Skip to content

Conversation

gdalle
Copy link
Member

@gdalle gdalle commented Oct 8, 2025

Fixes #857

Might need additional tests depending on the coverage

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 90.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 97.22%. Comparing base (fca2ad3) to head (1f2cc3a).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...nterfaceSparseMatrixColoringsExt/jacobian_mixed.jl 90.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #864      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.10%   97.22%   -0.89%     
==========================================
  Files         134      131       -3     
  Lines        7984     7970      -14     
==========================================
- Hits         7833     7749      -84     
- Misses        151      221      +70     
Flag Coverage Δ
DI 97.68% <90.00%> (-1.11%) ⬇️
DIT 96.07% <ø> (-0.33%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sparse Jacobian preparation with mixed mode AD and GreedyColoringAlgorithm(; postprocessing=true) fails
1 participant