Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix haddock in checkLedgerState #443

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

carbolymer
Copy link
Contributor

@carbolymer carbolymer commented Feb 6, 2024

Changelog

- description: |
    Fix haddock in checkLedgerState
# uncomment types applicable to the change:
  type:
  # - feature        # introduces a new feature
  # - breaking       # the API has changed in a breaking way
  # - compatible     # the API has changed but is non-breaking
  # - optimisation   # measurable performance improvements
  # - improvement    # QoL changes e.g. refactoring
  # - bugfix         # fixes a defect
  # - test           # fixes/modifies tests
   - maintenance    # not directly related to the code
  # - release        # related to a new release preparation
  # - documentation  # change in code docs, haddocks...

Context

Fixes haddocks build. It was blocking chap release.

Checklist

  • Commit sequence broadly makes sense and commits have useful messages
  • New tests are added if needed and existing tests are updated. See Running tests for more details
  • Self-reviewed the diff

@carbolymer carbolymer added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 6, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit a3999d0 Feb 6, 2024
21 checks passed
@carbolymer carbolymer deleted the mgalazyn/fix/fix-haddock branch February 6, 2024 17:59
newhoggy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
put n shelley/byron key witnesses arguments in correct order
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants