Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Coerce fails with string colspec #196

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 5, 2023

Conversation

Jay-sanjay
Copy link
Contributor

Coerce fails with string colspec issue #194 fixing
--> Added extra line in coerce.jl for string implementation

Copy link
Member

@juliohm juliohm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @Jay-sanjay for the proposed fix. Can you please add tests as well?

@Jay-sanjay
Copy link
Contributor Author

yes sure , I will work on that

src/transforms/coerce.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Jay-sanjay and others added 2 commits September 5, 2023 18:13
Co-authored-by: Elias Carvalho <73039601+eliascarv@users.noreply.github.com>
src/transforms/coerce.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Elias Carvalho <73039601+eliascarv@users.noreply.github.com>
src/transforms/coerce.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
@test eltype(tₒ.x1) == eltype(t.x1)
@test eltype(tₒ.x2) == eltype(t.x2)

# Test for :a => Multiclass
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think comments are not necessary in this case.

@@ -22,6 +23,16 @@
@test eltype(tₒ.x1) == eltype(t.x1)
@test eltype(tₒ.x2) == eltype(t.x2)

# Test for "a" => Multiclass
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think comments are not necessary in this case.

@juliohm
Copy link
Member

juliohm commented Sep 5, 2023 via email

@eliascarv eliascarv merged commit 4ff377b into JuliaML:master Sep 5, 2023
7 checks passed
@juliohm
Copy link
Member

juliohm commented Sep 5, 2023

Thank you @Jay-sanjay ! Feel free to pick another one. We can guide you with tips and suggestions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants