feat:Introduce support for Int64 and UInt64 for protobuf

[viveknshah]

Fixes #11

Verified Tests locally:

[viveknshah]

@gabe-l-hart Not quite sure but I figured this was the expected outcome of the issue? Let me know if I misunderstood.

[gabe-l-hart]

Thanks for the contribution @viveknshah! Minor NIT on the spacing which you can fix by running make fmt in the base of the repo. Also, IBM's org enforces signed commits, so you can do the following to sign: git fetch origin && git rebase origin/main --signoff.

Finally, it would be great to add a quick unit test to explicitly verify that the new types are supported. We've still got 100% coverage as is since the dict is declared, but it would be great to ensure that nothing breaks in the JTD validation. The test would look a lot like this one.

[viveknshah]

Thanks for the contribution @viveknshah! Minor NIT on the spacing which you can fix by running make fmt in the base of the repo. Also, IBM's org enforces signed commits, so you can do the following to sign: git fetch origin && git rebase origin/main --signoff.

Finally, it would be great to add a quick unit test to explicitly verify that the new types are supported. We've still got 100% coverage as is since the dict is declared, but it would be great to ensure that nothing breaks in the JTD validation. The test would look a lot like this one.

Thank you for your patient feedback. Have made the appropriate formating flows, verified the added tests and followed the signed commit command.