docs: Improved English usage on flutter_modular
#475
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some parts of the README documentation were a bit hard to understand because of errors in some sentences. I rewrote these parts to convey exactly the original idea. Moreover, whenever I spotted some textual inconsistencies, such as mixed casing of the same words in different places, I tried to make them consistent. There are still places to review regarding conceptual textual consistency, e.g. "all class names inside backtick quotation marks (`)" and the like. Also, some content review seems required, to better explain the ideas in some places.
Ascenio
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2021
RodolfoSilva
approved these changes
Jul 16, 2021
raphaelbarbosaqwerty
approved these changes
Jul 23, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some parts of the README documentation were a bit hard to understand because of errors in some sentences. I rewrote these parts to convey exactly the original idea. Moreover, whenever I spotted some textual inconsistencies, such as mixed casing of the same words in different places, I tried to make them consistent.
There are still places to review regarding conceptual textual consistency, e.g. "all class names inside backtick quotation marks (`)" and the like.
Also, some content review seems required, to better explain the ideas in some places.