Skip to content

Conversation

eigenmikem
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation:

Explain here the context, and why you're making that change. What is the problem you're trying to solve.

Modifications:

Describe the modifications you've done.

Result:

After your change, what will change.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ypatil12 ypatil12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2 comments


/// @inheritdoc IOperatorTableCalculator
/**
* @dev Returns operator addresses and their corresponding weight arrays for the operatorSet
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the return statement in the IOperatorTableCalculator is sufficient for all of these? NO need for the dev comment?


/// @inheritdoc IOperatorTableCalculator
/**
* @dev Returns the weight array for a specific operator in the operatorSet, or empty array if not found
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Think we can remove all of these return dev statements from the IOperatorTableCalculator

@ypatil12 ypatil12 merged commit ec9fc68 into feat/natspec-review-updates Aug 1, 2025
5 checks passed
@ypatil12 ypatil12 deleted the mike/natspec-updates branch August 1, 2025 15:39
ypatil12 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2025
**Motivation:**

*Explain here the context, and why you're making that change. What is
the problem you're trying to solve.*

**Modifications:**

*Describe the modifications you've done.*

**Result:**

*After your change, what will change.*
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants