fix/notification-command-inherited-fields-missing refs #2286

[moreamazingnick]

Icinga director has different relations for Checks and Notifications but references the same db-table
for checks: check_command
for notifications: command

IcingaObjectfield loader only checks relation check_command

[moreamazingnick]

seems to be more complicated since the var resolver doesnt involve inheritance from a notification command. but the inheritance works

[moreamazingnick]

If we patch protected function eventuallyGetResolvedCommandVar(IcingaObject $object, $varName) ind DIrectorDatafield the resolver works works fine.

@Thomas-Gelf Please tell me if I should prepare another merge request, or if this inheritance behaviour is not a bug but a feature

[lippserd]

@moreamazingnick can you please reset your branch to master and reapply your change and then do a force push?

@raviks789 please check this PR.

[raviks789]

@lippserd I am not sure I understand the issue and why this change is required. It would nice if there are screenshots of the issue or steps to reproduce the issue.

[moreamazingnick]

@raviks789
If a notification template uses a notificationcommand the command fields are not present like in a servicetemplate
they have to be maually added.

without the patch:

• create notification template
• add notificationcommand
• no fields

with the patch:

• create notification template
• add notificationcommand
• all fields from the notificationcommand fields
  Best regards
  Nicolas