Fix leaderboard order

[BlackYps]

The 3v3 was listed last, because it has the highest id. So we have to switch to a different way to sort them, so they are in the order that you would expect.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2988 (783590b) into develop (329c775) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 783590b differs from pull request most recent head 37ca19b. Consider uploading reports for the commit 37ca19b to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #2988      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      61.33%   61.33%   -0.01%     
  Complexity      4594     4594              
=============================================
  Files            557      557              
  Lines          20185    20185              
  Branches        1048     1048              
=============================================
- Hits           12381    12380       -1     
  Misses          7218     7218              
- Partials         586      587       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ver/client/leaderboard/LeaderboardsController.java	86.36% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 329c775...37ca19b. Read the comment docs.

[Sheikah45]

So we just switch to sorting by the name? Wouldn't this potentially have the same issue in the future? Maybe we should add an order parameter to the league object

[BlackYps]

I agree in principle, but adding an order parameter would be more than one order of magnitude more work. It would require changes to the league service, the commons repo and finally the client. All of this to fix a problem that we might have in the future. At the moment I don't know of any plans to add more leagues.
So I propose that for now we roll with this change and if we notice that it actually causes problems in the future, then we can implement the more elaborate solution. Adding a new league would require changes to the league service anyway, so I could then easily add a new order parameter as well.