Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update paper based on JOSS review #45

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 6, 2020
Merged

Update paper based on JOSS review #45

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 6, 2020

Conversation

oxinabox
Copy link
Member

@oxinabox oxinabox commented Feb 5, 2020

openjournals/joss-reviews#1956 (comment)

@Ayushk4 if you are happy with this merge it and comment on the JOSS issue

Copy link
Member

@Ayushk4 Ayushk4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One small typo. Otherwise LGTM. 👍

Co-Authored-By: Ayush Kaushal <ayushk4@gmail.com>
@Ayushk4
Copy link
Member

Ayushk4 commented Feb 6, 2020

LGTM. Merging this.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 6, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #45 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #45   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.09%   94.09%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines         525      525           
=======================================
  Hits          494      494           
  Misses         31       31

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c8ad299...2ff8b36. Read the comment docs.

@Ayushk4 Ayushk4 merged commit 48448b5 into master Feb 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants