Skip to content

Make block sparse SVD more generic #147

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

Make block sparse SVD more generic #147

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 16, 2025

Conversation

mtfishman
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 16, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 78.57143% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.98%. Comparing base (311f391) to head (15f1f23).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/factorizations/tensorproducts.jl 50.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
src/blocksparsearrayinterface/getunstoredblock.jl 88.88% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #147      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.15%   74.98%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          35       36       +1     
  Lines        1827     1835       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         1373     1376       +3     
- Misses        454      459       +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 7.53% <14.28%> (-0.04%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mtfishman mtfishman merged commit 1ee8b12 into main Jun 16, 2025
21 of 24 checks passed
@mtfishman mtfishman deleted the mf/generalize_svd branch June 16, 2025 20:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant