-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Class C tested for EU_868 #32
Conversation
Change LNA optimization for low DR
Added class_c_ABP example
Tested with ChirpStack, TTN Madrid V7 board with ABP and OTAA. As this board is still in development I will try testing with V2 board based on Arduino Nano 328P |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wow, good look for me. @wero1414
Tested in ATMega 328P using TTN MAdrid v2 node (https://github.com/IoTopenTech/Nodo_TTN_MAD_V2_2) |
Some of the problems I found testing Class C where related to the regional parameters, frequencies and data rates even working with TTN. I can only test with EU_868 so, if something goes wrong in other regions, activate DEBUG and check values sent to FRM just before going continuous receive to see if it meets correct freq and data rate. |
I have not seen a good example of a working class C code yet. The default settings for this code are US915, yet no working examples for this band. Am I missing something? I have searched and searched with no luck. |
Low datarate optimization on AGC auto on for DR11 and DR12, otherwise CRC_ERROR is detected by RFM in CLASS C continuos mode.
Other minor changes.