Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate extensions and services from annex to registry #2092

Draft
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kirschbombe
Copy link
Contributor

@kirschbombe kirschbombe commented Jan 28, 2022

Preview: https://preview.iiif.io/api/annex-migration-services/registry/services/

This draft PR is the start of migrating the annex/services content to registry/services. So far this:

Some questions/comments:

  • do we want to have columns for presi 2 and 3 in the table?
  • migrating physdim from annex to registry changes the context path. For now, I updated the paths in the migrated text and made a copy of the physdim folder which I placed in the "registry/services" folder, leaving the original in "annex/services" folder as well
  • physdim has a note about adding a confidence label - is that something to discuss?
  • Editor's agreed that it would be good for physdim to get TRC review (next deadline in 9th Feb.)
  • I also found this issue discussing physdim as an extension instead of service: Document Physical Dimensions extension #1358

migrate geojson and physdim services from annex to registry
@tomcrane
Copy link
Contributor

Icons in the table could maybe reference https://iiif.io/api/presentation/3.0/#a-summary-of-property-requirements rather than redefine the symbols?

@kirschbombe kirschbombe changed the title Migrate geojson and physdim services from annex to registry Migrate extensions and services from annex to registry Feb 3, 2022
@kirschbombe kirschbombe added this to the Annex & Registry updates milestone Feb 3, 2022
…ty requirements

replace icon definitions with link to icon table in summary of property requirements
migrate openannotation from annex to registry; rename to webannotation

migrate openannotation from annex to registry; rename to webannotation
@glenrobson
Copy link
Member

How do you get to the webannotation registry part? Should it be linked from the api/index.md file?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants