Skip to content

Conversation

antonwolfy
Copy link
Contributor

@antonwolfy antonwolfy commented Mar 19, 2025

The PR proposes to remove duplicating reference on dpnp.bitwise_count from a list of miscellaneous mathematical functions.
It seems better to have dpnp.bitwise_count listed under bit-wise operations only.

  • Have you provided a meaningful PR description?
  • Have you added a test, reproducer or referred to an issue with a reproducer?
  • Have you tested your changes locally for CPU and GPU devices?
  • Have you made sure that new changes do not introduce compiler warnings?
  • Have you checked performance impact of proposed changes?
  • Have you added documentation for your changes, if necessary?
  • Have you added your changes to the changelog?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 19, 2025

View rendered docs @ https://intelpython.github.io/dpnp/index.html

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Coverage Status

coverage: 71.763% (+0.01%) from 71.75%
when pulling b18f6ef on clean-up-rst
into 15b7644 on master.

Copy link
Contributor

Array API standard conformance tests for dpnp=0.18.0dev0=py312he4f9c94_32 ran successfully.
Passed: 1006
Failed: 0
Skipped: 17

@antonwolfy antonwolfy merged commit c2f0735 into master Mar 19, 2025
62 of 68 checks passed
@antonwolfy antonwolfy deleted the clean-up-rst branch March 19, 2025 11:54
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2025
… functions (#2372)

The PR proposes to remove duplicating reference on `dpnp.bitwise_count`
from a list of miscellaneous mathematical functions.
It seems better to have `dpnp.bitwise_count` listed under bit-wise
operations only. c2f0735
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants