Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pano request from Prevention Cluster (VMMC) - no way to toggle to SNU or IM #59

Closed
KTmonkey opened this issue Mar 29, 2018 · 11 comments
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@KTmonkey
Copy link

See the screenshot in the reference document because I'm not actually sure which dashboard the issue is on (sorry!)

But the tab at the top says it's an 'OU, SNU and IM Analysis' visual, but the filter to the left doesn't actually include options for selecting SNUs or IMs. At the least it's confusing, but adding the functionality would be very nice.

See nbr 3 in the specific issues section of the reference document:
https://www.pepfar.net/OGAC-HQ/icpi/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2FOGAC%2DHQ%2Ficpi%2FShared%20Documents%2FClusters%2FDIV%2FWorking%20Folder&FolderCTID=0x01200080CC6F83D1766F4D9E3497D4529EC74A&View=%7B94C838B2%2DE166%2D4122%2DB8B4%2D7BEB9E1BC12B%7D&InitialTabId=Ribbon%2ERead&VisibilityContext=WSSTabPersistence

@bowdenj
Copy link

bowdenj commented Mar 29, 2018

Thanks, @KTmonkey - for reference for us for the future, looks like this is on the Global ("All PEPFAR OUs") dashboard

@bowdenj
Copy link

bowdenj commented Mar 29, 2018

We would need to check with developers for this request--if dedup mechanisms are included, we should update the header to match the OU/SNU page so that it just says OU & SNU analysis. If dedup is not included, we can keep as-is. A toggle is going to be tough when talking about mechanisms, because we don't dedup mechanism-level data. Therefore, it pulls from a different back end dataset. So this may need to just be a label change for the title to avoid confusion, unless we're requesting something way bigger than that

@KTmonkey
Copy link
Author

of course Panorama is down right now for Maintenance so I can't look.But I feel like in other dashboards when the tab at the top says OU, SNU and IM analysis there is actually the ability to change the filters to make those selections. I could be imagining that though. Hard to say.. But clearer labeling at a minimum would be appreciated.

@bowdenj
Copy link

bowdenj commented Mar 29, 2018

@KTmonkey - Pano should not be down for maintenance. That message is letting you know that it will be down for maintenance on Monday

@bowdenj
Copy link

bowdenj commented Mar 29, 2018

I believe where we left this is that it says OU, SNU, & IM analysis on the Partner/Mech version of this dashboard. It shouldn't say that for the OU/SNU level dashboard--or if it does, it shouldn't. I don't think you can toggle between partner and non-partner data on the OU/SNU dashboard. Agreed that better labeling to show what's actually available on the page would help a lot.

@KTmonkey
Copy link
Author

zen desk ticket submitted, number 11082

@KTmonkey
Copy link
Author

KTmonkey commented Apr 2, 2018

update from Zendesk

Hello Katie,

Here is an update from the advanced team-

This issue has now been updated in the Panorama development site. It will be included in the upcoming release scheduled for 4/2/2018. Thank you.

Have a good weekend,
Thomas
Panorama Support team

@bowdenj
Copy link

bowdenj commented Apr 2, 2018

Hi @KTmonkey - This is another one that should be fixed in the release later today. Please confirm here over the next couple days to indicate whether this has been fixed or whether it needs additional attention. Thanks!

@KTmonkey
Copy link
Author

KTmonkey commented Apr 2, 2018 via email

@bowdenj
Copy link

bowdenj commented Apr 2, 2018

Awesome, thanks Katie!

@bowdenj
Copy link

bowdenj commented May 7, 2018

Fixed in most recent release.

@bowdenj bowdenj closed this as completed May 7, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants