Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: make the opposition detection more reliable #39

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2022
Merged

fix: make the opposition detection more reliable #39

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2022

Conversation

Deuchnord
Copy link
Member

Q A
Bug fix? yes
New feature? no
Related issues Fix #38
Has BC-break no
License GNU AGPL-v3

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 8, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 95.556% when pulling e4b87fa on fix/opposition-false-positive into a99ef9d on main.

@Deuchnord Deuchnord force-pushed the fix/opposition-false-positive branch from 6a1f584 to e4b87fa Compare January 8, 2022 21:42
@Deuchnord Deuchnord merged commit 761ec4e into main Jan 8, 2022
@Deuchnord Deuchnord deleted the fix/opposition-false-positive branch January 8, 2022 21:48
@Deuchnord Deuchnord added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

False positive on oppositions
2 participants
@Deuchnord @coveralls