bgpd: Do not process NLRIs if the attribute length is zero #14260
+1
−1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
```
3 0x00007f423aa42476 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=11) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26
4 0x00007f423aef9740 in core_handler (signo=11, siginfo=0x7fffc414deb0, context=<optimized out>) at lib/sigevent.c:246
5 <signal handler called>
6 0x0000564dea2fc71e in route_set_aspath_prepend (rule=0x564debd66d50, prefix=0x7fffc414ea30, object=0x7fffc414e400)
at bgpd/bgp_routemap.c:2258
7 0x00007f423aeec7e0 in route_map_apply_ext (map=<optimized out>, prefix=prefix@entry=0x7fffc414ea30,
match_object=match_object@entry=0x7fffc414e400, set_object=set_object@entry=0x7fffc414e400, pref=pref@entry=0x0) at lib/routemap.c:2690
8 0x0000564dea2d277e in bgp_input_modifier (peer=peer@entry=0x7f4238f59010, p=p@entry=0x7fffc414ea30, attr=attr@entry=0x7fffc414e770,
afi=afi@entry=AFI_IP, safi=safi@entry=SAFI_UNICAST, rmap_name=rmap_name@entry=0x0, label=0x0, num_labels=0, dest=0x564debdd5130)
at bgpd/bgp_route.c:1772
9 0x0000564dea2df762 in bgp_update (peer=peer@entry=0x7f4238f59010, p=p@entry=0x7fffc414ea30, addpath_id=addpath_id@entry=0,
attr=0x7fffc414eb50, afi=afi@entry=AFI_IP, safi=<optimized out>, safi@entry=SAFI_UNICAST, type=9, sub_type=0, prd=0x0, label=0x0,
num_labels=0, soft_reconfig=0, evpn=0x0) at bgpd/bgp_route.c:4374
10 0x0000564dea2e2047 in bgp_nlri_parse_ip (peer=0x7f4238f59010, attr=attr@entry=0x7fffc414eb50, packet=0x7fffc414eaf0)
at bgpd/bgp_route.c:6249
11 0x0000564dea2c5a58 in bgp_nlri_parse (peer=peer@entry=0x7f4238f59010, attr=attr@entry=0x7fffc414eb50,
packet=packet@entry=0x7fffc414eaf0, mp_withdraw=mp_withdraw@entry=false) at bgpd/bgp_packet.c:339
12 0x0000564dea2c5d66 in bgp_update_receive (peer=peer@entry=0x7f4238f59010, size=size@entry=109) at bgpd/bgp_packet.c:2024
13 0x0000564dea2c901d in bgp_process_packet (thread=<optimized out>) at bgpd/bgp_packet.c:2933
14 0x00007f423af0bf71 in event_call (thread=thread@entry=0x7fffc414ee40) at lib/event.c:1995
15 0x00007f423aebb198 in frr_run (master=0x564deb73c670) at lib/libfrr.c:1213
16 0x0000564dea261b83 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at bgpd/bgp_main.c:505
```
With the configuration:
```
frr version 9.1-dev-MyOwnFRRVersion
frr defaults traditional
hostname ip-172-31-13-140
log file /tmp/debug.log
log syslog
service integrated-vtysh-config
!
debug bgp keepalives
debug bgp neighbor-events
debug bgp updates in
debug bgp updates out
!
router bgp 100
bgp router-id 9.9.9.9
no bgp ebgp-requires-policy
bgp bestpath aigp
neighbor 172.31.2.47 remote-as 200
!
address-family ipv4 unicast
neighbor 172.31.2.47 default-originate
neighbor 172.31.2.47 route-map RM_IN in
exit-address-family
exit
!
route-map RM_IN permit 10
set as-path prepend 200
exit
!
```
The issue is that we try to process NLRIs even if the attribute length is 0.
Later bgp_update() will handle route-maps and a crash occurs because all the
attributes are NULL, including aspath, where we dereference.
According to the RFC 4271:
A value of 0 indicates that neither the Network Layer
Reachability Information field nor the Path Attribute field is
present in this UPDATE message.
But with a fuzzed UPDATE message this can be faked. I think it's reasonable
to skip processing NLRIs if both update_len and attribute_len are 0.
Reported-by: Iggy Frankovic <iggyfran@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-13741/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. |
|
@Mergifyio backport stable/9.0 stable/8.5 |
✅ Backports have been created
|
This was referenced Aug 24, 2023
donaldsharp
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2023
bgpd: Do not process NLRIs if the attribute length is zero (backport #14260)
donaldsharp
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2023
bgpd: Do not process NLRIs if the attribute length is zero (backport #14260)
|
@Mergifyio backport stable/8.4 |
✅ Backports have been created
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With the configuration:
The issue is that we try to process NLRIs even if the attribute length is 0.
Later bgp_update() will handle route-maps and a crash occurs because all the attributes are NULL, including aspath, where we dereference.
According to the RFC 4271:
A value of 0 indicates that neither the Network Layer
Reachability Information field nor the Path Attribute field is
present in this UPDATE message.
But with a fuzzed UPDATE message this can be faked. I think it's reasonable to skip processing NLRIs if both update_len and attribute_len are 0.
Reported-by: Iggy Frankovic iggyfran@amazon.com