You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The section in the docs about Sway's differences from Solidity should include a sub-section about the Address and ContractId types and how they are different from the context of the EVM
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
## Description
Closes#2704
## Checklist
- [x] I have linked to any relevant issues.
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas.
- [x] I have updated the documentation where relevant (API docs, the
reference, and the Sway book).
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works.
- [ ] I have added (or requested a maintainer to add) the necessary
`Breaking*` or `New Feature` labels where relevant.
- [x] I have done my best to ensure that my PR adheres to [the Fuel Labs
Code Review
Standards](https://github.com/FuelLabs/rfcs/blob/master/text/code-standards/external-contributors.md).
- [x] I have requested a review from the relevant team or maintainers.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kin Chan <calldelegation@calldelegation.local>
The section in the docs about Sway's differences from Solidity should include a sub-section about the Address and ContractId types and how they are different from the context of the EVM
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: