Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose Block constructors #468

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2024
Merged

Conversation

angerman
Copy link
Contributor

@angerman angerman commented Mar 4, 2024

Changelog

- description: |
    Expose Block constructors
# uncomment types applicable to the change:
  type:
  # - feature        # introduces a new feature
  # - breaking       # the API has changed in a breaking way
  # - compatible     # the API has changed but is non-breaking
  # - optimisation   # measurable performance improvements
  - improvement    # QoL changes e.g. refactoring
  # - bugfix         # fixes a defect
  # - test           # fixes/modifies tests
  # - maintenance    # not directly related to the code
  # - release        # related to a new release preparation
  # - documentation  # change in code docs, haddocks...

marlowe-cardano is using this.

Copy link
Contributor

@erikd erikd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Just needs a rebase to remove those merge commits.

@angerman angerman force-pushed the jordan/expose-block-constructors branch from acb39d9 to 74598d6 Compare March 7, 2024 04:23
@angerman angerman force-pushed the jordan/expose-block-constructors branch from 74598d6 to 09756e6 Compare March 7, 2024 04:33
@carbolymer carbolymer added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 7, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 443e058 Mar 7, 2024
23 checks passed
@carbolymer carbolymer deleted the jordan/expose-block-constructors branch March 7, 2024 07:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants