-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
Open
Description
These lines seem to be redundant. Since tempSequence.begin
is a unique sequence that starts from 0 and d_SortIndices
is also a unique sequence that starts from 0, d_ReversedSortIndices
is guaranteed to be exactly the same as d_SortIndices
after gather. They why not directly copy d_SortIndices
to d_ReversedSortIndices
? I validated this on a few examples, but maybe there are cases where this is not the case?
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels