-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
Fixing bug with FYPP macros #931
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+11
−10
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are you sure this works? why don't you just specify
acc kernels
via an option to GPU_PARALLEL? right now it looks like you're doing things differently than before when it would be easy to make them the same, but i'm quite sure why. i guess if this parallel loop works it is nicer than invoking kernels? idkThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
acc kernels
requires the compiler to parallelize the surrounded code for you. The compiler will also not parallelize if it cannot guarantee data-dependency free loops. There is no OpenMP support for the compiler to analyze code and parallelize the code on behalf of the developer. If there should be maximum performance with OpenMP, then the codebase can't useGPU_KERNELS
or its equivalent since that won't have GPU acceleration in OpenMP.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what i'm saying is you would use kernels if the compiler is nvhpc and the offload engine is openacc. otherwise, it goes to OMP and uses whatever is appropriate for that compiler. this would all be taken care of in the macro. of course if you can find a
acc parallel
shortcut that also works for nvhpc + openacc that's fine with me too.