long, Post>() | ||
private val idGenerator = AtomicLong(1) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Address thread safety concerns for concurrent access.
While AtomicLong
provides thread-safe ID generation, mutableMapOf
is not thread-safe for concurrent modifications. This could lead to data corruption or inconsistent state in a multi-threaded environment.
Consider using ConcurrentHashMap
for thread safety:
-private val posts = mutableMapOf<Long, Post>()
+private val posts = ConcurrentHashMap<Long, Post>()
Don't forget to add the import:
+import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt around lines 23 to
24, the mutableMapOf used for posts is not thread-safe, which can cause issues
during concurrent access. Replace mutableMapOf with a thread-safe alternative
like ConcurrentHashMap to ensure safe concurrent modifications. Also, add the
necessary import for ConcurrentHashMap at the top of the file.
…2VvNDJq 📝 Add docstrings to `feature-board`
작업 내용
Map
을 사용해 간단한 데이터 저장소로 활용.주요 기능
POST /api/board
)GET /api/board
)GET /api/board/{id}
)PUT /api/board/{id}
)DELETE /api/board/{id}
)구현 방식
Post``id``title``content
AtomicLong
비고
Map
에 저장되며 서버 종료 시 초기화됩니다.Summary by CodeRabbit