Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove routine renames from mpas_ocn_okubo_weiss.F90 #2

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 3, 2023

Conversation

gdicker1
Copy link
Contributor

@gdicker1 gdicker1 commented Apr 28, 2023

This PR removes unneeded renaming of module-specific qsort routines to dummy*. Since those qsort routines aren't used in mpas_ocn_okubo_weiss anymore, they don't need to be renamed.

Also removes a duplicate of mpas_ocn_okubo_weiss.F90

dazlich added 2 commits March 3, 2023 13:57
This isn't where it was meant to be, see src/analysis_members
The various qsort references in the module uses have been eliminated as sort is no longer in the used modules.
@gdicker1 gdicker1 self-assigned this Apr 28, 2023
@gdicker1
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dazlich, did I explain this correctly? I don't see any reason to not move this through!

@dazlich
Copy link
Contributor

dazlich commented Apr 28, 2023 via email

Copy link
Contributor

@dazlich dazlich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, thanks

Copy link

@sherimickelson sherimickelson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @gdicker1 . Looks good.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@gdicker1 gdicker1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From recent looks at the code, I think we can merge this. There aren't any qsort routines left in the framework that I can find, so these renames aren't doing anything.

(Merge or don't merge have the same functionality, but merging would be cleaner in my opinion.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants