Skip to content

Conversation

nitinprakash96
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@nitinprakash96 nitinprakash96 requested a review from jhrcek August 20, 2025 11:27
Copy link
Contributor

@jhrcek jhrcek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
resolver: nightly-2024-04-05
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While you're at it, you could also add 9.12.2 which is the current nighly 😸

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's a separate PR for supporting GHC 9.12. Had to bump base for that.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But this will require some version bumps (cabal outdated)

@jhrcek jhrcek merged commit 7f7a4b9 into master Aug 20, 2025
19 of 20 checks passed
@jhrcek jhrcek deleted the nitin/stack branch August 20, 2025 12:19
@jhrcek
Copy link
Contributor

jhrcek commented Aug 20, 2025

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants