Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add trade penalty #703

Closed
wants to merge 70 commits into from
Closed

Add trade penalty #703

wants to merge 70 commits into from

Conversation

nblaxall
Copy link

Add trade penalty to lc0 20.1

Tilps and others added 30 commits September 9, 2018 23:25
Add trade penalty to 20.1
Also temporarily disable best_child_cached_.
Also add some more params to control things.
Also increase hash size to 1024MB.
killerducky and others added 27 commits February 17, 2019 17:04
Also cleanup some log messages.
AuxEngineOptions is now "optname1=value1;optname2=value2" format.
Change default AuxEngineDepth from 20 to 15.
Make version v0.21.0-fish-v0.2
Default 3, setting to 1 will give v0.2 behavior.

Store move that was boosted. Note two magic values
are used to store extra state, TODO improve this.

Fix bug that caused castling to not be boosted by
using move packed_int instead of nn_index.

Move node.auxengine_move_ member to the proper spot,
now Node size is still 80 bytes.

Move auxengine intialization into AuxEngineWorker,
so init time does not slow down startup.
Compressed format does not allow this.
Also set maximum AuxEngineBoost to 100.
Auto detects if AuxEngine has the SyzygyPath UCI option,
and auto sets it to the same value given to Lc0 engine.
Update initial params and force a new appveyor build to boot :)
force another compile
@Naphthalin
Copy link
Contributor

As trade penalty is non-zero and the possible advantages of this are available through a combination of MLH and draw score which are both merged in v0.25, I recommend closing this PR.

@borg323
Copy link
Member

borg323 commented Apr 28, 2020

Moreover there seems to have been a bad merge at some point, there are lots of code unrelated to trade penalty here.

@mooskagh mooskagh closed this Apr 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants