Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial Content Search merge #327

Merged
merged 211 commits into from
Jul 19, 2012
Merged

Initial Content Search merge #327

merged 211 commits into from
Jul 19, 2012

Conversation

jlsherrill
Copy link
Member

QA requested a drop of content search so while this is not 100% complete, it is about 95% of the final content search feature.

@mccun934
@iNecas
@bbuckingham

jlsherrill and others added 30 commits May 29, 2012 15:18
Initial content search boilerplate
CFB - Adding basic layouts for grid and browse box.
single select
first environment linkage
css change on select
this allows clicking on nodes to select the checkbox
Content browser select functionality
CFB - Adds basic browser elements for input and selection wireframing.
A couple of fixes to Content browser
Adding initial browse box functionality
(cherry picked from commit 889f1b5516b47afc47566647d8ea59f94581cc70)
Added product search + auto complete
up the environment selector to add/remove columns.
parthaa and others added 12 commits July 12, 2012 17:13
Added server side code for Repo Compare Shared/Unique
content browser - fixing migration of repo.library_instance_id
experience such that clicking to slide right reveals more columns to the
right.
CS - Changes sliding aspect of grid to be more inuitive to a user's
content browser - fixing migration script to properly propogate paths
Content browser - merging in master
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 17, 2012

yes, we really need it to check functionality (as it seems done) right from master install.

before_filter :find_repos, :only => [:repo_compare_packages, :repo_compare_errata]

def rules
contents_test = lambda{true}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will we have a permissions model for the content search?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah good catch. There are no permissions directly related to content
search, it is based off visibility of Providers and Environments. So
we do need to fix that.

-Justin

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Brad Buckingham
reply@reply.github.com
wrote:

+#
+# This software is licensed to you under the GNU General Public
+# License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
+# 2 of the License (GPLv2) or (at your option) any later version.
+# There is NO WARRANTY for this software, express or implied,
+# including the implied warranties of MERCHANTABILITY,
+# NON-INFRINGEMENT, or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You should
+# have received a copy of GPLv2 along with this software; if not, see
+# http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.txt.
+require 'util/package_util'
+class ContentSearchController < ApplicationController

  • before_filter :find_repo, :only => [:repo_packages, :repo_errata]
  • before_filter :find_repos, :only => [:repo_compare_packages, :repo_compare_errata]
  • def rules
  • contents_test = lambda{true}

Will we have a permissions model for the content search?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/Katello/katello/pull/327/files#r1182571

@bbuckingham
Copy link
Member

Finished a very quick cursory pass through the code... In the future, would be nice to have features like this broken down in to smaller pull requests to make the review process more effective. I know, easier said than done... :)

@iNecas
Copy link
Member

iNecas commented Jul 19, 2012

ACK

@bbuckingham
Copy link
Member

ACK, with comments addressed in follow-up pull request.

@mccun934
Copy link
Member

ACK from me. merge away

bbuckingham added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2012
@bbuckingham bbuckingham merged commit 34466ee into master Jul 19, 2012
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants