Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nuke EIL percentiles from reports #851

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 2, 2016
Merged

Nuke EIL percentiles from reports #851

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 2, 2016

Conversation

paulirish
Copy link
Member

In their current form, they don't add much.
I'd like to show the EIL/EQT distribution at some point, but for now, it's better to clean up the output:
image

@paulirish paulirish force-pushed the nukeEILpercentiles branch 2 times, most recently from 63f1ad7 to e03a2f3 Compare October 31, 2016 19:27
Copy link
Member

@brendankenny brendankenny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just a couple of missing words in the help text, otherwise looks good

@@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ class EstimatedInputLatency extends Audit {
name: 'estimated-input-latency',
description: 'Estimated Input Latency',
optimalValue: SCORING_POINT_OF_DIMINISHING_RETURNS.toLocaleString() + 'ms',
helpText: 'Primarily a measure of the main thread\'s activity. ' +
'There is a 90% probabililty a user would encounter of this amount or less. ' +
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"There is a 90% probabililty a user would encounter input latency of this amount or less"?

@paulirish paulirish merged commit 76d5263 into master Nov 2, 2016
@paulirish paulirish deleted the nukeEILpercentiles branch November 2, 2016 07:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants