Skip to content

Conversation

DevCHW
Copy link
Owner

@DevCHW DevCHW commented Jun 5, 2025

작업 내용

  • 게시판 CRUD API 구현.
  • Map을 사용해 간단한 데이터 저장소로 활용.

주요 기능

  1. 게시물 생성 (POST /api/board)
  2. 게시물 목록 조회 (GET /api/board)
  3. 게시물 상세 조회 (GET /api/board/{id})
  4. 게시물 수정 (PUT /api/board/{id})
  5. 게시물 삭제 (DELETE /api/board/{id})

구현 방식

  • 데이터 클래스 작성 (필드: , , ). Post``id``title``content
  • 으로 ID 자동 생성 및 관리. AtomicLong
  • HTTP 상태 코드 201, 200, 404, 204 적절히 반환.

비고

  • 현재 데이터는 Map에 저장되며 서버 종료 시 초기화됩니다.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a board post system with RESTful API endpoints for creating, viewing, updating, and deleting posts.
    • Users can now manage posts with unique IDs, including listing all posts or retrieving a specific post by ID.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 5, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@DevCHW has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f63c14 and 07b9e4a.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/Comment.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/CommentController.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/Post.kt (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

A new in-memory board post system has been added using a Kotlin Spring Boot REST controller. It introduces a Post data class and a BoardController that provides RESTful CRUD endpoints for managing posts, including creation, retrieval, updating, and deletion, all managed within a mutable map.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/Post.kt Added new Post data class with id, title, and content properties.
src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt Introduced BoardController REST controller with CRUD endpoints for managing Post entities.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant BoardController
    participant InMemoryStore

    Client->>BoardController: POST /api/board (Post)
    BoardController->>InMemoryStore: Store new Post with generated ID
    BoardController-->>Client: 201 Created (Post)

    Client->>BoardController: GET /api/board
    BoardController->>InMemoryStore: Retrieve all Posts
    BoardController-->>Client: 200 OK (List<Post>)

    Client->>BoardController: GET /api/board/{id}
    BoardController->>InMemoryStore: Retrieve Post by ID
    alt Post exists
        BoardController-->>Client: 200 OK (Post)
    else Post missing
        BoardController-->>Client: 404 Not Found
    end

    Client->>BoardController: PUT /api/board/{id} (Post)
    BoardController->>InMemoryStore: Check & update Post by ID
    alt Post exists
        BoardController-->>Client: 200 OK (Updated Post)
    else Post missing
        BoardController-->>Client: 404 Not Found
    end

    Client->>BoardController: DELETE /api/board/{id}
    BoardController->>InMemoryStore: Remove Post by ID
    alt Post exists
        BoardController-->>Client: 204 No Content
    else Post missing
        BoardController-->>Client: 404 Not Found
    end
Loading

Poem

A board was born with posts anew,
In Kotlin code, the endpoints grew.
CRUD hops handled, swift and neat,
Posts in memory, none obsolete.
With every call, a rabbit cheers—
For code that listens, writes, and hears!
🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Docstrings generation was requested by @DevCHW.

* #2 (comment)

The following files were modified:

* `src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt`
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 5, 2025

Note

Generated docstrings for this pull request at #3

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/Post.kt (2)

7-11: LGTM! Consider adding validation annotations.

The data class structure is well-designed for the bulletin board use case. The nullable id and mutable properties are appropriate for the controller's needs.

Consider adding validation annotations for better input validation:

+import javax.validation.constraints.NotBlank
+import javax.validation.constraints.Size
+
 data class Post(
     var id: Long? = null,
+    @field:NotBlank(message = "Title cannot be blank")
+    @field:Size(max = 100, message = "Title cannot exceed 100 characters")
     var title: String,
+    @field:NotBlank(message = "Content cannot be blank")
+    @field:Size(max = 1000, message = "Content cannot exceed 1000 characters")  
     var content: String
 )

7-11: Good data class design for CRUD operations.

The data class structure is well-designed with nullable ID for creation scenarios and mutable properties for updates. The automatic generation of equals(), hashCode(), and toString() methods from the data class will be beneficial.

