Added Richardson-Lucy deconvolution

[jakubwro]

Hi, please review. If you think it's worth merging I'll update docs.

[giordano]

Wow, this is great, thank you very much! I'll review later.

This PR also reminds me that I should move documentation to Documenter 😓

[giordano]

I cannot comment on the algorithm in particular as I'm not familiar with it, but the code looks good, thank you so much!

If you think it's worth merging I'll update docs.

Yes, please 🙂

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #8 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master     #8   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files           2      3    +1     
  Lines          16     25    +9     
=====================================
+ Hits           16     25    +9

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/Deconvolution.jl	100% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
src/lucy.jl	100% <100%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4cb5227...77977db. Read the comment docs.

[jakubwro]

Hi @giordano , I added docs and more illustrative usage example

[giordano]

Awesome, I'll have a look in the next few days!

[jakubwro]

@giordano, I readded docs, but I have a feeling that messed something with git #history. Please have a look.

[giordano]

The history is not a problem, we can just squash everything 😉

I followed your struggle, I'm really sorry for this. I can feel your pain, I had similar problems a few days ago. In theses cases I think that it's easier to do a clean merge of the target branch on yours rather than rebasing.

[jakubwro]

@abhishalya , Documenter uses different output folder and .gitignore should be changed. Sorry for not catching that during review.

[abhishalya]

Ah, right. Sorry I missed that too. Thanks for correcting that :)

[jakubwro]

The history is not a problem, we can just squash everything wink

I followed your struggle, I'm really sorry for this. I can feel your pain, I had similar problems a few days ago. In theses cases I think that it's easier to do a clean merge of the target branch on yours rather than rebasing.

Right, it's not the first time I have this problem with rebase.

[giordano]

Documentation is available at https://juliadsp.github.io/Deconvolution.jl/dev/. Thank you so much @jakubwro and @abhishalya! This new method looks very good!