MAINT,ENH: Minimal linprog SciPy changes
#1460
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: rgommers <rgommers@users.noreply.github.com>
HaoZeke
changed the title
linprog SciPy changeslinprog SciPy changes
This was referenced Oct 15, 2023
|
@jajhall and @galabovaa, this should be ready to go :) |
|
Thanks a lot! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is extracted from #1405 and #1447. The goal is to iteratively bring back the modeling API and also ensure SciPy transitions with minimal scope creep.
This is coupled to scipy/scipy#19255
Subsequently, #1447 will be completed and coupled to a PR to SciPy transitioning
highsto be the defaultlinprogsolver, closing scipy/scipy#15707 (callback support is a requirement for this).Finally, #1405 can be completed (and possibly be used in SciPy for the Object Oriented solver scipy/scipy#15915).