Consider adding validation annotations for production use:

+import jakarta.validation.constraints.NotBlank
+import jakarta.validation.constraints.Size
+
 data class Post(
     var id: Long? = null,
+    @field:NotBlank(message = "Title cannot be blank")
+    @field:Size(max = 100, message = "Title must not exceed 100 characters")
     var title: String,
+    @field:NotBlank(message = "Content cannot be blank")
+    @field:Size(max = 5000, message = "Content must not exceed 5000 characters")
     var content: String
 )
src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt (2)

27-33: CRUD create operation implemented correctly.

The create endpoint properly generates unique IDs, assigns them to posts, and returns the appropriate HTTP 201 status. The logic handles the ID assignment correctly.

Consider adding input validation for better error handling:

 @PostMapping
-fun createPost(@RequestBody post: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {
+fun createPost(@RequestBody @Valid post: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {

This requires adding @Valid import and validation annotations to the Post class.


19-21: Consider adding operation logging for better monitoring.

While the controller implementation is functionally correct, adding logging would improve debugging and monitoring capabilities in a production environment.

Consider adding logging for key operations:

+import org.slf4j.Logger
+import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory
+
 @RestController
 @RequestMapping("/api/board")
 class BoardController {
+    
+    private val logger: Logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(BoardController::class.java)

Then add logging statements in CRUD operations for better observability.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f20bfd0 and 7b44554.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/Post.kt (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt (7)

36-39: LGTM! Clean implementation of the list endpoint.

The implementation correctly returns all posts with appropriate HTTP status.


42-50: LGTM! Proper error handling for the get endpoint.

The implementation correctly handles both found and not found cases with appropriate HTTP status codes.


64-71: LGTM! Correct implementation of the delete endpoint.

The delete logic properly handles existence checks and returns appropriate HTTP status codes (404 for not found, 204 for successful deletion).


36-39: Simple and correct list retrieval implementation.

The endpoint correctly returns all posts as a list with HTTP 200 status. The implementation is straightforward and appropriate for the use case.


42-50: Proper null-safe implementation for single post retrieval.

The endpoint correctly handles both success and not-found cases with appropriate HTTP status codes (200 and 404). The null-safe approach using Kotlin's if expression is clean and readable.


53-61: Update operation handles existence check correctly.

The endpoint properly validates post existence before updating and returns appropriate status codes. The ID assignment ensures consistency between the path parameter and the stored post.


64-71: Delete operation with proper existence validation.

The endpoint correctly checks for post existence before deletion and returns appropriate HTTP status codes (204 for success, 404 for not found). The implementation follows REST conventions.

Comment on lines 19 to 25
@RestController
@RequestMapping("/api/board")
class BoardController {

private val posts = mutableMapOf<Long, Post>()
private val idGenerator = AtomicLong(1)

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Address thread safety concern with concurrent data structure.

The controller structure follows good REST conventions, but there's a critical thread safety issue.

The mutableMapOf is not thread-safe, which could cause data corruption in a multi-threaded environment. Consider using a concurrent data structure:

+import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap
+
 @RestController
 @RequestMapping("/api/board")
 class BoardController {
 
-    private val posts = mutableMapOf<Long, Post>()
+    private val posts = ConcurrentHashMap<Long, Post>()
     private val idGenerator = AtomicLong(1)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
@RestController
@RequestMapping("/api/board")
class BoardController {
private val posts = mutableMapOf<Long, Post>()
private val idGenerator = AtomicLong(1)
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap
@RestController
@RequestMapping("/api/board")
class BoardController {
private val posts = ConcurrentHashMap<Long, Post>()
private val idGenerator = AtomicLong(1)
// ... rest of the endpoints
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt around lines 19 to
25, the mutableMapOf used for storing posts is not thread-safe and can cause
data corruption under concurrent access. Replace the mutableMapOf with a
thread-safe concurrent map implementation such as ConcurrentHashMap to ensure
safe concurrent modifications. This change will prevent race conditions and
maintain data integrity in a multi-threaded environment.

Comment on lines +53 to +61
@PutMapping("/{id}")
fun updatePost(@PathVariable id: Long, @RequestBody updatedPost: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {
if (!posts.containsKey(id)) {
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND).build()
}
updatedPost.id = id
posts[id] = updatedPost
return ResponseEntity.ok(updatedPost)
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add input validation to the update endpoint.

The update logic correctly handles existence checks and maintains data consistency.

Add validation similar to the create endpoint:

 @PutMapping("/{id}")
-fun updatePost(@PathVariable id: Long, @RequestBody updatedPost: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {
+fun updatePost(@PathVariable id: Long, @RequestBody @Valid updatedPost: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {
     if (!posts.containsKey(id)) {
         return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND).build()
     }
+    if (updatedPost.title.isBlank() || updatedPost.content.isBlank()) {
+        return ResponseEntity.badRequest().build()
+    }
     updatedPost.id = id
     posts[id] = updatedPost
     return ResponseEntity.ok(updatedPost)
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
@PutMapping("/{id}")
fun updatePost(@PathVariable id: Long, @RequestBody updatedPost: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {
if (!posts.containsKey(id)) {
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND).build()
}
updatedPost.id = id
posts[id] = updatedPost
return ResponseEntity.ok(updatedPost)
}
@PutMapping("/{id}")
fun updatePost(@PathVariable id: Long, @RequestBody @Valid updatedPost: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {
if (!posts.containsKey(id)) {
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND).build()
}
if (updatedPost.title.isBlank() || updatedPost.content.isBlank()) {
return ResponseEntity.badRequest().build()
}
updatedPost.id = id
posts[id] = updatedPost
return ResponseEntity.ok(updatedPost)
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt around lines 53 to
61, the updatePost method lacks input validation for the updatedPost object. Add
validation checks similar to those in the create endpoint to ensure the
updatedPost data meets required constraints before updating. This may include
checking for null or empty fields and validating field formats. Return
appropriate error responses if validation fails.

Comment on lines +27 to +33
@PostMapping
fun createPost(@RequestBody post: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {
val id = idGenerator.getAndIncrement()
post.id = id
posts[id] = post
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.CREATED).body(post)
}
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Jun 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add input validation to the create endpoint.

The create logic is correct and follows REST conventions properly.

Add validation to ensure data integrity:

 @PostMapping
-fun createPost(@RequestBody post: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {
+fun createPost(@RequestBody @Valid post: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {
+    if (post.title.isBlank() || post.content.isBlank()) {
+        return ResponseEntity.badRequest().build()
+    }
     val id = idGenerator.getAndIncrement()
     post.id = id
     posts[id] = post
     return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.CREATED).body(post)
 }

Don't forget to add the import:

+import javax.validation.Valid
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
@PostMapping
fun createPost(@RequestBody post: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {
val id = idGenerator.getAndIncrement()
post.id = id
posts[id] = post
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.CREATED).body(post)
}
import javax.validation.Valid
@PostMapping
fun createPost(@RequestBody @Valid post: Post): ResponseEntity<Post> {
if (post.title.isBlank() || post.content.isBlank()) {
return ResponseEntity.badRequest().build()
}
val id = idGenerator.getAndIncrement()
post.id = id
posts[id] = post
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.CREATED).body(post)
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt around lines 27 to
33, the createPost function lacks input validation which is necessary to ensure
data integrity. Add validation logic to check the incoming Post object's
required fields before processing, returning an appropriate error response if
validation fails. Also, include the necessary import statements for validation
annotations or utilities used.

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@coderabbitai @Valid를 사용하지 않고 처리하려면 어떤 식으로 할 수 있나요?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DevCHW @Valid 어노테이션을 사용하지 않고 검증을 처리할 수 있는 여러 방법이 있습니다:

1. 수동 검증 (Manual Validation)

컨트롤러 메서드 내에서 직접 검증 로직을 구현하는 방법입니다:

@PostMapping
fun createPost(@RequestBody post: Post): ResponseEntity<*> {
    // 필수 필드 검증
    if (post.title.isNullOrBlank()) {
        return ResponseEntity.badRequest()
            .body(mapOf("error" to "제목은 필수입니다"))
    }
    
    if (post.content.isNullOrBlank()) {
        return ResponseEntity.badRequest()
            .body(mapOf("error" to "내용은 필수입니다"))
    }
    
    // 길이 검증
    if (post.title.length > 100) {
        return ResponseEntity.badRequest()
            .body(mapOf("error" to "제목은 100자를 초과할 수 없습니다"))
    }
    
    val id = idGenerator.getAndIncrement()
    post.id = id
    posts[id] = post
    return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.CREATED).body(post)
}

2. 검증 유틸리티 클래스 생성

별도의 검증 클래스를 만들어 재사용 가능한 검증 로직을 구현하는 방법입니다:

class PostValidator {
    companion object {
        fun validate(post: Post): List<String> {
            val errors = mutableListOf<String>()
            
            if (post.title.isNullOrBlank()) {
                errors.add("제목은 필수입니다")
            } else if (post.title.length > 100) {
                errors.add("제목은 100자를 초과할 수 없습니다")
            }
            
            if (post.content.isNullOrBlank()) {
                errors.add("내용은 필수입니다")
            } else if (post.content.length > 1000) {
                errors.add("내용은 1000자를 초과할 수 없습니다")
            }
            
            return errors
        }
    }
}

// 컨트롤러에서 사용
@PostMapping
fun createPost(@RequestBody post: Post): ResponseEntity<*> {
    val validationErrors = PostValidator.validate(post)
    if (validationErrors.isNotEmpty()) {
        return ResponseEntity.badRequest()
            .body(mapOf("errors" to validationErrors))
    }
    
    val id = idGenerator.getAndIncrement()
    post.id = id
    posts[id] = post
    return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.CREATED).body(post)
}

3. 확장 함수를 이용한 검증

Kotlin의 확장 함수를 활용하여 Post 클래스에 검증 메서드를 추가하는 방법입니다:

fun Post.validate(): List<String> {
    val errors = mutableListOf<String>()
    
    if (title.isBlank()) errors.add("제목은 필수입니다")
    if (content.isBlank()) errors.add("내용은 필수입니다")
    if (title.length > 100) errors.add("제목이 너무 깁니다")
    
    return errors
}

// 컨트롤러에서 사용
@PostMapping
fun createPost(@RequestBody post: Post): ResponseEntity<*> {
    val validationErrors = post.validate()
    if (validationErrors.isNotEmpty()) {
        return ResponseEntity.badRequest()
            .body(mapOf("errors" to validationErrors))
    }
    
    val id = idGenerator.getAndIncrement()
    post.id = id
    posts[id] = post
    return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.CREATED).body(post)
}

4. 서비스 레이어에서 검증

비즈니스 로직과 함께 서비스 계층에서 검증을 처리하는 방법입니다:

@Service
class BoardService {
    fun createPost(post: Post): Post {
        validatePost(post)
        // 비즈니스 로직 처리
        return post
    }
    
    private fun validatePost(post: Post) {
        require(post.title.isNotBlank()) { "제목은 필수입니다" }
        require(post.content.isNotBlank()) { "내용은 필수입니다" }
        require(post.title.length <= 100) { "제목이 너무 깁니다" }
    }
}

각 방법의 장단점:

  • 수동 검증: 간단하지만 코드 중복 가능성
  • 검증 유틸리티: 재사용 가능하고 테스트하기 쉬움
  • 확장 함수: Kotlin다운 방식, 객체 지향적
  • 서비스 레이어: 비즈니스 로직과 분리, 복잡한 검증에 적합

프로젝트 규모와 요구사항에 따라 적절한 방법을 선택하시면 됩니다!

Comment on lines +23 to +24
private val posts = mutableMapOf<Long, Post>()
private val idGenerator = AtomicLong(1)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Address thread safety concerns for concurrent access.

While AtomicLong provides thread-safe ID generation, mutableMapOf is not thread-safe for concurrent modifications. This could lead to data corruption or inconsistent state in a multi-threaded environment.

Consider using ConcurrentHashMap for thread safety:

-private val posts = mutableMapOf<Long, Post>()
+private val posts = ConcurrentHashMap<Long, Post>()

Don't forget to add the import:

+import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/kotlin/io/devchw/coderabbit/BoardController.kt around lines 23 to
24, the mutableMapOf used for posts is not thread-safe, which can cause issues
during concurrent access. Replace mutableMapOf with a thread-safe alternative
like ConcurrentHashMap to ensure safe concurrent modifications. Also, add the
necessary import for ConcurrentHashMap at the top of the file.

Repository owner deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Jun 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant