Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update the Design Principles with some addressment of our public benefit company mission #187

Closed
7 of 10 tasks
awolfinthewind opened this issue Feb 19, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed
7 of 10 tasks
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@awolfinthewind
Copy link
Contributor

Context

Learners Guild is a public benefit company. In the interest of making sure our Design Principles are in alignment with this, I would like to call for them to address inequities and inaccessibility currently preventing a dignified livelihood for all.

Criteria

Inequities (social, economic, racial, etc) addressed in Design Principles
Inaccessibility addressed in Design Principles

Principles razor

  • Cultivate a learning community.
  • Prioritize scale over quality
  • Align incentives
  • Build a team game
  • Trust people's intentions and potential
  • Enable self-organization & self-determination
  • Map feedback loops
  • Optimize for agility
  • Simulation not preparation
  • Sustain the tension between individual and collective gain
@tannerwelsh tannerwelsh added this to the Alpha milestone Feb 29, 2016
@shereefb
Copy link
Contributor

We need to update the principles if they stand alone as the only thing we consider for designing the los. What's needed imo is to clarify that they stand along with our business purpose, player experience goals, and game objectives.

@shereefb
Copy link
Contributor

shereefb commented Mar 9, 2016

@awolfinthewind good enough? can I close?

@awolfinthewind
Copy link
Contributor Author

yes. tension resolved.

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Shereef Bishay notifications@github.com
wrote:

@awolfinthewind https://github.com/awolfinthewind good enough? can I
close?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#187 (comment)
.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants