Skip to content

Conversation

nsajko
Copy link
Contributor

@nsajko nsajko commented Sep 10, 2025

One of the methods in question can be simply deleted because IndexCartesian is the default.

The other one is changed to be defined on the type instead of on the instance, as intended.

Preventing defining IndexStyle methods on instances (as opposed to types) prevents a single invalidation.

One of the methods in question can be simply deleted because
`IndexCartesian` is the default.

The other one is changed to be defined on the type instead of on the
instance, as intended.

Preventing defining `IndexStyle` methods on instances (as opposed to
types) prevents a single invalidation.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 10, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.02%. Comparing base (b823108) to head (bcdf53a).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #650      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.02%   84.02%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines        9298     9297       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         7813     7812       -1     
  Misses       1485     1485              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@nsajko nsajko changed the title fix IndexStyle method additions cholmod: correct IndexStyle method additions Sep 14, 2025
@nsajko nsajko changed the title cholmod: correct IndexStyle method additions cholmod: correct the IndexStyle method additions Sep 14, 2025
@rayegun rayegun merged commit 306605d into JuliaSparse:main Sep 14, 2025
10 checks passed
@nsajko nsajko deleted the invalidations_fixes_cholmod branch September 14, 2025 20:54
@KristofferC KristofferC added the backport 1.12 Change should be backported to release-1.12 label Sep 22, 2025
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
@KristofferC KristofferC mentioned this pull request Sep 22, 2025
7 tasks
@KristofferC KristofferC removed the backport 1.12 Change should be backported to release-1.12 label Sep 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants