-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding Surface QG dynamics? #106
Comments
We don't have any such plans at the moment so feel free to continue work on |
I have no plans! I'd suggest opening a PR sooner rather than later so we can collaborate on the new module + docs! The main challenge is coming up with dynamics / physics unit tests. For example, for two-dimensional turbulence we use the Lamb dipole: GeophysicalFlows.jl/test/test_twodnavierstokes.jl Lines 1 to 21 in 5f7795c
Perhaps there's a simple analogue for SQG, or we can come up with something else. Often such tests are nice sanity checks to have in place before publishing anything, too. @BrodiePearson have you come up with any tests? It'd be fun to make an example out of a script that reproduces the results of the paper, too. |
Are there plans to include a SurfaceQG model in GeophysicalFlows, to complement the other 2D and QG systems that can be modelled?
I started making an SQG model for GeophysicalFlows and I'd be happy to share/collaborate on it if there is not one already being developed. A very rough example code is here, and the
SurfaceQG.jl
file is also in that branch. It produces flow fields that look reasonable but I am still working to reproduce the results of a specific paper. I'd be happy to put together a doc of the equation set I'm trying to solve if that would be helpful (it is essentially the Equations of Section 2.1 in this paper).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: