-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/ufs dom update update #1048
Merged
travissluka
merged 13 commits into
feature/ufs_dom_update
from
feature/ufs_dom_update_update
Jun 20, 2024
Merged
Feature/ufs dom update update #1048
travissluka
merged 13 commits into
feature/ufs_dom_update
from
feature/ufs_dom_update_update
Jun 20, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… atlas interp (#1033) * WIP * working * cleanup * fix filename * fix coding norm * fix answers * increase tolerances
* remove travisci related scripts * remove travisci stuff from the readme
* fix out of bounds error * work around for weird divide by zero in diffusion * bug in increment_vert_scales fortran interface * fix forecast run for some intel systems * up tolerances for tests relying on mom6 forecast run
…tran! (#1035) * start replacing increment fortran code * delete more stuff * delete more * remove inc serialization * common Fields.h class * more cleanup * gpnorm * rms * WIP * cleanup geom iterator * coding norm * WIP * almost back to working * closer to working * back to working! * less synching * fix norm * WIP * remove fortran to fieldset * fix out of bounds error * fix bug * working again with fromFieldset removed * delete MORE * GeometryIterator::getFieldValue * cleanup * fix intel errors, maybe * fix compile error * unbreak G's code? * attempt 2
* updating references for saber bigMerge * trigger CI w/build-group
* Fix yaml for VarChange test * trigger CI --------- Co-authored-by: shlyaeva <anna.v.shlyaeva@noaa.gov>
Should we test this in ufs-bundle CI? |
shlyaeva
approved these changes
Jun 14, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
did not review at all, I trust Travis :)
6 tasks
climbfuji
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
merge develop into
feature/ufs_dom_update
to work with ufs-bundle tests.